Mutt posed a good point. Is there an affordable solution to the decline ip paysite sales?

So some advice on how to advise a girl to run and create her own solo girl site.

She needs to decide what she will do and if she will do it on her own or with partners, same or multi.

Then look at who she is.
What makes her special and different.
What she really like to do in her sexual life, what she would like to do online, what her fantasies are.

Then start to look at what others do and see how she can make her offering more about her. Not to copy them, to adapt them to her personality and what she can offer.

Now is the time to start thinking in terms of the market. Who will want what she has to offer, how is the best way to fill their needs. To contact them and more importantly get herself through to them. The avenues she uses to do this are well know and already used, taking a look at what others do is good. Improve on it.

Telling someone to use the freeway from LA to Las Vegas, isn't teaching them to drive, that's what she needs to learn. How to drive through her message. Not the URL of Facebook.

So armed with all this, now it's time to start writing her ideas of how to approach this down. It needs variation, needs some depth, needs some lure, selling and closing.

Then practice in front of a camera. Review it and improve. When happy start shooting content and the marketing material.

That's how you create a non vanilla product that shows a person individuality. Telling them to go on a site is about as low level as telling them to turn the computer on. It's about what they do when they get on the site that's what real marketing is about.

Flame away.

you sad old little man.

my target audience enjoyed the article and it wasn't all obvious advice to them because they aren't gfy trolls like you. they don't sit on gfy all day reading this garbage. most of them have real jobs, and most of them have more sales than you.

it wasn't an article on "how to create content". it is clearly labeled as a marketing article. why would i cover content creation in a marketing article unless i was a broke, UNretired, out-of-work shooter trolling gfy? you are the only one that mixes up subjects in a single post.

my marketing advice is REAL WORLD advice with proven numbers and its being used in the actual marketplace. its not some pathetic old man telling everybody how he knows everything but doesn't do anything except bullshit on gfy all day.

i put it back to you - show me someone taking YOUR advice in this marketplace? i have plenty of positive references and testimonials.

Just to check here, can you post some URLs of solo girl sites you have given this advice to so we can see them in action?

Or is this another hypothetical "if I had ever consulted on a solo girl site I would have said this" scenario?

from someone who has never built or run a solo site? ever?

you are a dipshit Paul.


EDIT: fucking exactly..

Than what's to be scared of?

When you get here.

I will, for the right offer. Make one.

Thinking of doing it if no one buys it.

No it's not. But you're a small fish. There are bigger fish. Not taking the first lame offer.

Well then it's my loss. I can afford it.

Now that's it closed book. Get the ticket and come, or are you scared of me and my dog.

Make a better offer or STFU.

When did I suggest I was scared?

I said you were scared because you are now bottling it and taking back your offer after we agreed. Same old.

Sure. You will just laugh at me and say you were trolling. Send the money or book the flight yourself.

I'm the only person I can see offering you anything. I'd be biting my hand off if I was you.

I'll call Fabian and ask him if he's interested.

Paul, you posted saying I couldn't afford the ticket over, and you are right. You offered to buy my flight and now you are going back on that deal. That's fine. I can understand why you would feel worried.

Guess I won't be coming and you won't be selling your old content. Shame.

The invention of the incandescent light bulb has a history spanning from the early 1800s. Until that time, available light sources consisted of candles, oil lanterns, and gas lamps. In 1809, an English chemist, Humphrey Davy, started the journey to the invention of a practical incandescent light source. He used a high power battery to induce current between two charcoal strips. The current flowing through the two charcoal strips produced an intense incandescent light, creating the first arc lamp.

In 1820, Warren De la Rue made the first known attempt to produce an incandescent light bulb. He enclosed a platinum coil in an evacuated tube and passed an electric current through it. The design was based on the concept that the high melting point of platinum would allow it to operate at high temperatures and that the evacuated chamber would contain less gas particles to react with the platinum, improving its longevity. Although it was an efficient design, the cost of the platinum made it impractical for commercial use.

Throughout the 1800s, many scientists and inventors strove to create a cost effective, practical, long-life incandescent light bulb. The primary hurdle was creating a long-lived, high-temperature filament--the key to a practical incandescent light. Many high-melting-point materials were explored in inert/evacuated chambers in the process.

Men such as William Robert Grove, Frederik de Moleyns, W.E. Staite, John Daper, Edward G. Shepard, Heinrich Gobel, C. de Chagny, John T. Way, Alexander de Lodyguine, Joseph Wilson Swan, and Thomas A. Edison dedicated their time and efforts in the race to develop the first practical incandescent light bulb. Breakthroughs for Edison and Swan came in 1879, when they independently developed the first incandescent lamp that lasted a practical length of time -- at best a mere 13.5 hours. Their separate designs were based on a carbon fiber filament derived from cotton. The next stage of development focused on extending the practical life of the carbon filament bulb. Edison developed bamboo-derived filaments in 1880 that lasted up to 1200 hours.

The efficiency of an incandescent lamp design centers about attaining high filament temperatures without degradation and loss of heat. Edison?s early selection of carbon, the highest melting temperature element, with a melting point of 3,599 oC or 6510 oF seemed the obvious choice. The problem with carbon is that at high operating temperatures it evaporates, or sublimes, relatively quickly at 0.1 torr at 2,675 oC, resulting in short filament life.
The early solution to this dilemma was to operate the filament at lower temperatures to attain reasonable life. However, the incandescent brightness of the bulb was sacrificed in the process.

Other light bulb inventors tried two new filament materials to improve bulb brightness. In 1898, Karl Auer used osmium, which has a melting point of 2,700 oC / 4,890 oF. Then in 1903, Siemens and Halske worked with tantalum, which melts at 2,996 oC / 5,425 oF. These elements drew attention because they could operate at higher temperatures with longer life and less evaporation.

Because of its strength, ductility and workability, tungsten can readily be formed into the filament coils, used to enhance performance in modern incandescent bulbs. Due to its high melting point, tungsten can be heated to 3000oC / 5,432 oF, where it glows white hot providing very good brightness. However, the early tungsten filaments still sublimed too quickly at such high temperatures. As they sublimed, they also coated the bulbs with a thin black tungsten film, reducing their light output.

Then the invention of ductile tungsten, a much improved filament material, sparked the development of the modern tungsten filament incandescent light bulb by the General Electric Company and William Coolidge in 1906-10. This is the light bulb we know today.

Inert gases such as nitrogen and argon were later added to bulbs to reduce tungsten evaporation, or sublimation. While these gases reduced evaporation and increased filament life, they also carried heat away from the filament, reducing its temperature and brightness. Winding the wires into fine coils, as used in modern incandescent filaments, reduced convective heat loss, allowing the filament to operate at the desired temperatures.

Modern incandescent bulbs are not energy efficient, only four to six percent of the electrical power supplied to the bulb is converted into visible light. The remaining energy is lost as heat.

You really are a dumb ass.

.

He's in a good place then, GFY is full of them.

his thoughts dont matter, because he doesnt own any paysites, its like someone giving advice on running a law firm, when they are a garbage man.

You are one of the biggest ones on here.

You are at the end of your life.

34 years of shooting content.

You don't make any kind of money from it.

Your content, at best is just cheap filler crap for old, outdated TGPs.

That's how your entire career can be summed up.

That's how your lifes work will be remembered.

Then don't bother reading the thread.

Actually I own 2. They were just sidelines and not that good. Much better safer markets in porn for us.

I've been in porn 34 years and might have a few ideas to give.

Which is more than the trolls have. They never have anything to contribute.

Those who can't do, teach. Right?

Seriously Paul, it would be like you advising CERN on neutrinos. Comical. You've never had a successful website, yet you feel you can advise on how to have one. Surely, and this is not a tricky thought, if you knew what you were doing, you'd have a successful website?

Unless you is just trollin'?

;)

Fixed it for you.

didnt you win troll of the year?

kettle black