GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Do u use condom when fuck your girlfriend? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=103486)

TheGoldenChild 01-30-2003 09:10 PM

for the record though I ALWAYS USE a condom!

I have to....I have no steady GF, or GFE for that matter :-))

Libertine 01-30-2003 09:10 PM

Summary of the discussion so far:

xxxdesign-net doesn't believe in STD tests, quoting Dugmor as proof that they aren't reliable. Later, he claimed he wasn't talking about HIV tests. Apparently, HIV is no longer considered an STD.
When Dugmor's authority on the subject was questioned (why does he know what all doctors apparently don't know yet?), SleazyDream got mighty pissed. It seems he has a secret crush on Dugmor, and would like to be fishhooked and be cummed on by him some time. Understandable, in a raunchy kind of way.
SleazyDream went on to claim that when confronted with medical issues, we should not trust doctors, but people we socialize with. Apparently, he is making plans to let his doctor take over his site, and will himself take on a new carreer as the world's fattest cowgirl.
SleazyDream also gets pissed when confronted with the fact that some people have friends outside of the porn biz. He seems to be horrified by the thought that there are people outside of the porn biz, who don't know who he is and don't consider him "elite" because of his parties. Little does he know about the many people in the porn biz that don't consider him "elite" either, but think he's a fat wanker instead.
Also, KimmyKim is pmsing. Something that is a small wonder, considering her age. The medical world has already stated further research will be conducted. SleazyDream reacted furiously, saying he had as much rights as they do to reseach KimmyKim's pmsing.

Libertine 01-30-2003 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net



Pathetic.... :helpme
backpedaling.... haha

If we were talking about Aids....Why would we talk about STD's ?? :helpme
ITs not my problem if you think only AIds is worth worrying for....!

AS for Dugmore... do you know how to read...?

First he started by saying:
"We will ask that your boys or men have HIV tests, recent, and we will have the same..." hint... hint....!?

and then responded to Pine medical clearances... for STDs!!!
YOu think that they only check for aids on Porn Shoots!
hehe

IDIOT!

Dude, when it says: "This is an e-mail from a Member of Her First Gang Bang ............ " above something, it's rather clear that *he* was not the one saying that, but rather the person that sent the email.
Dimwit.

SleazyDream 01-30-2003 09:14 PM

punkworld you have real issues dude. Sad really. I hear medication can sometimes help people as FUCKED UP as you are.

Libertine 01-30-2003 09:15 PM

But, I will leave you wankers alone for now, because I have work to do.
Goodnight, dimwits.

xxxdesign-net 01-30-2003 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld
Summary of the discussion so far:

xxxdesign-net doesn't believe in STD tests, quoting Dugmor as proof that they aren't reliable. Later, he claimed he wasn't talking about HIV tests. Apparently, HIV is no longer considered an STD.

FUCK... You are even DUMBER then I thought... And I really mean it!!!!

From the beginning... I said that STDs test were not 100% reliable.... (yes some STD's can be detected effectively... like HIV... and some can't.... thats exactly what Dugmor said...)

THat, was as I reply to what you said earlier.... about not having to care about past girlfriends' STD's since STDs test would take care of it!!!!

GIVE UP!!! YOU REALLY EMBARRASSING YOURSELF HERE!! :helpme

xxxdesign-net 01-30-2003 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld


Dude, when it says: "This is an e-mail from a Member of Her First Gang Bang ............ " above something, it's rather clear that *he* was not the one saying that, but rather the person that sent the email.
Dimwit.


hehe... whether he said it or not is not even relevant...

this is:
Quote:

and then responded to Pine medical clearances... for STDs!!!
YOu think that they only check for aids on Porn Shoots!
hehe
Dugmor was talking about STDs!!

Libertine 01-30-2003 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net
hehe... whether he said it or not is not even relevant...

this is:

...

Dugmor was talking about STDs!!

She wanted HIV tests from the guys.

Then, someone said to him that he should get her test as well. He asked what kind of test. Two answer were given: "AIDS test" and "medical clearances".

In response to that, he said "Tests are bullshit".

Now, I am really gonna get to work already. Arguing with morons like you kills brain cells.

xxxdesign-net 01-30-2003 09:35 PM

Quote:

Are STD tests always accurate?
No test for any STD is 100% accurate. Some STDs don't show up right away. It could take an infection anywhere from a couple of days to a few years to show up in testing. But if you think you have a STD, get tested. You may have to go back again to get tested if you test negative. Even if you test negative, keep practicing safer sex. Talk to your health care provider about speaking with a counselor if you have concerns.

http://www.youngwomenshealth.org/std-general.html
From Children's Hospital Boston

:321GFY

xxxdesign-net 01-30-2003 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld


Arguing with morons like you kills brain cells.


Yeah, I think your brain cells were recently declared an "Endangered Specie"!? :arcadefre

:321GFY

Libertine 01-30-2003 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net



http://www.youngwomenshealth.org/std-general.html
From Children's Hospital Boston

:321GFY

Funny you didn't reply to the post in which I basically proved you were talking bullshit.

Besides that, did I ever say STD tests are 100% accurate? Condoms are not 100% reliable, the pill is not 100% reliable, and neither are STD tests.
However, they didn't say "Tests are bullshit", did they? No, in fact they even recommended taking them. Dimwit.


Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net
Yeah, I think your brain cells were recently declared an "Endangered Specie"!?

"Specie" should be "species". Specie means coined money, or coin.

TDF 01-30-2003 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream
idiot = punkworld
punkworld = idiot


my God - the terms are interchangeable!

you made a funny

xxxdesign-net 01-30-2003 10:39 PM

Quote:


Besides that, did I ever say STD tests are 100% accurate? Condoms are not 100% reliable, the pill is not 100% reliable, and neither are STD tests.
However, they didn't say "Tests are bullshit", did they? No, in fact they even recommended taking them. Dimwit.

I give up.... You just dont get it....

here's my previous quote:
Quote:

From the beginning... I said that STDs test were not 100% reliable.... (yes some STD's can be detected effectively... like HIV... and some can't....)

THat, was as I reply to what you said earlier.... about not having to care about past girlfriends' STD's since STDs test would take care of it!!!!
My reference to Dugmor's post was to show you that you should be worry about your girlfriends past.... std's she could have that are not detected thru STD's tests....

AS for your pathetic exemples... condoms, pills.... if use correctly.... they are nearly 100% effective minus some decimals....
Oranges and Apples... I think that was mentioned several times on this thread right!?
Dimwit

Libertine 01-30-2003 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net


My reference to Dugmor's post was to show you that you should be worry about your girlfriends past.... std's she could have that are not detected thru STD's tests....

AS for your pathetic exemples... condoms, pills.... if use correctly.... they are nearly 100% effective minus some decimals....
Oranges and Apples... I think that was mentioned several times on this thread right!?
Dimwit

For condoms, the typical failure rate is about 12%, somewhat worse than birth-control pills (8%), but better than the diaphragm (18%), withdrawal (19%) and rhythm (20%). [Source: "Contraceptive Technology," Irvington Press, and Family Planning Perspectives journal.]

And, you did not say "tests are not 100% reliable" from the beginning. You quoted a post saying "tests are bullshit". See the difference?
Ofcourse they aren't 100% reliable. Nothing is. However, they are very accurate - albeit not 100% - and after that comes what one can consider an acceptable risk.

MakeMeGrrrrowl 01-30-2003 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by pink_in_the_middle


I'm not sure if it's called the same in the U.S but in Canada it's called NORPLANT.
Once it's inserted into her arm you can visably see it,and to be honest I don't think most girls would go for this.
It comes with a bunch of other side effect too.

Info HERE

I actually had this for a year...but had it taken out. I could not lose any of the weight I gained with my first daughter...and I was never heavy before that..so I thought it was because of the norplant that I could not lose weight. I had it taken out...left my husband and lost 40 of the 60lbs I gained within a few months. Not sure if it was because I left my husband or had the norplant taken out. *shrugs*

I know with my second daughter I only gained 16 lbs and I lost 10 before even leaving the hospital.

The norplant was also pretty new when I had it put in almost 10 years ago. Dunno if it has changed since then.

xxxdesign-net 01-30-2003 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by punkworld


For condoms, the typical failure rate is about 12%, somewhat worse than birth-control pills (8%),


Why? Why??? :helpme
Looks like a Republican talking... Always forgeting to mention the real percentage when the pill, condom is use CORRECTLY....

Surf the web a little more and you'll see stats ranging from 97% to 100% minus some decimals...

Libertine 01-31-2003 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net



Why? Why??? :helpme
Looks like a Republican talking... Always forgeting to mention the real percentage when the pill, condom is use CORRECTLY....

Surf the web a little more and you'll see stats ranging from 97% to 100% minus some decimals...

Please, do provide me with some sources in that case. I showed you mine, now show me yours.

But regardless of that, even if what you are saying were the case, always using them correctly really is a rather unrealistic ideal. For instance, it requires you to never have sex while drunk. And, ofcourse, never make a tiny mistake. Basically, always using them correctly comes down to having sex in a lab, while not being hindered by things like excitement or intoxication.

Dugmor 02-01-2003 06:36 PM

I am sure a Doctor would agree with me !

Sex is dangerous how ever you look at it !

Youc an catch STD's from a girl you meet in a bar , the same as a hooker you rent for an hour !

Libertine 02-03-2003 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Dugmor
I am sure a Doctor would agree with me !

Sex is dangerous how ever you look at it !

Youc an catch STD's from a girl you meet in a bar , the same as a hooker you rent for an hour !

I am sad to say that you indeed are right.

SD, xxxdesign-net, you were right as well. My apologies. Now excuse me while I beat up that cheating excuse for a gf of mine for giving me herpes.

StinkBerg 02-03-2003 02:03 PM

i lube that gap up with some carmel sauce and then put sprinkles in her cave box and strick my fingers and man muscle right up in there and do the old in out in out 31 times in memorial to 31 flavors then i pop her cherry and yell RAINBOW SHERBERT.

who needs condoms.:2 cents: :2 cents: :2 cents: :2 cents:


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123