Two computers one task??? - GoFuckYourself.com

Muff · 01-25-2003, 12:59 PM

I have some video work I am doing and it is a slow and menial task.

I have a couple computers here a dual p3 1.0 and a p4 2.4 I wanna know if it's possible to network them so they can work on one task together using all of their CPU together?

gothweb · 01-25-2003, 01:07 PM

It is possible, but generally if you only have two computers, it isn't worth it. If you have a larger bank, and the tasks can be run on UNIX, you can do some amazing stuff.

Theo · 01-25-2003, 01:08 PM

i sale cheap IBM supercomputer only $390

chupacabra · 01-25-2003, 01:10 PM

muff, not w/ windows... i assume your encoding software all runs on windows? you could look into setting up a beowulf cluster, but you'd have to come up w/ *nix solutions to your encoding needs. i have 4 P4 1.8GHz systems set up in a Beowulf cluster that i do some encoding tasks, but i did have to set up quite a bit of scripting to make it work properly... there is no painless way to set up what you need however, do some searching on 'beowulf clustering' if you want to get some more info..

Muff · 01-25-2003, 01:21 PM

Thanks for the info guys.

Did some searching on beowulf clustering seems a little advanced for someone with no unix experience.

Soul I'll trade you 1 digit UIN for the super computer?

WiredGuy · 01-25-2003, 01:29 PM

Distributed computing isn't very windows friendly. Unix on the other hand no problem. My recommendation would be to launch a video task on each computer for 2 different videos. Just reduce the amount of encoding your doing by spreading the videos on each machine. Not much else you can do under a windows environment.

WG

Muff · 01-25-2003, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by WiredGuy
Distributed computing isn't very windows friendly. Unix on the other hand no problem. My recommendation would be to launch a video task on each computer for 2 different videos. Just reduce the amount of encoding your doing by spreading the videos on each machine. Not much else you can do under a windows environment.

WG

Yep

Wish I had of learned Unix or Linux before I got hooked on Windoze

gothweb · 01-25-2003, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Muff

Yep Wish I had of learned Unix or Linux before I got hooked on Windoze

It isn't too late. One of the easiest ways to ease into Unix is to get a Mac with OS X. It has a real unix (BSD) base, with a UI you can get used to. Implementations are available for tools such a beowulf.

Muff · 01-25-2003, 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by gothweb

It isn't too late. One of the easiest ways to ease into Unix is to get a Mac with OS X. It has a real unix (BSD) base, with a UI you can get used to. Implementations are available for tools such a beowulf.

I hoped I would never use a MAC again but might be worth it to get the basics of Unix down.

I'll research it thanks for the tip.

SpaceAce · 01-25-2003, 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Muff

Yep Wish I had of learned Unix or Linux before I got hooked on Windoze

It's never too late to learn.

http://www.suse.com
http://www.debian.org
http://www.freebsd.org

^^ All free. I suggest SuSE, it is the most Windows-friendly. It comes with a nice GUI and does all the automatic hardware detecting and stuff you're used to.

SpaceAce

Muff · 01-25-2003, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SpaceAce

It's never too late to learn.

http://www.suse.com
http://www.debian.org
http://www.freebsd.org

^^ All free. I suggest SuSE, it is the most Windows-friendly. It comes with a nice GUI and does all the automatic hardware detecting and stuff you're used to.

SpaceAce

Thanks for the links

Libertine · 01-25-2003, 02:47 PM

If you don't know Linux at all, I would suggest mandrake (or maybe redhat). Very simple, almost as simple as windows even.

freebsd and debian would most likely not be very suitable for someone new to linux, and in my opinion mandrake and redhat are easier to learn than suse.

notjoe · 01-25-2003, 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Muff
I have some video work I am doing and it is a slow and menial task.

I have a couple computers here a dual p3 1.0 and a p4 2.4 I wanna know if it's possible to network them so they can work on one task together using all of their CPU together?

I think you're best bet is to do what you do on machine A but do it on Machine B as well.

I do large amounts of video encoding and i use Windoze apps for it with about 6-7 machines all running at once. I use VNC as my interface for those network machines.

If you can find software that does batch work you'll find you can do a shitload more video with everything running overnight.

fuxu · 01-25-2003, 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Muff
Thanks for the info guys.

Did some searching on beowulf clustering seems a little advanced for someone with no unix experience.

Soul I'll trade you 1 digit UIN for the super computer?

do people still sell AOL IM names on ebay? LOL. I can develope some software for you to use with FreeBSD if you want. I can also set up everything for you if you're local. Let me know

01-25-2003, 12:59 PM	#1
Muff Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Toronto Posts: 1,782	Two computers one task??? I have some video work I am doing and it is a slow and menial task. I have a couple computers here a dual p3 1.0 and a p4 2.4 I wanna know if it's possible to network them so they can work on one task together using all of their CPU together?

01-25-2003, 01:07 PM	#2
gothweb Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Back in the USSA Posts: 8,849	It is possible, but generally if you only have two computers, it isn't worth it. If you have a larger bank, and the tasks can be run on UNIX, you can do some amazing stuff. __________________ Photos by Ian X.: Distinctive photos of goth babes. Blood Money:Your traffic, my sites, our money. MojoHost: Still the best.

01-25-2003, 01:29 PM	#6
WiredGuy Pounding Googlebot Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Canada Posts: 34,509	Distributed computing isn't very windows friendly. Unix on the other hand no problem. My recommendation would be to launch a video task on each computer for 2 different videos. Just reduce the amount of encoding your doing by spreading the videos on each machine. Not much else you can do under a windows environment. WG __________________ I play with Google.

01-25-2003, 02:47 PM	#12
Libertine sex dwarf Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 17,860	If you don't know Linux at all, I would suggest mandrake (or maybe redhat). Very simple, almost as simple as windows even. freebsd and debian would most likely not be very suitable for someone new to linux, and in my opinion mandrake and redhat are easier to learn than suse. __________________ /(bb\|[^b]{2})/

01-25-2003, 01:08 PM	#3
Theo HAL 9000 Industry Role: Join Date: May 2001 Posts: 34,515	i sale cheap IBM supercomputer only $390

01-25-2003, 01:10 PM	#4
chupacabra Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 3,626	muff, not w/ windows... i assume your encoding software all runs on windows? you could look into setting up a beowulf cluster, but you'd have to come up w/ *nix solutions to your encoding needs. i have 4 P4 1.8GHz systems set up in a Beowulf cluster that i do some encoding tasks, but i did have to set up quite a bit of scripting to make it work properly... there is no painless way to set up what you need however, do some searching on 'beowulf clustering' if you want to get some more info..

01-25-2003, 01:21 PM	#5
Muff Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Toronto Posts: 1,782	Thanks for the info guys. Did some searching on beowulf clustering seems a little advanced for someone with no unix experience. Soul I'll trade you 1 digit UIN for the super computer?