of course its not right and of course it shouldn't be like that but reality is, in some cases dress is a factor. i don't think anyone is saying someone who dresses that way deserves it or that its the main factor, just that it can be and has been a factor in a certain % of rape/sexual assault cases.

If I dont take my slut for a walk, she scratches the door and pees on the carpet...

LOL at this thread, coming from a forum that prefers to call females bitches rather than women.

Who the fuck cares whose FAULT it is? Does laying the blame on the fuckwad who did the raping make it all better? Laying blame where it belongs doesn't make the woman any less raped.

If a person is stupid for walking through a questionable area and getting robbed, why would it be any different for someone wanting to avoid being raped? You do what is necessary to protect yourself instead of marching in a worthless parade that will produce zero results. Eesh...

I'm not mad. Disgusted, yes, mad no. I am all for sluts too and love admitting to my own inner slut. I just don't think anyone "deserves" to be raped and find sarcasm about it to be just plain insensitive... and uncalled for... even in a place called GFY.

We got off topic. What I was originally pointing out was that even though it may not be fair or right, people react what they see.

While not foolproof, there may be some merit to not dressing in a sexually provocative manner to avoid sexual harassment or rape.

A person does not "deserve" to be raped because she or he dresses a certain way, or acts a certain way, or anything else. The perception people have that is the case is why so many rapists get off scot free. It is just plain fucked up. You wouldn't say it is ok to steal from someone just because he has money and you "deserve" it more than he "deserves" it. It is never ok to take sex from someone without his or her consent. Never.

I seriously can't believe I have to explain this.

Until you actually know someone that has been raped you unfortunately probably will never understand.

Nobody deserves crime, as stated above it is often prudent to act defensively. This is no different than defensive driving.

Dammit Far-L ... WHy you gotta go n be all full of logic n shit...

no, it's a sex crime. A hate crime is attacking someone based on you hating their kind. So not sure how you have created a separation there...

nobody here is saying they deserve it, you just went down that slippery slope all on your own.

You're all sluts and rape is bad.

Attire does not mitigate the crime, and I dont think anyone but a defense attorney is claiming it would.

ie: to advise "drive defensively" is not to say "otherwise it's your fault".

San Francisco (Date/Time/Place TBA):

http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot...2_357646_n.jpg

Slut Walk SF Bay Facebook


Austin (Tomorrow 5/11/11): Slut Walk Austin Facebook

ADG

So rapists must love those rape victims right? And the victims must love being raped - why else would they walk around trolling like some sort of bait just waiting to be snapped up by the first big fat catfish to swim along... smart enough to jump on that shit... yeah boyeeeeeee....

Rape is a crime of violence and brutality. That makes it a hate crime. You need to get into the 21st century.

all those women who have sex with their students, or anything else going on, aren't actually raping them?

Nor are most of them being charged with rape. Lewd conduct with a minor is related but not the same as rape. Feel free to consult with an attorney if you don't want to take my word for it.

I was under the impression this was statutory rape. Is this not the same as regular old rape. Or rape rape as Whoopi Goldberg would like to say? So if you were raped by your teacher and it wasn't violent that is just lewd and not so much rape?

why would i do that? you said it yourself, 'most', meaning it is rape and the legal mumbo jumbo is moving away from that to confirm a conviction or plea deal.

ok so you're not posting all indiginified about children having 'lewd conduct perpetrated on them' or whatever you're claiming here

what about the bills in the south where rape victims have to report their encounters to the IRS and if the rape victims don't 'fight back' or some legal drivel, they are unable to receive funding for abortions

has that even been mentioned on this board? isn't that better defined as a 'hate crime' or 'hate laws'?

if you'd like to talk to an attorney about that, i'd highly suggest it.

In an ideal world females could wear anything and not have to worry. Since we do not live in a perfect world, some people advise others to err on the side of caution.

if im wearing a shirt that says 'i sell cocaine and have lots of it in my pockets' and some dudes jump me and rob me, i understand that the guys shouldn't have robbed me but i shouldn't have been wearing that shirt

so should the police say 'don't dress like a drug dealer and you won't be treated like one'? of course they should, so what's the difference?

rape is wrong just like mugging someone is wrong but if im walking around with my tits hanging out and my pussy just barely hidden its like me saying 'i have sex for sale and i have tits and a fat juicy pussy right here on me' so yeah you're gonna get raped if the wrong person comes by. is it right? no.

just like you shouldnt walk around with the i have cocaine in my pocket shirt you shouldn't walk around looking like a whore or you may draw unwanted attention

Go look up what is meant by "statutory" and then we can talk. Very different in the eyes of the law which is why there is a way to segregate them accordingly in order to pass reasonable judgement and assess punishments with respect to the crime.

ie, 'impossible to rape a man' or in this case, boy

gotcha.

Thx for the info. ADG! Guess I need to head downtown tomorrow evening!

Hopefully the SF one will happen close or on top of my show in late June in SF.

You obviously don't have a clue what you are talking about so don't pretend to have a clue what I am talking about.

Thats funny!

'Originally Posted by _Richard_ View Post
all those women who have sex with their students, or anything else going on, aren't actually raping them?
Originally Posted by _Far-L_ View Post
Nor are most of them being charged with rape. Lewd conduct with a minor is related but not the same as rape. Feel free to consult with an attorney if you don't want to take my word for it.'

i am sorry if i have misunderstood your meaning here.

it appears you're not really following what you yourself are saying, so no, i obviously have no clue at all.

Then allow me to clarify...

Most of those students are consensually having sex but the fact that they are not of an age to legally have the right to consent without the permission of an adult parent and/or guardian makes the difference. Big difference than someone who at any age or time or place is not consenting to any sexual conduct and being forced or coerced mentally, emotionally, or physically...

Get it now?

Now go back to being the Lone Ranger on the Booger Patrol and stop trying to mince words with me just to impress your minions. The more you try to flip what I am saying around the more you look like a sniveling little snipe with a keyboard to wield and a screen to hide behind.

Gonna try and score on a little of that sweet Tejas slut action, eh? :winkwink:

http://static.funnyjunk.com/pictures...d_toilets2.jpg

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_TFSRRkSH6I...g_like_man.jpg

ADG

you just said it again!

fmi, what state allows the right to give permission for minors to screw people in authority?

cause that's pretty fucked up

Then why do they call it rape? Why don't they just call it Statutory Sexy Time? Or Statutory "not really but we are still gonna call it" Rape.

We want to live in a society where the police decide how we can dress?

Not as a Muslim, not as sexy girl, not as a "drug dealer", don't dress black in a white area, don't dress white in a black one ?

Stop and Search statistics point to how many young Asians and Black refuse to take police advice to dress white.

Yes we should all dress in suits, after all thats what the biggest criminals wear.

BINGO! :thumbsup

Stupid is as stupid does momma always used to say.

Of course it is a form of rape if an adult takes advantage of a minor. Do you and goofball think I am saying differently?

Why?

You are both too ridiculously over-zealously trying to twist what I am saying into something else and completely missing the point.

Statutory rape is obviously still a form of rape in the eyes of most western cultures. Now why don't you both move to Saudi Arabia or Pakistan where rape is a woman's fault and families can kill their dirty little whore daughters for deserving it and costing families their honor.
:321GFY

bingo what?

this is what she said:

"Most of those students are consensually having sex but the fact that they are not of an age to legally have the right to consent without the permission of an adult parent and/or guardian makes the difference."

which is quite clearly trivializing the definition of rape, and blaming the victim.

keep in mind she is just now admitting that this is in fact rape, although it is not brutal nor violent.

and i'm not entirely sure what your deal is, but why you have reverted to third grade insults is confusing.

Heads up: "she" is actually a male castrated by political correctness.

http://img.avn.com/ip/padthumb/235/1...8628F4454E.jpg

err my bad.. assumptions about the 'inner slut' reference i suppose

anyway, i won't stand for being called the lone ranger on a booger patrol.

won't stand i say.