GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Bin Laden 'was unarmed when shot' (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1021004)

Rangermoore 05-03-2011 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vick! (Post 18106074)
No one is going to understand this point. This is exactly what terrorist mentality is, Osama and company had the same, some of these people have the same.

Its just perspective that makes difference between a terrorist and a patriot/hero.

Well your certainly not a patriot.. I agree with one thing you have said.. If the way I think makes me a terrorist then I will gladly take that name.. How does it feel that I am being paid by your tax dollars to think and act that way? Just think, every time I am called to action, no matter by a govt contract or paid through the military YOU are paying me, and very well I might say...LMFAO... In fact I have another contract coming up in late June, so thank you in advance.. I will be sure to make good use of my skills and ammo.. I will allow a few extra folks to meet their god this time and think of you as they take their last breath.. As your tax dollars are being deposited in my bank account.... So I get the last laugh.... LOL :321GFY

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 05-04-2011 01:19 AM

Wow, it almost sounds like Obama's critics are happy that President Obama was serious about pursuing Bin Laden, as opposed to Bush or McCain:





ADG

just a punk 05-04-2011 02:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 18105749)
Bin Laden 'was unarmed when shot'

How can I repeat the same thing over and over again during all 10 years...

OSAMA CAN NOT BE TAKEN ALIVE BECAUSE HE IS A CIA AGENT AND EVERYTHING HE DID, WAS DIRECTED BY THE US GOVERNMENT.

Period.

JFK 05-04-2011 02:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crak_JMan (Post 18106156)
I think when sarcasm was introduced at school you weren't paying any attention :upsidedow

First of all I am Canadian and I did not wish anyone any arm or revenge but very happy that evil man as been dealt with.

But I honestly think you are reaching here man taking every post in your thread on GFY so personally :winkwink:

that's a very unchristian reply, you Canadian, YOU:Oh crap

moeloubani 05-04-2011 02:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyberxxx (Post 18106961)
How can I repeat the same thing over and over again during all 10 years...

OSAMA CAN NOT BE TAKEN ALIVE BECAUSE HE IS A CIA AGENT AND EVERYTHING HE DID, WAS DIRECTED BY THE US GOVERNMENT.

Period.

This is probably closer to the truth than any other hypothesis I've read.

You can't put someone like that in court and let them say what they will. The media will listen and things that they don't want known, like the US government ordering terrorist attacks, would quickly come out.

just a punk 05-04-2011 02:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SallyRand (Post 18106169)
Bet me, you murdering bastard!

Do you REALLY think that he was able to prepare and accomplish everything ALONE? Without support of the US secret service? C'mon! :upsidedow

just a punk 05-04-2011 02:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moeloubani (Post 18106968)
You can't put someone like that in court and let them say what they will. The media will listen and things that they don't want known, like the US government ordering terrorist attacks, would quickly come out.

He knew too much. If even a part of this information has leaked from the court, I bet that White House with everyone inside was immediately smashed by the angry american people. :2 cents:

Paul Markham 05-04-2011 03:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamianJ (Post 18105792)
Shot in the head in front of his 12 year old little girl and he was unarmed and willing to come quietly.

AMERICA FUCK YEAH!

You would shit your pants in anything remotely like that situation.

The Navy Seals are like our SAS, they are a special breed and trained to a level that makes them very good at one thing. Killing people.

This was a pressure situation, they were in the dark, entering a hostile zone and had already taken fire and returned fire. They were not asking questions, they were doing what they are trained to do. Kill with an instant to think about it.

If it was so terrible that Bin Laden's daughter saw him killed, whose fault is that?

The Seals for protecting themselves or Bin Laden for having his children there?

He had one option, to lay down on the floor with his hands over his head and hope they weren't sent to execute him. Otherwise he was gambling.

NewNick 05-04-2011 03:27 AM

I like the way they shot him, his wife, and his daughter (all unarmed), and then thought they should identify him.

Call me picky but should it not have been the other way around.

GatorB 05-04-2011 04:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vick! (Post 18105990)
I agree. Bombing would have killed many innocent neighbors too.

Alson bombing the buiding would have destroyed computers and other evidence of Al Queda future plans and other info.

livexxx 05-04-2011 04:49 AM

He probably couldn't get to a gun if he was hooked up on his dialysis and anyway as for the kid, I don't know what kind of parent he was, but I wouldn't exactly take my kids to a terrorist camp. It's kind of like asking for trouble, not that I have been to one knowingly, but I do know that guns, grenades and rifles aren't laying around at Disneyland. Surely the emphasis should be on what a bad mother and father they are taking their kids to places that are likely to be the venue for a frickin firefight and raising them there. Haven't they heard of boarding schools the cheapskates. Deserved to be shot just for that.

DamianJ 05-04-2011 05:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vick! (Post 18106016)
Oh yeah, this is the only fucking way to remove the child from scenario. yeah?

They better had killed the child as well. She deserved that, because she was daughter of a terrorist. right?

Rape her first, to really teach the cunt a lesson. She needs to learn.

bronco67 05-04-2011 06:46 AM

Bottom line --- it was a legal kill. Armed or un-armed. Obama did not want him captured. Can you imagine the extra shit he would have to deal with if the Elvis of terrorists was paraded around the US court system and all over TV? Alive, Bin Laden still has power over his flock. He's just a carcass in the ocean now.

He was set to be assassinated from the start, no matter what took place in the compound.

Smart, smart move by Obama not taking prisoner.

Black All Through 05-04-2011 06:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NaughtyRob (Post 18105786)
Twin towers were unarmed too, fuck him.

:2 cents:

2intense 05-04-2011 07:02 AM

copy - paste :disgust

DWB 05-04-2011 07:34 AM

Good. They should have offed everyone in the house, women and children included. Maybe even the neighbors for assisting in hiding him. The US military does shit like this every day in various locals around the world. Why should Osama and family be spared, armed or not? Kill them all, let Allah sort 'em out.

There are some situations where you go all out, and this was one of them. And they need to release the photos or I'm calling shenanigans.

To play devils advocate, I'm sure they could have pulled a wealth of info from him eventually if they would have taken him alive, which they could have done if they really wanted to.

Either way, good riddance to the guy.

CaptainHowdy 05-04-2011 07:39 AM

All it's fair in ...

PR_Glen 05-04-2011 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 18106138)
what a strange thing to say.

if your christian then why would you not pray for his family. i would presumer you would wish them well? surly your not going to wish harm on the inicent?

i hope as a good american you would not be seeking revenge on children or women who (unless there is evedence) have done no wrong.

Please do not post such silly posts.

silly posts? you are the same person that was posting every 10 minutes that the world was ending when that earthquake/tsunami hit Japan, maybe you should read your own shit before you criticize others?

You are crying over a gunned down murderer, how about you choose your battles more wisely?

SmokeyTheBear 05-04-2011 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rangermoore (Post 18106762)
Once again you prove to be a moron:321GFY

because you cant handle the truth ? your only comeback is neener neener ? :1orglaugh

the truth sucks doesn't it...

SmokeyTheBear 05-04-2011 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 18107466)
Bottom line --- it was a legal kill. Armed or un-armed.

can you show us this law and the legal process behind it ?

SmokeyTheBear 05-04-2011 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by livexxx (Post 18107163)
I don't know what kind of parent he was, but I wouldn't exactly take my kids to a terrorist camp.

he was in a house, much like we have all across america ..

TisMe 05-04-2011 08:24 AM

"Bin Laden 'was unarmed when shot' "

So were most of the people he caused to be killed over the years.

SmokeyTheBear 05-04-2011 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TisMe (Post 18107751)
"Bin Laden 'was unarmed when shot' "

So were most of the people he caused to be killed over the years.

so were most of the people bush and obama ordered killed :2 cents:

Supz 05-04-2011 09:21 AM

who cares?

Supz 05-04-2011 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 18107898)
so were most of the people bush and obama ordered killed :2 cents:

What about the people bin laden killed that started the war? Ignorance is bliss, isnt it.

alessergod 05-04-2011 09:33 AM

:BangBang: :BangBang: who's next?

SmokeyTheBear 05-04-2011 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Supz (Post 18107926)
What about the people bin laden killed that started the war? Ignorance is bliss, isnt it.

what about the people usa killed before bin laden killed anyone. ?

ignorance is bliss u say ? u must be very blissful :)

perhaps you should do some historical research before you make yourself look sillier :)

bin laden used to be on our team, your tax dollars paid his salary and bought his weapons.

Paul Markham 05-04-2011 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 18108070)
what about the people usa killed before bin laden killed anyone. ?

ignorance is bliss u say ? u must be very blissful :)

perhaps you should do some historical research before you make yourself look sillier :)

bin laden used to be on our team, your tax dollars paid his salary and bought his weapons.

What about that Cain killing his brother Abel?

This is part of a war that's been going on for millennium. Going back 10, 20, 30 years. Is like comparing a second to the whole day.

Agent 488 05-04-2011 10:26 AM

rip dude.

TisMe 05-04-2011 10:50 AM

Smokey, you are indeed a master of arguing on message boards.

Create "facts" out of thin air, declare yourself the winner.

Congrats to you.

merina0803 05-04-2011 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 18105725)
Al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden was unarmed when he was killed by US troops on Sunday after resisting capture, the White House has said.

Meanwhile, the CIA has said it did not tell Pakistan about the operation for fear the Pakistanis would leak information and jeopardise the mission.

Pakistan's intelligence agency, the ISI, says it is embarrassed by its failures on Bin Laden.

The Pakistani government denies any prior knowledge of the raid.

Bin Laden, aged 54, was the founder and leader of al-Qaeda. He is believed to have ordered the attacks on New York and Washington on 11 September 2001, as well as a number of other deadly bombings.

Al-Qaeda clues

Mr Carney said Bin Laden's wife "rushed" the first US assaulter who entered the room where they were, and was shot in the leg but not killed. On Monday, White House officials said the woman was killed in the firefight after Bin Laden used her as a human shield.

"We expected a great deal of resistance and were met with a great deal of resistance. There were many other people who were armed in the compound," Mr Carney said.

Bin Laden himself then resisted the troops and was shot dead, but was not armed, he added.

The CIA is already examining material seized in the raid, including computer hard drives, DVDs and other documents.

No decision had yet been taken on whether to release a photograph of Bin Laden's body, Mr Carney said, conceding that the image was "pretty gruesome" and could inflame some sensitivities.

A Time magazine article, billed as Mr Panetta's first interview since Bin Laden was killed, reports that "the CIA ruled out participating with its nominal South Asian ally early on".

It quotes Mr Panetta as saying "it was decided that any effort to work with the Pakistanis could jeopardise the mission. They might alert the targets".

Pakistan received $1.3bn (£786m) in US military and humanitarian aid last year, and provides logistical support for the Nato mission in Afghanistan. However, relations between Islamabad and Washington have been strained by US suspicions that the ISI is covertly backing militants in Afghanistan, and by anger over US drone strikes in Pakistani tribal areas.

Pakistan's foreign ministry has defended the ISI and issued ia lengthy statement in which it expressed "deep concerns and reservations" about the unilateral US action.

Insisting that unilateral action should not become the norm, the ministry stressed that Pakistani intelligence had been sharing information with the US in recent years.

"As far as the target compound is concerned, ISI had been sharing information with CIA and other friendly intelligence agencies since 2009."

Earlier, an ISI official told the BBC's Owen Bennett-Jones in Islamabad that the agency raided the compound in Abbottabad, just 100km (62 miles) from the capital, when it was under construction. It was believed an al-Qaeda operative, Abu Faraj al-Libi, was there.

But since then, "the compound was not on our radar, it is an embarrassment for the ISI", the official said. "We're good, but we're not God."

The compound is just a few hundred metres from the Pakistan Military Academy - the country's equivalent of Sandhurst or West Point.

The US has not commented on anyone it captured or had planned to capture, other than saying it had taken Bin Laden's body.

However, the Pakistani foreign ministry statement said that the rest of Bin Laden's family are now "in safe hands and being looked after in accordance with the law".

Earlier, in ian opinion piece in the Washington Post, President Asif Ali Zardari admitted Bin Laden "was not anywhere we had anticipated he would be".

But he denied the killing suggested Pakistan was failing in its efforts to tackle terrorism.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-13274176

pretty sure passengers on those downed planes were unarmed too

Ice-nine 05-04-2011 12:25 PM

What a fucking shame.
lol

DWB 05-04-2011 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 18108070)
what about the people usa killed before bin laden killed anyone. ?

ignorance is bliss u say ? u must be very blissful :)

perhaps you should do some historical research before you make yourself look sillier :)

bin laden used to be on our team, your tax dollars paid his salary and bought his weapons.

The USA has murdered many more than Osama could in 1000 lifetimes. But you'll never get a US president to go down on war crimes. I'd personally like to see both Bush and Obama imprisoned for war crimes, but it will never happen.

And yes, Osama was trained and funded by the USA at one time.

Funny how all that works.

Supz 05-04-2011 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 18108070)
what about the people usa killed before bin laden killed anyone. ?

ignorance is bliss u say ? u must be very blissful :)

perhaps you should do some historical research before you make yourself look sillier :)

bin laden used to be on our team, your tax dollars paid his salary and bought his weapons.

America gave weapons to afghanistan to protect them from people attacking there country. But as far as paid salary, you are the one that needs to do research, osama bin ladens family as well as him are very wealthy from construction. His muslim views got him large road building jobs in africa, which made him wealthy, which has funded al queda.

If you are just a hippy tree hugger that thinks no matter what people do, you should not go to war. I can see where your line of thinking comes from, but this is war.

MediaGuy 05-04-2011 12:57 PM

And the story begins to morph into it's final official version... which may take any shape that suits them now they've announced no images will be released...

Supposedly a lot of people were watching the raid, live, as it happened... but a lot of the initial details and even broad strokes originally reported are being changed, when they're not being challenged by non-official witnesses.

What's next? Pulling out of the mid-east, and peace, or another 9/11 and more war?

:D

just a punk 05-04-2011 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 18108582)
The USA has murdered many more than Osama could in 1000 lifetimes. But you'll never get a US president to go down on war crimes. I'd personally like to see both Bush and Obama imprisoned for war crimes, but it will never happen.

I concur :2 cents:

just a punk 05-04-2011 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Supz (Post 18108606)
America gave weapons to afghanistan to protect them from people attacking there country.

But the USA stopped giving it when attacked Afghanistan (FYI: the country names should be written with a capital letter) themselves. Ah these old good double standards :1orglaugh

epagos 05-04-2011 01:06 PM

The people in the WTC buildings were also unarmed. fuck ben laden.

just a punk 05-04-2011 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by epagos (Post 18108661)
The people in the WTC buildings were also unarmed. fuck ben laden.

So who gave the weapon to Taliban? Perhaps this video will give you some clue...



Questions?

Sagi 05-04-2011 01:22 PM

I think he was shot because if he was ever brought to trial either military tribunal or even worse civil a lot of our dirty secrets will come out. We created him and funded him to fight the Russians. He knows too much and there is no way we would have wanted to deal with the ramifications of any trial.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123