Ex selling naked Jennifer Lopez videos to porn site

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DVTimes
    xxx
    • Jun 2003
    • 31650

    #1

    Ex selling naked Jennifer Lopez videos to porn site

    SUPERSTAR Jennifer Lopez's first husband was last night said to be nearing a mega deal to sell their honeymoon videos to a porn site.
    But her lawyers were hoping to block it by enforcing a permanent injunction the singer took out to stop Ojani Noa releasing the tapes, in which she appears naked.

    Noa, who was married to J-Lo for 11 months in 1997, found a legal loophole last week in his battle to cash in.

    A Los Angeles judge backed his girlfriend Claudia Vazquez who bought 27 hours of footage, including 20 minutes of nudity, for a dollar (about 60p) from Noa.

    She claims that J-Lo was harming her livelihood by blocking work on a planned film incorporating the tapes.

    Noa's manager Ed Meyer said bids started "in the hundreds of thousands" and were expected to rocket.

    Boasting of porn sites that wanted the tapes, he said: "If an offer looks good we'll definitely take it."

    Kate Miller of Pornhub, the X-rated equivalent of YouTube, said they had already allocated a place in their celeb section.

    Meyer insisted Noa could market the steamy footage because J-Lo gave him permission to film her and gave him the tapes when they split.

    J-Lo, now married to singer Marc Anthony, plans to appeal against the judge's ruling. Noa has been fighting to release the tapes since 2007.


    http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...porn-site.html
    XXX
  • 2intense
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Dec 2009
    • 12507

    #2
    copy -------> paste
    Most Affordable Firewall & Malware Protection for Linux Servers

    Comment

    • JFK
      FUBAR the ORIGINATOR
      • Jan 2002
      • 67369

      #3
      wonder if it will happen ?

      FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX
      For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com

      Comment

      • L-Pink
        working on my tan
        • Mar 2005
        • 39151

        #4
        I have tapes of ex girlfriends, taken with their permission but no release or 2257's. Are you telling me I can publish them? I don't think so.

        Comment

        • iamtam
          So Fucking Banned
          • Feb 2010
          • 1211

          #5
          this is where we get to find out that her ass wasn't all that hot, just big and well shaped by her spanx.

          Comment

          • merina0803
            Registered User
            • May 2008
            • 573

            #6
            Originally posted by L-Pink
            I have tapes of ex girlfriends, taken with their permission but no release or 2257's. Are you telling me I can publish them? I don't think so.
            yes.. but only if you were UNDER under 18 and then xvideos will handle the rest.

            Comment

            • Internet User
              So Fucking Banned
              • May 2011
              • 544

              #7
              Originally posted by 2intense
              copy -------> paste
              are broke sigwhores allowed on GFY?

              Comment

              • Chosen
                • Aug 2001
                • 63151

                #8
                Looking forward to watch the vids

                Comment

                • DBS.US
                  Geo Cities
                  • Aug 2003
                  • 11842

                  #9
                  What "legal loophole" did he find?
                  Have an unused domain? Make a Free Chaturbate White Label site and be making money tonight

                  Comment

                  • Wizzo
                    2011 GFY Hall of Fame!
                    • Nov 2000
                    • 15224

                    #10
                    Originally posted by JFK
                    wonder if it will happen ?
                    Sources tell me it will...
                    Looking for Opportunity!

                    Comment

                    • InfoGuy
                      80/20 Rule
                      • Apr 2010
                      • 3052

                      #11
                      Originally posted by L-Pink
                      I have tapes of ex girlfriends, taken with their permission but no release or 2257's. Are you telling me I can publish them? I don't think so.
                      No you can't publish them. All of the legal actions are smokescreens to generate publicity and controversy. Unless the tape is only released outside of the US, J-Lo will have to sign the model release and provide ID for 2257 records. When sales start slowing down, the 2 parties will probably announce an out of court settlement for an undisclosed sum, to generate more publicity and sales.
                      Support American Heroes | How Bad is My Batch? | Vaccine Deaths & Adverse Reactions | Free Speech Coalition | <WARNING> ePayService / Guerra Capital, INC / MTACC payments | Flirt4Free Fucks their Affiliates | Don't do business with piece of shit Andy Alvarez from Webmaster Central / VR3000, who said:
                      "If it was up to me, they would have shot all 30,000 of those country loving shitheads"

                      Comment

                      Working...