IP per domain?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • thelanman
    Registered User
    • Jul 2007
    • 37

    #1

    IP per domain?

    Should one buy an IP for each domain?
    ICQ# 431537820

    NotchFinder LinkEx

    Best Camel Toes Linkex
  • CYF
    Coupon Guru
    • Mar 2009
    • 10973

    #2
    You can, but you don't have to.

    Google does not penalize websites on the same ip.
    Webmaster Coupons Coupons and discounts for hosting, domains, SSL Certs, and more!
    AmeriNOC Coupons | Certified Hosting Coupons | Hosting Coupons | Domain Name Coupons

    Comment

    • kostas
      Confirmed User
      • Jan 2006
      • 616

      #3
      It is better for SE

      Comment

      • pornguy
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Mar 2003
        • 62912

        #4
        the IP´s do not matter as much as the range. If you have 10 sites you are trying to get listed then they should be spread over a range of IP´s
        PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic

        AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
        TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!

        Comment

        • thelanman
          Registered User
          • Jul 2007
          • 37

          #5
          Well I got a little over 40. I always assumed that 1 IP should be ok for a few domains but don't feel it would be good to have all there. You think as long as I don't cross link between my personal names that it should be ok?

          Better yet I'll just get IPs for the important ones.
          ICQ# 431537820

          NotchFinder LinkEx

          Best Camel Toes Linkex

          Comment

          • Lassitor
            Confirmed User
            • Jun 2009
            • 278

            #6
            Most IPS's meter the IP address, not the domain name. If you have a lot of binaries (photos and video) then you will want to spread them out to different servers and IP's. Most ISP's give you a good rate for your account, but if you go over the bandwidth allocation you really get hit with extra fees. Beware that an ISP will simply turn off your account if it really eats in to them.

            So, a lot of Adult webmasters will have the HTML code on one server, but the binaries spread out across many other servers. That way if they spread out the bandwidth so that they seldom get hit with bandwidth charges and if one host goes down or pulls the plug on them they are not totally dead.

            Hotlinking is a big problem with a lot of adult websites...Your photos will start showing up in a lot of blogs and other adult websites paid by YOU! If you can, you should limit what countries your binaries are allowed to go to. No need to send them to China!

            Comment

            • Agent 488
              Registered User
              • Feb 2006
              • 22511

              #7
              don't cross link your shit.

              don't share an ip with shady shit.

              Comment

              • Mr Gump
                Registered User
                • Nov 2006
                • 86

                #8
                I don't believe in IPs, i've never seen one in real life, where are they?
                Teen Lesbian Porn Videos

                Comment

                • CaroMark
                  Confirmed User
                  • Sep 2002
                  • 1357

                  #9
                  While IPs seem to have made a difference for many in the past that seems to be less and less of an impact for most and ARIN frowns on allocating IPs based upon a domain only.
                  Mark M, 727-433-0745
                  [email protected] Support is everything!
                  ICQ# 40467849, AIM MMemmer333

                  Comment

                  • raymor
                    Confirmed User
                    • Oct 2002
                    • 3745

                    #10
                    I was once trying to get some more IPs, so I went to all of the top search engine
                    experts asking them to tell me why more IPs would help me with the search engines.
                    All of the experts said it doesn't a bit. You don't want to use the same IP as some
                    egregious spammer, but all of the SE experts said it's perfectly fine to have all of your
                    sites on the same IP. I asked some more probing questions, trying to find some
                    reason that I needed more IPs, but the people who would know all said it didn't matter.
                    I talked to leading SEO experts and to the technical staff from the SEs themselves.

                    As CaroMark indicated, IPs are in short supply, so I'd save your IP requests for when
                    you truly need them.




                    I hope the poster doesn't take personal offense, but this one comment is just
                    so completely wrong in so many ways that I had to post the correct information:
                    So, a lot of Adult webmasters will have the HTML code on one server, but the binaries spread out across many other servers. That way if they spread out the bandwidth so that they seldom get hit with bandwidth charges and if one host goes down or pulls the plug on them they are not totally dead.
                    Think about that for a second - the HTML on one server and the images on another.
                    If EITHER ONE goes down the site is fucked. That just doubles your chance for
                    problems because problems with either host make the site useless. What good is
                    a porn site that's just HTML and no pictures? No good at all. Of course that also
                    causes more administrative hassle - you have two log into two different hosts just
                    to edit one page. Much better from a reliability standpoint and much less hassle is to
                    put some SITES on one server and another SITE on another server, but keep each
                    site together, so a whole site is up as long as one server is up.

                    Also bandwidth wise that idea makes no sense whatever. A typical HTML page
                    is maybe 4K of HTML with 100K+ of graphics and other "binaries". Storing that 4K,
                    the HTML, somewhere else isn't going to make the page load any faster - it's only
                    the 100K+ of images that are going to take any time at all to load.

                    In fact, if you carefully watch your browser status bar, you'll see it typically takes
                    longer looking up the DNS then it does retrieving the HTML. By using two domain
                    names, you double the time required for DNS lookups and make your site slower.

                    There are other problems and hassles caused by spreading media that way which
                    come up in different situations, but we've covered enough for now. For now it's
                    enough to point out that putting html and one server and media on another is
                    slower, less reliable, and more hassle. (Security issues are another reason).
                    For historical display only. This information is not current:
                    support@bettercgi.com ICQ 7208627
                    Strongbox - The next generation in site security
                    Throttlebox - The next generation in bandwidth control
                    Clonebox - Backup and disaster recovery on steroids

                    Comment

                    Working...