Dear Google...

[teeheiman]

Thank you for dropping my sites out of the search engine for poor quality content.

The pages you do rank truly do have better content than mine and deserve to out rank me.
familyland.net/community/index.php?topic=57353.0

Sincerely,

I fucking hate you

[CamsMaster]

lol... sorry to hear that.. did you sent them this letter ? there isn't only google existing around you know >? try some other SE, is good an quality traffic if you know where and how to search... cheers

[Chris]

lol with adwords support this morning at the end of the call the lady asked was there anything else she could help me with andi asked if she could turn the panda algo off and she laughed and said im not the only one that has asked lol

[carzygirls]

go to google forum... you will be inundated with reply's about how bad you suck and should have better quality and to stop breaking the rules.

Here is the responses you will get:

1) I see that you have canonical issues
2) Provide quality site because I see ... blah blah worthless comments inserted here
3) Did you read the "Guidelines"?
4) You have a lot of errors in your source code... check worthless url here to fix.
5) There are also a lot of yahoos that will tell you your site is not as good as the top so look at there sites to see what they do

There is only 1 guy on that entire forum worth a shit... his name is Phil... find him and ask him wtf to do

[Chris]

lol i want to smash my keyboard when i read the google forums

it makes this place look like childs play lol

[Agent 488]

google forums most useless forum known to man.

[AzteK]

lol i want to smash my keyboard when i read the google forums

it makes this place look like childs play lol

for real, that place annoys the hell out of me

[MetaMan]

All quality sites were boosted ahead. All shitty low quality sites lost ranking. Do the math.

[teeheiman]

All quality sites were boosted ahead. All shitty low quality sites lost ranking. Do the math.

did you even look at that url I provided? lol

[TeenCat]

i am sure google is listening to you right now right here, at your command sir ... better go and listen to him doesnt matter what he talks about, listen and try to understand

[MetaMan]

did you even look at that url I provided? lol

there is like 2.5k pages of content, what is it you're saying?

[Agent 488]

All quality sites were boosted ahead. All shitty low quality sites lost ranking. Do the math.

not true at all if you knew anything about the latest update.

who decides if a google update actually delivered better results? google does.

it's a closed feedback loop.

[MetaMan]

not true at all if you knew anything about the latest update.

who decides if a google update actually delivered better results? google does.

it's a closed feedback loop.

Everyone i know with properly developed sites, who took the time with content and structured link building over the years had their rankings boosted up.

this may not go for everyone. but most of the people i see complaining about it have low quality sites.

no one knows the algorithm fully in and out. but if google did the update to pull better results the fact is that the majority of newer serps will have better results. that is the entire point of the update.

[fatfoo]

It's bad for you Google did not like your site. Good luck. In some cases, you can email Google to have your ranking restored.

[roganoli]

Everyone i know with properly developed sites, who took the time with content and structured link building over the years had their rankings boosted up.

this may not go for everyone. but most of the people i see complaining about it have low quality sites.

no one knows the algorithm fully in and out. but if google did the update to pull better results the fact is that the majority of newer serps will have better results. that is the entire point of the update.

This in not correct... RabbitsReviews is a quality site their SERP has dropped at Google! He was on the first page for any porn pay site name and I can not find it anymore!

[carzygirls]

phil payne for OP use

[MetaMan]

This in not correct... RabbitsReviews is a quality site their SERP has dropped at Google! He was on the first page for any porn pay site name and I can not find it anymore!

What is not correct?

So because RabbitsReviews is not listed google is not correct? that is hilarious to me.

i said majority not all. i still see quality sites listed for "porn pay site".

[roganoli]

Sorry... my english is horrible! I could not understand his reasoning previous! I do not meant "porn pay site" keyword.

For example... Rabbits was on the first page to "sapphic erotica", "reality kings", "naughty america" and many others and is no longer there! And their reviews is the best in original and quality content.

That's what I meant...

[u-Bob]

google forums most useless forum known to man.

true that.

[MetaMan]

And their reviews is the best in original and quality content.

Says who? you?

[TheDoc]

This update hit a ton of very good quality sites that contained all original content and it boosted some very crap sites as well. That is without question to anyone who watches the serps. Normally major changes like this take a week or two to settle in, and Google normally tweaks a few things once they see it going. So don't hit the panic button just yet.....

[Tom_PM]

MetaMan you are making a point that it's googles decision and thats final. I dont think anyone disagree's with that.

I see a lot of public head scratching and a site like Rabbits should email IMHO to ask WTF is not quality about our site, or words to that effect.

[halfpint]

If I type in the word "porn" in google the first page consists of the biggest tube sites including youtube and myspace lol

If I type in "free porn" the first page consists of the big tube sites

If I type in "amateur porn" the first page consists of the big tube sites and few amateur sites who have uploaded movies to pornhost

If I type in "teen porn" the first page consists of tube sites and a few fake tube tgps


Absolutly awesome

[TheDoc]

MetaMan you are making a point that it's googles decision and thats final. I dont think anyone disagree's with that.

I see a lot of public head scratching and a site like Rabbits should email IMHO to ask WTF is not quality about our site, or words to that effect.

A review is basically nothing more than an aggregated news site... look across the review sites at the same exact reviews. Often the thumbs have the same name - the same shot, sections/niches/sub-sections are the same names, titles are the same, same sponsored content, same sponsor links... even if the update is a 1000 words, half of the words are the same thing across 10 other review sites...

Tubes took a hit because many aren't unique.. they "look" unique, but once you remove the look they're the same content and often words, as 10,000 other tubes.

The major guys didn't take a hit because they buy content now and traffic volume is god.

[Agent 488]

I see a lot of public head scratching and a site like Rabbits should email IMHO to ask WTF is not quality about our site, or words to that effect.

google already said not to bother doing that when panda went worldwide.

[teeheiman]

A review is basically nothing more than an aggregated news site... look across the review sites at the same exact reviews. Often the thumbs have the same name - the same shot, sections/niches/sub-sections are the same names, titles are the same, same sponsored content, same sponsor links... even if the update is a 1000 words, half of the words are the same thing across 10 other review sites...

Tubes took a hit because many aren't unique.. they "look" unique, but once you remove the look they're the same content and often words, as 10,000 other tubes.

The major guys didn't take a hit because they buy content now and traffic volume is god.

This makes a lot of sense, all of my sites hit were review sites, gives me some thinking to do! Thanks