Google Bug

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • digihax
    So Fucking Banned
    • Feb 2003
    • 349

    #1

    Google Bug

    I have a problem with google if you goto google and type in Mistress Kyra Nothing comes up.. but if you type in http://www.mistresskyra.com it shows y77777777777 for the description the problem is this the page has no record of y7777777 anywhere in the original coding but on googles cache'ed version it has it under the body tag..

    Is this a google bug anyone have any ideas on what I can do to correct this mistake of googles.

    Thanks in advance
  • MarkTiarra
    Confirmed User
    • Aug 2002
    • 3833

    #2
    I put in Mistress Kyra and got pages and pages of matches.

    Retired Pornosticator

    Comment

    • digihax
      So Fucking Banned
      • Feb 2003
      • 349

      #3
      Yea but not the original Mistress Kyra which is http://www.mistresskyra.com try putting that inside the search box and hit enter you will see what I mean.. it will say the description is y77777777777777

      Comment

      • DarkJedi
        No Refunds Issued.
        • Feb 2001
        • 28301

        #4
        because http://www.mistresskyra.com has a PR 0

        Comment

        • digihax
          So Fucking Banned
          • Feb 2003
          • 349

          #5
          but why is the description y777777777 that should not be there

          Comment

          • digihax
            So Fucking Banned
            • Feb 2003
            • 349

            #6
            kickin this back to the top really need an answer on this

            Comment

            • PersianKitty
              Meow Media Inc.
              • Jul 2001
              • 7785

              #7
              If you look at the source code of google's cache of your page when you search http://www.mistresskyra.com you'll see the y7877777777777777777777777.

              The cached page is also not the same as the page you currently have up.

              Comment

              • digihax
                So Fucking Banned
                • Feb 2003
                • 349

                #8
                yes exactly any idea why it did that is that a bug in googles software?

                Comment

                • digihax
                  So Fucking Banned
                  • Feb 2003
                  • 349

                  #9

                  Comment

                  • rowan
                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                    • Mar 2002
                    • 17393

                    #10
                    http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:eTCDYzuJSgEC:www.mistresskyra.com/+&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

                    <font face="Courier">
                    &lt;body bgcolor="black"&gt;
                    &lt;div align="center"&gt;
                    y7877777777777777777777777
                    &lt;table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="640"&gt;
                    </font>


                    It's not a google bug. Your page is made up entirely of images, the only real text in that page is "y7877777777777777777777777" near the top. That's why it shows as the complete description. It was probably an editing mistake (cat on keyboard? ) that was overlaid by the images, so it's visible only with a non graphical interface like google.

                    You need to use alt tags for all of your 'text images', or at the least put in a meta description!

                    Comment

                    • funkmaster
                      So Fucking Banned
                      • Sep 2001
                      • 7938

                      #11
                      ... what´s wrong with having " y7877777777777777777777777" as description, I think it´s kinda revolutionairy !!!

                      Comment

                      • digihax
                        So Fucking Banned
                        • Feb 2003
                        • 349

                        #12
                        no no the thing is that is only on google's cache view the actual website page source and you will see it doesnt have that anywhere in it.. has me really confused on this one/

                        Comment

                        • ServerGenius
                          Confirmed User
                          • Feb 2002
                          • 9377

                          #13
                          Originally posted by digihax
                          no no the thing is that is only on google's cache view the actual website page source and you will see it doesnt have that anywhere in it.. has me really confused on this one/
                          The guy most likely used a cloaked page that shows spiders
                          a different version of the page. The spider cached that page
                          and that's why it's different from what you see?

                          DynaMite
                          | http://www.sinnerscash.com/ | ICQ: 370820 | Skype: SinnersCash | AdultWhosWho |

                          Comment

                          • fnet
                            Confirmed User
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 1721

                            #14
                            another reason why it's opportune to engineer freshbot's good graces- shit like this cleans up fast



                            don't sweat it, next month they'll fix you
                            the sound of one hand googlewhacking

                            Comment

                            • digihax
                              So Fucking Banned
                              • Feb 2003
                              • 349

                              #15
                              no I wasnt using any cloaking methods at all infact I was using no cheating techniques. I played fair and got a boot in my behind o'well guess I will wait for the next update.

                              thanks.

                              Comment

                              • Dildozer
                                Confirmed User
                                • Jul 2002
                                • 7519

                                #16
                                Originally posted by funkmaster
                                ... what´s wrong with having " y7877777777777777777777777" as description, I think it´s kinda revolutionairy !!!
                                alot of people search for y787777777777 nowadays
                                Spam link here

                                Comment

                                • Lane
                                  Will code for food...
                                  • Apr 2001
                                  • 8496

                                  #17
                                  funny how people don't know what a "Bug" is, and use the term here and there..

                                  Comment

                                  Working...