32bit vs 64bit Windows

[Davy]

I am sure there are some Windows pros around here that can answer my question:

I upgraded from Vista to Windows 7 today. Before I got Windows 7, I checked if my dual core processor is 64-bit compatible. It showed as compatible, so I installed Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit edition.
I just ran the Windows performance check ("experience index"). It used to be at 4.9 (with memory being the lowest index). Now the CPU performance index is only at 3.6.

Does this mean that I would be better off installing the 32-bit version of Windows 7?
Is my (older) laptop computer not fully compatible with 64-bit?
I don't see any significant loss of performance.

[abshard]

The experience index maybe has a differnet rating scale on the 2 OS's

If you have less then 3.5gigs of ram 32bit is fine.

If have more then 3.5 gigs of ram you need 64bit or the extra ram is wasted.

[ProG]

That's a pretty low score. I get a 6.0 on my old 2.4GHz E6600.

I don't think your problem is with the 64-bit version. Perhaps Windows 7 just calculates the experience index differently than Vista?

[BestXXXPorn]

I think the bar is set higher for 64-bit systems personally and definitely for Windows 7 vs Vista... you should, overall, experience better performance running a 64-bit OS with a 64-bit processor. Especially for CPU intensive 64 bit developed software... Not to mention Windows 7 is leagues better than Vista

I'd stick with Windows 7 :P

[Barefootsies]

The experience index maybe has a differnet rating scale on the 2 OS's

If you have less then 3.5gigs of ram 32bit is fine.

If have more then 3.5 gigs of ram you need 64bit or the extra ram is wasted.

That pretty much sums it up.

I have a couple of 64bit machines for that reason. The extra RAM. It does occasionally add in some complications, but having that extra memory is nice. Especially for all the video rendering and compression I have to do.

[Davy]

Thanks for the info, guys. The laptop is rather old, as you can tell, and Windows 7 was not around when I bought the computer.
Makes sense that Windows 7 calculates the index differently.

It's a little disappointing to see the CPU index so low, but overall, it feels much faster (almost like buying a slightly better PC). I have already configured everything, so I don't want to install the 32-bit version just to see if the performance index is any different...

[Darkcrni]

The experience index maybe has a differnet rating scale on the 2 OS's

If you have less then 3.5gigs of ram 32bit is fine.

If have more then 3.5 gigs of ram you need 64bit or the extra ram is wasted.

Exactly

[Cyandin]

The Windows experience rating is worthless.

My system consists of:

Core2Quad Q6600 @2.5ghz (slightly OC'd)
8GB DDR2-800 RAM
1x150GB 10k SATA WD Raptor HDD
GeForce 9800 GTX+ 1GB DDR3 Video Card
Vista Ultimate 64-bit

(plus external hdd's and other things not connected while running the test)

and it gives me a shitty rating (mind you, no programs are running when i do the test).

[Ethersync]

Perhaps Windows 7 just calculates the experience index differently than Vista?

This.

[GrouchyAdmin]

dude install win3.1 that shit will fly

[Ethersync]

dude install win3.1 that shit will fly

Windows 3.1 flies on this Nexus One

[sandman!]

i run 2 15k sas drives in raid 0 and my lowest score is in the HD speed those tests are worthless

The Windows experience rating is worthless.

My system consists of:

Core2Quad Q6600 @2.5ghz (slightly OC'd)
8GB DDR2-800 RAM
1x150GB 10k SATA WD Raptor HDD
GeForce 9800 GTX+ 1GB DDR3 Video Card
Vista Ultimate 64-bit

(plus external hdd's and other things not connected while running the test)

and it gives me a shitty rating (mind you, no programs are running when i do the test).

[scarlettcontent]

u need to run 64 bit programs to make a difference, most are 32 anyway

[LoveSandra]

The Windows experience rating is worthless.

My system consists of:

Core2Quad Q6600 @2.5ghz (slightly OC'd)
8GB DDR2-800 RAM
1x150GB 10k SATA WD Raptor HDD
GeForce 9800 GTX+ 1GB DDR3 Video Card
Vista Ultimate 64-bit

(plus external hdd's and other things not connected while running the test)

and it gives me a shitty rating (mind you, no programs are running when i do the test).