PIRACY - These programs help fund/support it

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ElConquistador
    Confirmed User
    • Dec 2004
    • 520

    #1

    PIRACY - These programs help fund/support it

    By allowing affiliates to promote them or in buying ad space, these programs are absolutely 100% supporting forums and sites that are literally FILLED with stolen/pirated content. (just starting a list, plz link me if there is already another list going)


    PROGRAM - OFFENDING SITE/URL
    AmateurMatch - http://www.pornbb.org
    ULUST- http://www.pornbb.org
    MOFOs - http://www.pornbb.org
    PUSSYCASH - http://redtube.com
    Sexinyourcity - http://redtube.com
  • Ozarkz
    So Fucking Banned
    • Jan 2009
    • 2377

    #2
    Lots more than that ...

    Comment

    • pornguy
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • Mar 2003
      • 62912

      #3
      Well you just gave them links back. Nice move.
      PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic

      AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
      TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!

      Comment

      • Barefootsies
        Choice is an Illusion
        • Feb 2005
        • 42635

        #4
        Originally posted by Ozarkz
        Lots more than that ...
        Exactly right.

        Welcome to the online adult business champ.
        Should You Email Your Members?

        Link1 | Link2 | Link3

        Enough Said.

        "Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"

        Comment

        • jmcb420
          So Fucking Drunk
          • Oct 2006
          • 2155

          #5
          Originally posted by pornguy
          Well you just gave them links back. Nice move.
          I'm funner than AIDS, and easier to explain to your parents.

          Comment

          • Klen
            • Aug 2006
            • 32235

            #6
            Huh i bet mofos have ratio 1:1000000 on pornbb

            Comment

            • marketsmart
              HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER
              • Dec 2004
              • 20419

              #7
              Originally posted by KlenTelaris
              Huh i bet mofos have ratio 1:1000000 on pornbb
              you'd be wrong...

              Comment

              • ElConquistador
                Confirmed User
                • Dec 2004
                • 520

                #8
                links back in one forum post, big deal. those links aren't doing near the damage the programs are by supporting them... I know it's tough, but try to stay on topic here.

                Comment

                • marketsmart
                  HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER
                  • Dec 2004
                  • 20419

                  #9
                  here's what i dont get... try to submit a watermarked video to the bigger tube sites and they will shit can it unless you are an advertiser or doing pay per upload..

                  a friend of mine submitted a watermarked video to one larger tube site and they even had the balls to email him and say they rejected his video because it was watermarked and he wasnt an advertiser..

                  so, if they can look for watermarks, then why cant they look for theft...

                  finally, what content owner is going to upload his content to a tubesite with no watermark or any means of monetizing his content?

                  the answer is NONE..

                  so, by default, any video that is uploaded by an end user is almost 100% probability stolen or used without copyright holder permission..

                  i keep wondering if this practice doesnt somehow violate the safe harbor act..

                  Comment

                  • ElConquistador
                    Confirmed User
                    • Dec 2004
                    • 520

                    #10
                    [QUOTE=marketsmart;15413514]

                    so, by default, any video that is uploaded by an end user is almost 100% probability stolen or used without copyright holder permission.. [QUOTE]


                    oh without a doubt.
                    but knowing it is one thing - PRVOING it, in a court of law is something else.

                    Comment

                    • Barefootsies
                      Choice is an Illusion
                      • Feb 2005
                      • 42635

                      #11
                      Originally posted by marketsmart
                      here's what i dont get... try to submit a watermarked video to the bigger tube sites and they will shit can it unless you are an advertiser or doing pay per upload..

                      a friend of mine submitted a watermarked video to one larger tube site and they even had the balls to email him and say they rejected his video because it was watermarked and he wasnt an advertiser..

                      so, if they can look for watermarks, then why cant they look for theft...

                      finally, what content owner is going to upload his content to a tubesite with no watermark or any means of monetizing his content?

                      the answer is NONE..

                      so, by default, any video that is uploaded by an end user is almost 100% probability stolen or used without copyright holder permission..

                      i keep wondering if this practice doesnt somehow violate the safe harbor act..
                      Should You Email Your Members?

                      Link1 | Link2 | Link3

                      Enough Said.

                      "Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"

                      Comment

                      • mynameisjim
                        Confirmed User
                        • Aug 2007
                        • 2985

                        #12
                        Originally posted by marketsmart
                        here's what i dont get... try to submit a watermarked video to the bigger tube sites and they will shit can it unless you are an advertiser or doing pay per upload..

                        a friend of mine submitted a watermarked video to one larger tube site and they even had the balls to email him and say they rejected his video because it was watermarked and he wasnt an advertiser..

                        so, if they can look for watermarks, then why cant they look for theft...

                        finally, what content owner is going to upload his content to a tubesite with no watermark or any means of monetizing his content?

                        the answer is NONE..

                        so, by default, any video that is uploaded by an end user is almost 100% probability stolen or used without copyright holder permission..

                        i keep wondering if this practice doesnt somehow violate the safe harbor act..
                        That totally removes their safe harbor protection. It means they are visually inspecting each video upload.
                        jim (at) amateursconvert . com Amateurs Convert

                        Comment

                        • marketsmart
                          HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER
                          • Dec 2004
                          • 20419

                          #13
                          Originally posted by mynameisjim
                          That totally removes their safe harbor protection. It means they are visually inspecting each video upload.
                          thats what i keep thinking...

                          and by notifying advertisers of this wouldnt that make them liable as well..

                          Comment

                          • gideongallery
                            Confirmed User
                            • Aug 2003
                            • 7082

                            #14
                            Originally posted by marketsmart
                            here's what i dont get... try to submit a watermarked video to the bigger tube sites and they will shit can it unless you are an advertiser or doing pay per upload..

                            a friend of mine submitted a watermarked video to one larger tube site and they even had the balls to email him and say they rejected his video because it was watermarked and he wasnt an advertiser..

                            so, if they can look for watermarks, then why cant they look for theft...

                            finally, what content owner is going to upload his content to a tubesite with no watermark or any means of monetizing his content?

                            the answer is NONE..

                            so, by default, any video that is uploaded by an end user is almost 100% probability stolen or used without copyright holder permission..

                            i keep wondering if this practice doesnt somehow violate the safe harbor act..
                            Originally posted by mynameisjim
                            That totally removes their safe harbor protection. It means they are visually inspecting each video upload.
                            you two really need to hire better lawyers because this is probably the stupidest statement ever.

                            the tube site knows the advertiser is supporting the uploads so they can let it go with watermarking.

                            However everything else could be a program, trying to leach traffic without paying or someone who stole the video and replace the watermark with their own (to leach traffic) or (this is the protected one) a "fair use" use of the content.

                            the only one who would not care about having to remove the watermark would be the last one.

                            “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                            Comment

                            • CMBurns
                              Registered User
                              • Aug 2008
                              • 26

                              #15
                              fuck pornbb
                              icq: 468001510

                              Comment

                              • d-null
                                . . .
                                • Apr 2007
                                • 13724

                                #16
                                interesting list and I am glad to say I don't promote any of those

                                __________________

                                Looking for a custom TUBE SCRIPT that supports massive traffic, load balancing, billing support, and h264 encoding? Hit up Konrad!
                                Looking for designs for your websites or custom tubesite design? Hit up Zuzana Designs
                                Check out the #1 WordPress SEO Plugin: CyberSEO Suite

                                Comment

                                • mynameisjim
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Aug 2007
                                  • 2985

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by gideongallery
                                  you two really need to hire better lawyers because this is probably the stupidest statement ever.

                                  the tube site knows the advertiser is supporting the uploads so they can let it go with watermarking.

                                  However everything else could be a program, trying to leach traffic without paying or someone who stole the video and replace the watermark with their own (to leach traffic) or (this is the protected one) a "fair use" use of the content.

                                  the only one who would not care about having to remove the watermark would be the last one.
                                  Gideon, have you spoken to a tube owner about advertising?

                                  It's not a program blocking certian uploads. It's a person.
                                  jim (at) amateursconvert . com Amateurs Convert

                                  Comment

                                  • gideongallery
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Aug 2003
                                    • 7082

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by mynameisjim
                                    Gideon, have you spoken to a tube owner about advertising?

                                    It's not a program blocking certian uploads. It's a person.
                                    and i am telling you that it doesn't matter
                                    do you really think that youtube blocking nudity is done with a program
                                    it done by a person
                                    blocking kiddie porn would fall in the same catagory.
                                    Neither invalidate the safe harbor provision (see the veoh case)
                                    they can set a rule (no watermarks unless you are a sponsor)
                                    and as long as the rule has a bases in protecting fair use (see my example) they are protected by the safe harbor provision.
                                    they don't have to be a promotional vehicle for non paying content providers to be protected by the DMCA
                                    that would violate the very premise of the DMCA safe harbor provision.

                                    “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                                    Comment

                                    • DaddyHalbucks
                                      A freakin' legend!
                                      • Feb 2004
                                      • 18975

                                      #19
                                      Has anyone explored the idea of using RICO against the illegal tube sites?
                                      Boner Money

                                      Comment

                                      • boneprone
                                        Hall Of Fame
                                        • Jan 2001
                                        • 34415

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by DaddyHalbucks
                                        Has anyone explored the idea of using RICO against the illegal tube sites?


                                        Rico?




                                        Rico Suave? How could he help?

                                        Industry Hall Of Fame Legend Mike Jones
                                        Bow to the Power - Still BP4L
                                        http://gfyawards.com/hall-of-fame
                                        Learn about it kids.

                                        Comment

                                        • Klen
                                          • Aug 2006
                                          • 32235

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by marketsmart
                                          you'd be wrong...
                                          Ok 0:1000000000

                                          Comment

                                          Working...