Google experts: How is this guy doing it?

[Shoplifter]

Check out this search:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...TF-8&q=bukkake

Take a look at result #7 japanbukkake.com.

This guy has no relevant text at all in his source...Is he picking up term relevancy solely through links? Or is he cheating.

Last month he was also #4 for the term "japanese girl" without any text of the sort as well.

[SicChild]

Well, I'm no google expert, but he has bukkake in his domain name. I'm sure that helps a lot.

[Pipecrew]

Originally posted by Shoplifter
Check out this search:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...TF-8&q=bukkake

Take a look at result #7 japanbukkake.com.

This guy has no relevant text at all in his source...Is he picking up term relevancy solely through links? Or is he cheating.

Last month he was also #4 for the term "japanese girl" without any text of the sort as well.

Probably cheating, that company use to cheat movie galleries all the time intill they were blacklisted everywhere

[goBigtime]

I know why I know why

And yeah he gets some points for having bukkake in the domain.

[Shoplifter]

Originally posted by SicChild
Well, I'm no google expert, but he has bukkake in his domain name. I'm sure that helps a lot.

If it was japan_bukkake then maybe.

Either he is Google bombing with relevant link terms or cheating.

[detacided]

This months update put ALOT more relavancy on the anchor text meaning the incoming links description. This company having bukkake in its domain probably has alot of links containing the text bukkake. It is really not cheating. Just from now on try to get your keywords in the anchor text as well as on your site.

[FATPad]

Probably just cloaking his page.

[roly]

Originally posted by FATPad
Probably just cloaking his page.

though if he was, wouldn't you be able to see the clocked version in the cached view?

[MattO]

Originally posted by roly


though if he was, wouldn't you be able to see the clocked version in the cached view?

yep plus anyone who's cloaking oughtta put the nocache in their metatags so they aren't cached

[robfantasy]

boku ha kanojo ni mizu wo bukkaketai

[jojojo]

This guy is not cloaking.

He is coming up 7th because:

1. This site has a PR4 with 50 backlinks.
2. He has the word bukkake in his domain
3. He has the word bukkake in his title.

[FATPad]

Originally posted by roly


though if he was, wouldn't you be able to see the clocked version in the cached view?

Yes. ;) I didn't check though.

[RRRED]

I'm a bit behind on my google knowledge but you might want to try putting the url into the alta vista translate page from french to english. That used to work anyway if they had a shitty cloak.

[xxxjay]

the text of you incomeing links is a big deal. if you type:
http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...nt&q=hot+snizz

i have #1 for that, with those word nowhere on the page. it's because is used those words in sopme old recip text that i am not even using anymore, but a lot of people still have those links pointing at me

googlewhacking isn't cheating - it's good manipulation of the google "page reputation" algorythm

[AdultNex]

Originally posted by xxxjay
the text of you incomeing links is a big deal. if you type:
http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...nt&q=hot+snizz

i have #1 for that, with those word nowhere on the page. it's because is used those words in sopme old recip text that i am not even using anymore, but a lot of people still have those links pointing at me

googlewhacking isn't cheating - it's good manipulation of the google "page reputation" algorythm

So that's what Googlewhacking is? Nice tip, btw.

[cool1g]

just wondering...if I have a link on my site to another site that has a high PR and Alexa ranking, but that site does not link back to me, does that help my PR or ranking at all?

I assume not but i wanted some input from those that know the SE/Google game well.

[Ludedude]

Dude, you don't have to know SE's to know that if a site is not linking back to you then you get nothing.

Zero.

Zip.

Zilch.

Nada.

[HS-Trixxxia]

Originally posted by jojojo
This guy is not cloaking.

He is coming up 7th because:

1. This site has a PR4 with 50 backlinks.
2. He has the word bukkake in his domain
3. He has the word bukkake in his title.

--------And--------

He's placed in 7 of 11 search engines.
Alltheweb No
AltaVista Yes www.japanbukkake.com
AOL Yes www.japanbukkake.com
Dmoz No
Google/ AOL Yes www.japanbukkake.com
HotBot/ Inktomi Yes JapanBukkake.com
Lycos Pro No
MSN Yes JapanBukkake.com
Netscape Yes www.japanbukkake.com
Teoma No
WiseNut Yes JapanBukkake.com


And basically of the few words he has on his page, bukkake is repeated 2-3 times. So percentage wise, I believe it's a little over 30.

[pornguy]

I only have one thing to say to that guy!

[ghetto]

This does seem a little suspicous the way he is ranking so well with no meta tags...

interesting because 50 links back is not many at all and to rank in the top 7.....though the competition for that keyword is so small that he should have no problems at all reaching number 1 if he just mentioned "bukkake" a few more times...

[Donnie Gangsta]

Originally posted by robfantasy
boku ha kanojo ni mizu wo bukkaketai

bukkaketai ga kotoba ja nai .. but anyway tabun bukkake shitai to iu koto no hou ga ii kanaa

[jojojo]

This does seem a little suspicous the way he is ranking so well with no meta tags...

Google does not read meta tags.

[xxxjay]

ludedude - outbound link DO count, maybe not as much as inbound, but they do count

jojojo - yes you are exactly right - google does not index meta content (other than the "noindex")

[jojojo]

Jay - hit me up on ICQ bro

[DarkJedi]

hmm.....I dont see 50 linkbacks.
I see only 4.

[funkmaster]

Originally posted by DarkJedi
hmm.....I dont see 50 linkbacks.
I see only 4.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&l...anbukkake.com/

[Dracula]

My dear friends, wtf, the guy has pr4, it is a obviously a bukkake site, he has bukkake in the title and also some relevant text in the page. For me looks more than normal.

Meta tags? Feel free to put tons of metatags, google ignores them 99.5%... put an extremely stupid bogus keyword in your meta tag and you will get some hits for that keyword. This is the case when google uses metatags, when no other page is relevant for a very very specific keyword.

I remeber one site (page) which had 2 months #1 position for a keyword and this keyword was found in the alt tag of the one and only image on that page. But the page had pr5...

In the other had, I have now a page with pr4 which is getting 2 hits a day from google, because is not optimized.
So is very simple, find a natural balance between PR and page optimisation (keywords) and you'll make real money

[ghetto]

<rant>

yeah....OBVIOUSLY google doesn't read meta tags....

like whatever....have you noticed from the latest update that the description meta is being used as your description in google?

now tell me that it doesnt read meta you dumb shitz...

btw, he has 50 backlinks including the pages on his own site...

</rant>

[ghetto]

sorry I didnt mean to "lose my cool"..

forgive me...

[jojojo]

find a natural balance between PR and page optimisation (keywords) and you'll make real money

Actually, it's not about balance at all.

It is about optmizing/maximizing each aspect of how google ranks it's pages. There are 6-7 different things it takes into account. Whoever has the highest overall total comes up first.

[foreverjason]

Well, I'm no google expert, but he has bukkake in his domain name. I'm sure that helps a lot.

This helps alot, I have a few terms I am rated very high on just because my name has it in it.

Also check who is linking him and what text they are using for the link.

Everything Matters

Remember that with google.

[xxxjay]

Originally posted by jojojo
Jay - hit me up on ICQ bro

Hey - are you8 on my icq? i can't fing your icq #

[Scootermuze]

Originally posted by jojojo


Google does not read meta tags.

Ohh but it does..

I'm #4 on Google with one of my sites and the description was pulled from my description meta tag..