Bye Bye software patents! (article)
"The Patent and Trademark Office has now made clear that its newly developed position on patentable subject matter will invalidate many and perhaps most software patents, including pioneering patent claims to such innovators as Google, Inc.
In a series of cases including In re Nuijten, In re Comiskey and In re Bilski, the Patent and Trademark Office has argued in favor of imposing new restrictions on the scope of patentable subject matter set forth by Congress in ยง 101 of the Patent Act. In the most recent of these three?the currently pending en banc Bilski appeal?the Office takes the position that process inventions generally are unpatentable unless they ?result in a physical transformation of an article? or are ?tied to a particular machine.?[1] Perhaps, the agency has conceded, some ?new, unforeseen technology? might warrant an ?exception? to this formalistic test, but in the agency?s view, no such technology has yet emerged so there is no reason currently to use a more inclusive standard.[2]"
READ MORE:
http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008...ath-of-go.html
In a series of cases including In re Nuijten, In re Comiskey and In re Bilski, the Patent and Trademark Office has argued in favor of imposing new restrictions on the scope of patentable subject matter set forth by Congress in ยง 101 of the Patent Act. In the most recent of these three?the currently pending en banc Bilski appeal?the Office takes the position that process inventions generally are unpatentable unless they ?result in a physical transformation of an article? or are ?tied to a particular machine.?[1] Perhaps, the agency has conceded, some ?new, unforeseen technology? might warrant an ?exception? to this formalistic test, but in the agency?s view, no such technology has yet emerged so there is no reason currently to use a more inclusive standard.[2]"
READ MORE:
http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008...ath-of-go.html
Comment