- Photgraph Quality -

[Jey p]

The photographer is a magician or this can be done using a filter ?
If is a filter ? WHere do I get it ? what do you think people ?




http://www.pervertpictures.com/filterorrealphoto.jpg

[Ross]

I got 404 error then redirected!

[benthompson]

me 2

[rooster]

gotta paste the url in. Photo looks like crap to me. Way overexposed, and very fake.

[MattO]

Makeup + good lighting + maybe a little digital retouching

Very much so good lighting

[Ross]

Originally posted by rooster
gotta paste the url in. Photo looks like crap to me. Way overexposed, and very fake.

[Scott McD]

Nice nipples......

[benthompson]

probably the photographer is a beginner as the photo looks so amateurish..

[Jey p]

yup sorry for the error.

You can copy + paste the url into your borwser and see it now.


I want to know if you can create this effect using a filter...

[Mutt]

what effect are you talking about? it's a glamour photo, i don't see what special 'effect' you are talking about. Looks a bit dark and they've turned up the contrast on it.

[Dax]

That is all photoshop work.. the smoothing of the skin .. the rest is mainly playing with contrast...

[pine]

Photoshop -> Filters -> Blur -> Smart Blur

[Scott McD]

I fucked her...

[gothweb]

Most of what you see in that photo is a hell of a lot more about lighting than anything else. Some after-effects, I would guess, but you couldn't make a flatly lit photo look like that with Photoshop.

[Minte]

Thats out of a Playboy NSS shoot..

[Jey p]

"I would guess, but you couldn't make a flatly lit photo look like that with Photoshop"


so , with what?
what do I have to use ?

[Minte]

Down in the lower righthand corner you see that SCP..that is a group of scanners that are some of the very best at editing.They hang on Dalnet...#scp.

[gothweb]

Originally posted by pervert
"you couldn't make a flatly lit photo look like that with Photoshop"


so , with what?
what do I have to use ?

Nothing I know of. A digital photo contains a limited amount of information. You can't force a flat photo to look better, unless you pretty much paint over it by hand, at photo quality.

To get a good photo, you have to take a good photo. You can improve a hell of a lot with photoshop, or other filters, but it has to be based on something.

My guess is, that photo was taken well... Or, to be less evaluative, was taken to look like it does. The lighting, the camera settings, the lens, etc.

[Ludedude]

It's overexposed and the pushing of the contrast in post processing can't hide that.

The blur is no big deal. That can either be done in photpshop or more properly by shooting for a shallow depth of field. In order to keep the skin tone soft and even it's just a matter of how you apply the unsharpen mask.

[KRL]

In the early days a lot of guys would post scans with this interesting style. Its Photoshop adjusted.

[Mutt]

[LiveDose]

I think it's actually her parents we have to thank for that photo