Raid 5 to Raid 0 ...Help?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • leg4
    Confirmed User
    • May 2003
    • 4429

    #1

    Raid 5 to Raid 0 ...Help?

    Bonjour,

    I have a Raid 5 system and I not happy with the overall performance.

    Is there an easy way to convert this system to a Raid 0?
    (I don't care about redundancy)



    Thank you for your time...
    >>> Contact me here

    email me here
  • rowan
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Mar 2002
    • 17393

    #2
    Some details about the controller may help, that's a bit like asking where the rear demister switch is on your "car"

    It may be possible to migrate from a RAID5 to RAID0 array without needing to do a backup and restore, but I'd be backing up your data anyway.

    Comment

    • TidalWave
      Confirmed User
      • Sep 2007
      • 2706

      #3
      No... not without having to re-do your data, so if you're going to do it anyways, why not go to RAID-10... requires 1 more drive (4 minimum) and will give you RAID-0 performance and RAID-1 mirroring.
      www.SwiftNode.com

      Comment

      • rowan
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Mar 2002
        • 17393

        #4
        After thinking about it again I've realised a migration is impossible, because RAID0 will stripe a block of data over several drives. I was thinking more of mirroring, where there's a "spare" drive (out of the RAID5 array) that can be written to first without losing any data.

        Comment

        • latinasscash
          Registered User
          • Jul 2005
          • 95

          #5
          In any conversion scenario, you'll need to make a backup
          copy of your data. So, even tho it is a more expensive
          solution, go with RAID-10 (1+0) as mentioned earlier by
          TidalWave. When data and peformance ar both critical
          it is the only way to go.

          RAID-10 provides better fault tolerance and rebuild performance
          than RAID-01. Both RAIDs provide very good to excellent overall
          performance by combining the speed of RAID 0 with the redundancy
          of RAID 1 without requiring parity calculations.

          Again in ANY scenario, it is a destroy and recreate AFTER
          backing up your data.
          ____________________________________________

          Hot All Latin Content...
          Recurring Partnership Program...
          Content and tours that convert and retain members...

          Comment

          • rowan
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Mar 2002
            • 17393

            #6
            How do you guys pushing RAID10 know he doesn't already have a 4 drive RAID5 system? :P

            One thing that hasn't been mentioned is change in capacity. By moving to RAID0, you'll gain; by moving to RAID10, you'll either stay the same (if you have 3 x RAID5 - but remember you're adding a drive to stay the same) or lose (if you have 4 x RAID5)

            Comment

            • Steve Awesome
              Confirmed User
              • Jan 2007
              • 1575

              #7
              If you want peace of mind *and* speed, go with RAID 1 on 10K Western Digital Raptor drives. If that's too pricey for you, then RAID 1 on SATA is your best bet. I've got 5 pairs of 1 TB Western Digital drives that are RAID 1.

              Comment

              • TidalWave
                Confirmed User
                • Sep 2007
                • 2706

                #8
                RAID-1 does not give you speed, only mirroring
                www.SwiftNode.com

                Comment

                • Steve Awesome
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 1575

                  #9
                  Originally posted by TidalWave
                  RAID-1 does not give you speed, only mirroring
                  That was the "peace of mind" part of the equation that I was talking about, not the speed part. If you want speed, then RAID 0 striped on the Raptors will accomplish that.

                  Comment

                  Working...