How many programs will start dropping NATS !!!

[Gordon G]

Do you think any ?

[BVF]

And risk the wrath of webmasters having to change their links yet again?

[Dirty F]

As always, very little.

Every 6 months or so something big like this happens. Everybody goes nuts. Everybody is pissed and in 2 months from now everybody is happily using Nats as if nothing happened.

[master_design]

Why? what's the problem with NATS?

[Dirty F]

Look at GTS and the shit they pulled a while back. So many people said how they were digusted by Mark and GTS. It was 15 pages of people telling them to fuck off and what an idiots they are. And look now. Nobody cares anymore. Everyone is hitting them up to buy spots etc.

[Karupted Charles]

As always, very little.

Every 6 months or so something big like this happens. Everybody goes nuts. Everybody is pissed and in 2 months from now everybody is happily using Nats as if nothing happened.

Wow for once we agree. People are more afraid of changing links then any security issue. Ofcource there are easy ways to redirect the nats codes to a new system like we did when we dropped them. I believe Greeguy and Jim worked out a redirect also when they dropped them around the same time.

[Dirty F]

Why? what's the problem with NATS?

[ShotGun]

None. Most webmasters can't be bothered by things like this. Most program owners are too lazy to be bothered with switching programs.

[Dirty F]

oops, wrong thread.

[Walrus]

Why? what's the problem with NATS?

Tracking problems. PanchoDog even made a statement about it on here. They now offer webmasters both the option for CCBill and Nats. Before they just had Nats.

[Dirty F]

Wow for once we agree. People are more afraid of changing links then any security issue. Ofcource there are easy ways to redirect the nats codes to a new system like we did when we dropped them. I believe Greeguy and Jim worked out a redirect also when they dropped them around the same time.

And when exactly you dont agree with me?

[Gordon G]

bump for NATS.

[SiMpLe]

Wow for once we agree. People are more afraid of changing links then any security issue. Ofcource there are easy ways to redirect the nats codes to a new system like we did when we dropped them. I believe Greeguy and Jim worked out a redirect also when they dropped them around the same time.

Redirecting works, we've done it for ccbill, epoch and nats. Never once asked any of our affiliates to change links when we've added other programs.

[HouseHead]

fook nats