For those coding CSS Table-less pages [TOOL]

[Azlord]

Get FireBug. Prolly one of the nicest FireFox plugins. Try it out, you won't be sorry.

[beta-tester]

cool one! THanks for sharing man

[jOE :D]

That tool has been a life saver for me in debugging my css

[st0ned]

Wow looks nice, Thanks!

[Scroto]

Nice, I forgot all about it.. just reinstalled!

[Phased]

Is this similar to the web development toolbar also for firefox?
will check it out anyway! thanks

[donborno]

Thanks, been looking for something like that for quite a while

[yahoo-xxx-girls.com]

Notepad for me...

.

[koalat]

Thanks for the link, I'm still in the process of trying to switch over from tables to pure CSS... It's not easy, hopefully FireBug will be the answer!

[woj]

pretty neat, thanks

[Azlord]

for those making sites without tables so the layout looks like its a table :

make the god damn table.

Takes 2 fucken seconds, doesn't just look like a table, it is a table and it renders fine in all browsers

It's not about how fast it can be done. There are a lot of advantages to Table-less pages.

[StuartD]

for those making sites without tables so the layout looks like its a table :

make the god damn table.

Takes 2 fucken seconds, doesn't just look like a table, it is a table and it renders fine in all browsers

Actually, if you know CSS, making a <div> </div> can be a whole lot faster than making a <table><tr><td></td></tr></table.

[Altheon]

I love css but the damn cross browser compatibility is such a bitch.

[alby_persignup]

looks awesome! thanks

[nation-x]

be aware that it has a giant memory leak and will eat up your memory if you browse with it enabled

[Azlord]

I love css but the damn cross browser compatibility is such a bitch.

Yah it's a bitch forsure. Get it looking good in FF, then check IE 6 Always something different. I'm getting better, but still... takes time. I think it's worth it in the end. If you know what you're doing making CSS pages will always help your SEO.

[Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE]

for those making sites without tables so the layout looks like its a table :

make the god damn table.

Takes 2 fucken seconds, doesn't just look like a table, it is a table and it renders fine in all browsers

are you serious?

tables, you have a navigation on the left, content, then more navigation, when spidered, the bot sees the navigation first, and then lists that in your search results, but if you use css/divs then you can make the content show in the source first, then navigation, but actualyl viewing the page, it looks like tables, thus getting your CONTENT indexed, not your navigation

[2012]

for those making sites without tables so the layout looks like its a table :

make the god damn table.

Takes 2 fucken seconds, doesn't just look like a table, it is a table and it renders fine in all browsers

... tables are so easy even a caveman can do it !
I get in that same habit ...

[Azlord]

are you serious?

tables, you have a navigation on the left, content, then more navigation, when spidered, the bot sees the navigation first, and then lists that in your search results, but if you use css/divs then you can make the content show in the source first, then navigation, but actualyl viewing the page, it looks like tables, thus getting your CONTENT indexed, not your navigation

You're telling people TOO much hehe.

[StuartD]

be aware that it has a giant memory leak and will eat up your memory if you browse with it enabled

CSS?? Uhmm... ok, where did you get that bit of misinformation from?

[Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE]

CSS?? Uhmm... ok, where did you get that bit of misinformation from?

nah, he means the FF plugin