COMUS question

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SmokeyTheBear
    ►SouthOfHeaven
    • Jun 2004
    • 28609

    #1

    COMUS question

    New to comus here and hoping some current members can help me out with a few questions..

    I notice on the comus list of sites a few stand out with extremely high %
    http://xxxonfire.com/comussites.html

    site = 1119 revshareasians.com 31300%
    site # 505 nastythumbs.com 42357%

    How is the quality index ranked.. They appear to just be aff landing pages ?
    hatisblack at yahoo.com
  • Bake
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2001
    • 5914

    #2
    Im not sure if I understand the question there are a few tricks you can preform with comus to get the prod higher that not everyone knows. I belive the % is measured by how much the sufer clicks. This is why the prod goes down as the skim goes up.
    Buy great domains from drunken burned out old webmaster CHEAP bullseyeporn.com art-met.com and more.
    Learn how to make a easy extra $500 per week

    Comment

    • SmokeyTheBear
      ►SouthOfHeaven
      • Jun 2004
      • 28609

      #3
      Originally posted by Bake
      Im not sure if I understand the question there are a few tricks you can preform with comus to get the prod higher that not everyone knows. I belive the % is measured by how much the sufer clicks. This is why the prod goes down as the skim goes up.
      I dont see any links on those pages that would correspond with those numbers, they appear to be landing pages, just curious how they use the ranking system .. if they are getting 1 hit in how are they getting 400 out ? the tgp's dont seem any different than other tgp's

      ie how could 1 person click out 400 times if there isnt even 400 links..
      hatisblack at yahoo.com

      Comment

      • Bake
        Confirmed User
        • Jan 2001
        • 5914

        #4
        They have there own message board but dont expect an answer from them quickly. There new tech guy dose seem better than before thou.
        Buy great domains from drunken burned out old webmaster CHEAP bullseyeporn.com art-met.com and more.
        Learn how to make a easy extra $500 per week

        Comment

        • SmokeyTheBear
          ►SouthOfHeaven
          • Jun 2004
          • 28609

          #5
          bump 2 see if the day crew has any ideas
          hatisblack at yahoo.com

          Comment

          • Juicy D. Links
            So Fucking Banned
            • Apr 2001
            • 122992

            #6
            Smokey its the overall prod of the site.... ie: ... if surfer enters... he clicks like 10 thumbs.. thats good... now if a site sends you 1000 hits and those 1000 only click like 100 times that is crap and the prod of your site will go down...

            its hard to explain but let me go rub one out ill be back in 5

            Comment

            • Vendzilla
              Biker Gnome
              • Mar 2004
              • 23200

              #7
              number of clicks/number of surfers=Productivity
              1000 clicks with 100 surfers = 1000% productivity
              300 clicks with 100 surfers = 300% productivity
              That list needs to be updated, Tony has been really busy with some new tools for comus and hasn't got around to that page in a while, I use it as a tool looking for trades, the higher it is on the page, the higher the traffic is for that site
              Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
              think about that

              Comment

              • revolte
                Confirmed User
                • Jun 2006
                • 210

                #8
                31300% that would mean that the averange surfer clicks 313 times

                Comment

                • Slick
                  Confirmed User
                  • Feb 2001
                  • 7338

                  #9
                  woops, wrong thread post, he he he.

                  Comment

                  Working...