thinking of upgrading apache

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • elron
    Confirmed User
    • Jul 2003
    • 1553

    #1

    thinking of upgrading apache

    ever since i manage servers i used apache 1.3 . but at my newest server i've decided to learn and install apache 2.0 and it looks like it can take more traffic then the 1.3 at the same server hardware . loads averages are much shorter for higher processes handled real time .

    anyone experienced the same ?
  • HorseShit
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Dec 2004
    • 17513

    #2
    I honestly don't see the point to it unless you need it for a specific reason

    Comment

    • elron
      Confirmed User
      • Jul 2003
      • 1553

      #3
      well i said the reason , it looks like it can handle more traffic then the 1.3

      Can anyone confirm that ?

      Comment

      • fris
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Aug 2002
        • 55679

        #4
        not sure always been a fan of 1.x but i just upgraded to php5
        Since 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence.

        Comment

        • elron
          Confirmed User
          • Jul 2003
          • 1553

          #5
          i also use php5 , that didn't effect perfomance .

          Comment

          • SplitInfinity
            Confirmed User
            • Dec 2002
            • 3047

            #6
            Apache 2.0 is MUCH better. :-)

            Take it from 11+ years of experience with Apache. :-)

            Comment

            • Tempest
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • May 2004
              • 10217

              #7
              I haven't quite figured out my problems yet but it seems like apache 2 does some things differently... i.e. On my 1.3 servers I have cgi-bin stuff set up to not be hotlinked.. But it doesn't work on the 2.0 server.. It appears that on 1.3, any additional requests for page items are done with the referer being the page itself as opposed to the surfer.. In 2.0 it seems that the referer it the surfer.. So in 2.0, the hotlinking prevents my scripts from running.. a pain for traffic trading scripts.

              Comment

              • k0nr4d
                Confirmed User
                • Aug 2006
                • 9231

                #8
                I think apache 1.3 is waaay better. More third party module support and its been around for much longer
                Mechanical Bunny Media
                Mechbunny Tube Script | Mechbunny Webcam Aggregator Script | Custom Web Development

                Comment

                • elron
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jul 2003
                  • 1553

                  #9
                  Originally posted by SplitInfinity
                  Apache 2.0 is MUCH better. :-)

                  Take it from 11+ years of experience with Apache. :-)
                  better by what ?

                  Comment

                  • ne0
                    Confirmed User
                    • May 2006
                    • 781

                    #10
                    Originally posted by elron
                    better by what ?
                    In a simple way: it's faster, and can handle way much more traffic with less cpu usage.
                    You can read the list of improvements/bugfixes at: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/new_features_2_0.html

                    In my personal opinion, it's damn better
                    hai2u

                    Comment

                    • elron
                      Confirmed User
                      • Jul 2003
                      • 1553

                      #11
                      too bad i'll have to work my ass off for all the bugs it will do to my htaccess files and script

                      Comment

                      • HunkyLuke
                        Virgin by request ;)
                        • Feb 2002
                        • 1924

                        #12
                        apache 2 is better, but the real difference is in the kernel version you are using.

                        cheers,
                        Luke

                        Comment

                        • QTbucks_Mark
                          Confirmed User
                          • Mar 2006
                          • 254

                          #13
                          When configured correctly, Apache 2.0 kicks 1.3's ass.

                          Especially under high load, switching from traditional prefork to the new worker-model makes a huge difference. If it's just for static content, I would say you can throw as much traffic at it as you want - you'll probably run out of bandwidth before your server breaks a sweat.

                          In fact, when my galleries get listed at thehun or other high-traffic sites, I can hardly see any increase of load on my servers. Other than bandwidth used that is...


                          QTbucks : featuring cherrywinters.com - sweetcarry.com - cutecaroline.com
                          [email protected] :: ICQ 26505638

                          Comment

                          • Marshal
                            Biz Dev and SEO
                            • Jun 2005
                            • 15219

                            #14
                            Apache 2.0 kicks-ass!
                            ---
                            Busy ranking websites on Google...

                            Comment

                            Working...