CCBill primary question

[Brujah]

Affiliate programs that use CCBill primarily, but have paycom as a secondary processor.. if the only stats the affiliate gets is his CCBill login.. is the affiliate program ripping off it's affiliates by not sharing the paycom?

[crazies]

That would depend if they use a program such as NATs then you would not need the login for Paycom. From my experience if they solely rely on CCBill stats and Paycom as a 2nd option then you normally sign up for the Paycom account yourself unless it is Paycom EU which do not pay the affiliates directly.

[Brujah]

Right, the affiliate program I'm talking about would not have their own stats. The only stats as an affiliate that you get, are from the usual CCBill admin. If they are processing with Paycom as a secondary then, would it be safe to assume that no affiliates are getting paid for the secondary processor signups in this example?

[crazies]

Possible but I would hate to say for sure as there are some honest companies out there that would still pay but how would they track it.... unless of coarse they didn't mention that they had the secondaty option and you had to find out on your own.

We prefer to have everything up front so the affiliates see and know about everything.

[rowan]

Click through via your ccbill link and see if Paycom shows as an option on the join page. Some programs only have the secondary option for typeins and other non affiliate traffic.

If it IS shown then technically it's a traffic leak... even more so since someone clicking on the Paycom link probably does want to join.

[DutchTeenCash]

if they use a ticket system like nubiles youll get credited and receive a sep check, if theres a clean ccbill link like refer.ccbill.comblablabla then youre sending traffic thats never gonna be credited to you no

[rowan]

Bump1234

[SomeCreep]

Right, the affiliate program I'm talking about would not have their own stats. The only stats as an affiliate that you get, are from the usual CCBill admin. If they are processing with Paycom as a secondary then, would it be safe to assume that no affiliates are getting paid for the secondary processor signups in this example?

The only sponsor I know like that is ATKCash.

http://refer.ccbill.com/cgi-bin/clic.../01/?id=100000

I'm not sure how this link works, but I've emailed ATKcash on more than one occasion and asked them if webmasters are credited for paycom sales as well, even though the link is for CCBill. They've always said yes, that webmasters are credited for both CCBill and Paycom sales using that link.

What sponsor are you referring too?