Softcore Glamour Content?

[Mutt]

What do you guys think the market is for softcore(meaning Playboy/FHM/Maxim) licensed content is? I mean really high quality, like Mac and Bumble, like M & B no spread pussy shots.

Would anybody here buy sets like those?

[Cyber3]

If they are very high quality, yes I would buy them.

Regards,

Kevin

[Mutt]

hmmmm......... only one person.

that stuff is expensive to shoot, really expensive, might not be such a great niche to target for me but this is hardly a scientific survey.

nice site you have there Cyber3. lots of Matrix and Jokersx sets, good stuff

we shoot some of the same models, weird how some look better with the glamour treatment and some look worse. Catalina definitely looks hotter all made up.

[whitey]

Would definitely pony up for that type of content...it sells.

[eru]

Dat kinda' content be great.

[CC]

I'd definitely buy content like that as well!

Cassie

[Honeyslut]

I love Suze Randall's stuff.

[DennisK]

Hi,

We sell that kind of content for a long time now. I sell a lot of sets to Penthouse, Looker, Perfection and in the past to Playboy magazine.
If somebody is interested in these kind of material just hit me up on icq and I will show you a lot of high class stuff shot by Italian Photographers.

Cya,
Dennis (icq: 108483386)

[Nydahl]

I recieve some custom requests for this stuff - I can say that I like this style above all - it is more sexy to me then raw pink or so...My girlfriend is Playmate March and I liked it

[gothweb]

Buy it? Nah, I don't buy content. ;) Selling it, on the other hand... I sell that kind of content just fine.

[gothweb]

;) Sometimes like this...

[Loch]

Mutt we have some of that in our database where you dont even see the pussy AT ALL!
Dont know about extreme quality, but it sells well for us

[Mutt]

i'm not a big fan of Suze Randall, it's way too 'theatrical' looking, kinda gaudy plastic looking even though she has shot practically every beautiful adult model in the history of modern porn.

I like edgier looking photography that doesn't take too great a leap into being purely art and loses its 'wank factor'. Sets shot in interesting locations, creative shots which feature face and different body parts, outdoors is always good.

I don't know how most people feel, but in still photography, i have no interest in guy/girl or girl/girl hardcore photos, to me that is for videos these days. Even when I was 14 years old and buying/borrowing men's mags I never really looked at the boy/girl pictorials, just the girl solo.

For photos I couldn't care if there is one spread pink shot, it's just so 'forced' and un-natural, open leg is erotic though.

As much as I praise ALSSCANS for his success and the quality of the work and models, it really doesn't do much for me. I'd rather see a beautiful photo of a gorgeous model's perfect ass lying on some white sand tropical beach.

[Paul Markham]

Yes it sells. But to shoot it only for the net is not profitable and few net shooters have the skills.

This is what it should look like, and for those that wondered what our top selling sets are here is the top selling set.

Top seller

Another good seller

But all of the "6000" series sell very well.

It seems that though it is not a big niche on the net it's not well supplied which makes it a winner.

[Mutt]

two great sets Paul. both girls are gorgeous.

Veronika Zemenova is beyond gorgeous, almost perfection i think. I think i told you what her quote is here in North America for a shoot - $2,000 - softcore glamour.

[Mutt]

i know it isn't profitable to shoot sets like that only for the Net, it's got to be shot by people who have primary and secondary markets they can sell it to to turn a profit.

Did you shoot Veronika yourself or is that some other shooter's set you bought or represent?

[Paul Markham]

Originally posted by Mutt
i know it isn't profitable to shoot sets like that only for the Net, it's got to be shot by people who have primary and secondary markets they can sell it to to turn a profit.

Did you shoot Veronika yourself or is that some other shooter's set you bought or represent?

To make it pay we have to sell a set at least three times including the Internet. The Internet is the most forgiving market.

The "6000" series sets were shot by someone else I'm sad to say.

[Cyber3]

nice site you have there Cyber3. lots of Matrix and Jokersx sets, good stuff

Thanks I do buy allot of it, I take every set Matrix and Joker can produce, I spend 7 to 8 thousand dollars a month on content, but if you had it also I would take it, can never have enough


Regards,

Kevin

[gothweb]

For the record, I am shooting only for the web, and doing okay. Sure, I'm not fantastically successful, but I only flog my stuff part-time. I am sure there is more serious money with the magazines, but the internet isn't so bad.

[PaulSweet]

We're launching 13,000 pics of that sort of content here in the next month on SweetErotica.com