question about link dumps

[blazi]

just started my 1st link dump @ http://www.sweatysexdump.com/

for those of you who have experience with running link dumps, do you suggest that the link be verified by admin 1st or just have it go live right after submitting? I guess what I'm really trying to ask is, what's better for traffic/retention for both webmasters and surfers, or does it really matter?

[L-Pink]

I don't like the words "sweaty" and "dump" in the same sentence .....

[blazi]

I don't like the words "sweaty" and "dump" in the same sentence .....

what's in a name hehe

[Bro Media - BANNED FOR LIFE]

just started my 1st link dump @ http://www.sweatysexdump.com/

for those of you who have experience with running link dumps, do you suggest that the link be verified by admin 1st or just have it go live right after submitting? I guess what I'm really trying to ask is, what's better for traffic/retention for both webmasters and surfers, or does it really matter?

your first mistake is using plug a thug... thats so widely used, you will get hit with HUGE spam in a day or 2....

second, use a original name... sites with "dump" don't really do to welll...

and third, make it open to anyone, till traffic and submissions start coming in decntly, then close it up for approval

[CIVMatt]

doing a verify on a linkdump is a waste of fucking time

[blazi]

cool, thanks for the advice guys!

[spacedog]

Nice Looking Dump

[blazi]

Nice Looking Dump

thanks

[KrisKross]

are link dumps really worth running?

i suppose even if they generate a couple of bucks a month, they're worth the trouble.

[blazi]

are link dumps really worth running?

i suppose even if they generate a couple of bucks a month, they're worth the trouble.

I got my 1st sale within the 1st 24 hours of the site being live and I have barely added any link trades yet if that tells ya anything...