Apache 2.0.43 worth installing?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ServerGenius
    Confirmed User
    • Feb 2002
    • 9377

    #1

    Apache 2.0.43 worth installing?

    And I don´t want opinions of people who haven´t used it...but
    just heard that it sucks.......Thank You



    DynaMite
    | http://www.sinnerscash.com/ | ICQ: 370820 | Skype: SinnersCash | AdultWhosWho |
  • funkmaster
    So Fucking Banned
    • Sep 2001
    • 7938

    #2
    ... I heared it sucks !

    Comment

    • ServerGenius
      Confirmed User
      • Feb 2002
      • 9377

      #3
      Originally posted by funkmaster
      ... I heared it sucks !
      Then it must be true

      DynaMite
      | http://www.sinnerscash.com/ | ICQ: 370820 | Skype: SinnersCash | AdultWhosWho |

      Comment

      • funkmaster
        So Fucking Banned
        • Sep 2001
        • 7938

        #4
        ... hahahaha !!

        ... to be honest with you I have not upgraded yet, because I am a lazzy bastard and there are only some minor bug fixes ... nevertheless I will do it this weekend, if you want me to I will let you know ...

        Comment

        • ServerGenius
          Confirmed User
          • Feb 2002
          • 9377

          #5
          Originally posted by funkmaster
          ... hahahaha !!

          ... to be honest with you I have not upgraded yet, because I am a lazzy bastard and there are only some minor bug fixes ... nevertheless I will do it this weekend, if you want me to I will let you know ...
          Apache 1.3 or 2.0 is a BIG difference....2.0 is a complete rewrite
          from scratch based on a completely different structure.

          http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/new_features_2_0.html

          It´s now multithreaded and also the API for the modules is
          completely new.....this is not just an upgrade...it´s a complete
          different webserver.

          DynaMite
          | http://www.sinnerscash.com/ | ICQ: 370820 | Skype: SinnersCash | AdultWhosWho |

          Comment

          • SpaceAce
            Confirmed User
            • Jul 2002
            • 6493

            #6
            This probably isn't what you meant, but I have it on my personal machine. I use it for script development and testing purposes. I have about half a dozen virtual hosts setup on it. So far, it's been 100% stable and I like it. With the 1.x series I would experience a lot of minor irritations with setup and performance but 2.0.43 doesn't give me any hassles.

            SpaceAce

            Comment

            • MadCat the 2nd
              Registered User
              • Nov 2002
              • 4

              #7
              Apache 2.x is basically an entirely different beast, so only upgrade if you can get your custom modules also for 2.x - for example, if you use mod_perl at all, you really -dont- want to go to 2.x since a lot of custom modules will plain out refuse to work, or cause some major crashage because they're not thread safe.

              Comment

              • ServerGenius
                Confirmed User
                • Feb 2002
                • 9377

                #8
                I know the modules issues....all I basically need is mod_rewrite,
                mod_auth_mysql and php. I don´t use dynamic loaded modules.
                I prefer to compile everything static in the httpd binary...all
                modules I need are working under 2.0 so I don´t have any issues
                with that......I guess I´m going to give it a shot.....will let you guys
                know what happens

                DynaMite
                | http://www.sinnerscash.com/ | ICQ: 370820 | Skype: SinnersCash | AdultWhosWho |

                Comment

                Working...