Shooting Content

[Direktor]

I have a few girls that are up for it, we've got all the equipment needed to start shooting.

Can anybody point me in the right direction as far as licensing, paperwork and all that shit goes...


I have no clue on how to do this, I know is not just about taking the pictures and publish them online...



any advice will be appreciated.

[beemk]

you need to talk to a lawyer who is familiar with this stuff.

[AaronM]

Originally posted by beemk
you need to talk to a lawyer who is familiar with this stuff.

Agreed.

[Direktor]

What if I just take the pics, have the girls sign some kind of agreement ..... and thats it?



I guess I need the lawyer to type this "AGREEMENT",



HMM

[Braincash Fred]

If you don't want to end in trouble or loosing your money seee a lawyer before shooting...

Here is a site with some informations that should help you
http://www.xxxlaw.net

[AaronM]

Originally posted by AC fred
If you don't want to end in trouble or loosing your money seee a lawyer before shooting...

Here is a site with some informations that should help you
http://www.xxxlaw.net

Another Great suggestion. Tell J.D. I said hello.

[beemk]

you definitely need to see a lawyer because for instance if you lived in a bible belt state or something that didnt allow porn you could be facing legal charges. thats just one of the many examples that could go wrong.

[Direktor]

Thanks for all the info guys, I hope to be publishing our content soon. I'll post some here

[Cal]

For the frugal entrepreneur:

www.coollawyer.com

She has pre-made contracts that will suit your needs, xxxlaw was quite pricey ($500 deposit required on any job) I believe this is what you need:

http://coollawyer.com/webfront/docli...500+1034465645

Or if you need a good lawyer purely for consultation try Richard Chapo - [email protected]

Tell him Cal referred you and he'll go easy on you.

C.

[Paul Markham]

Try this guy, he has worked in this field for a long time and knows the business. But it will depend on where you set up business in the States, you will fins San Fran has different rules to say Memphis. But David will put you right.

David Loundy [email protected]

There are some standard models releases around, email me and I will send you one, but be quick I'm off on holiday today. But there is a lot of mis information around YOU HAVE TO TALK TO A LAWYER

[RottenPug]

I have been doing business with RIchard Chapo for 5 years. He is a stand up guy and knows the ins and outs of the business. Give him a call he won't charge you for it


http://www.adultinternetlaw.com


Stay Rotten

[Carrie]

Here's a model release:
http://www.netpond.com/tools/models_release.html

And here's a series of articles about creating your own content:
http://www.netpond.com/articles.php?cat=27

[UnseenWorld]

Originally posted by Carrie
Here's a model release:
http://www.netpond.com/tools/models_release.html

And here's a series of articles about creating your own content:
http://www.netpond.com/articles.php?cat=27

Hmm, I would run this particular release past an attorney. It has a line reading "I hereby state that if I choose to engage in an sexual act while performing as a paid model, it will be for my personal enjoyment" which (apart from the typo) is a baldfaced lie on the face of it (the model is posing for money), and in some jurisdictions to accept money to perform a sexual act for the enjoyment of someone present is a sufficient definition of prostitution. It is the fact that the sex is NOT being performed for the enjoyment of anyone present that allows for the veil of First Amendment protection.

[nocostporn]

Hey bitch,is it ok if I plaster your naked ass all over the net for $300?

----------------------
sign here

[UnseenWorld]

I think you might be better off to let someone else do the shooting for you. For one thing, unless you know you have some kind of creative aptitude, just having a camera and a couple naked girls is not enough to make quality content.

[Paul Markham]

Originally posted by UnseenWorld


Hmm, I would run this particular release past an attorney. It has a line reading "I hereby state that if I choose to engage in an sexual act while performing as a paid model, it will be for my personal enjoyment" which (apart from the typo) is a baldfaced lie on the face of it (the model is posing for money), and in some jurisdictions to accept money to perform a sexual act for the enjoyment of someone present is a sufficient definition of prostitution. It is the fact that the sex is NOT being performed for the enjoyment of anyone present that allows for the veil of First Amendment protection.

Reread it, it's trying to state that the model is doing it for the fun of it and not the money.

A good way around this, check it with a lawyer, is to pay the model for the rights to sell the pictures. Not for the modelling she was doing, that was free, the rights to own/resell the pictures is what she was paid for.

Unseen
I do agree with your next statement but as you have said many times there are many different styles and requirements on the net. This guy might just be a natural as the guy at Cute Teens YDG, if my memory serves me right.

There is more to read from that other "Natural" PM or something.

http://www.contentspotlight.com/centerstage.html

[UnseenWorld]

Originally posted by charly
Reread it, it's trying to state that the model is doing it for the fun of it and not the money. [/url]

And like I said, to accept money (which she would have to do to make the release truly and universally effective in the US) for the enjoyment of someone present is a definition of prostitution. I'm not sure what your point is. Also, like I said, it's a lie on the face of it, which might invalidate the release in itself.