Vette vs. Jet

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HQ
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2001
    • 3539

    #1

    Vette vs. Jet

    http://www.motortrend.com/june02/vette/1.html

    ...a best quarter-mile run of 9.24 sec at 150.27 mph. Perhaps more impressive, the 0-60 mph run -- the Holy Grail of acceleration measurements -- took less than 2.0 sec. No lie, no typo.
  • gothweb
    Confirmed User
    • Jun 2002
    • 8849

    #2
    I liked the test MacLaren did for the F1 better... 0-100-0... I think it was under 6 seconds. Shazbat, that is fast!

    Photos by Ian X.: Distinctive photos of goth babes.
    Blood Money:Your traffic, my sites, our money.
    MojoHost: Still the best.

    Comment

    • HQ
      Confirmed User
      • Jan 2001
      • 3539

      #3
      McLaren F1's do 0-60 in 3.4 seconds. That is way slower than this Lingenfelter Vette.

      Comment

      • gothweb
        Confirmed User
        • Jun 2002
        • 8849

        #4
        Oh, agreed. I just liked the test. Must take nerves of steel.

        Photos by Ian X.: Distinctive photos of goth babes.
        Blood Money:Your traffic, my sites, our money.
        MojoHost: Still the best.

        Comment

        • HQ
          Confirmed User
          • Jan 2001
          • 3539

          #5
          Yeah, that is a cool test.

          Comment

          • Juge
            Confirmed User
            • Feb 2001
            • 1917

            #6
            Fucking sweeeeeeeet. I want one.

            Comment

            • Juge
              Confirmed User
              • Feb 2001
              • 1917

              #7
              This was done just this year:

              Dodge Viper vs. Air Force F-16
              http://www.motortrend.com/news/stories/020329dv.html
              The viper won the 1/4 mile, and lost the 1/2 mile by just a little bit.

              Comment

              • HQ
                Confirmed User
                • Jan 2001
                • 3539

                #8
                Yeah I saw that. The new viper kicks ass too.

                Comment

                • On-top
                  Confirmed User
                  • Aug 2001
                  • 2283

                  #9
                  Damn. That's a quick car.


                  You can get those packages, upto 725 HP, on his website. It's only $50 grand on top of the Corvette price.


                  http://www.lingenfelter.com/pac725ttls1y.asp
                  Dynamic Hosting

                  Comment

                  • MrBrian
                    Confirmed User
                    • Mar 2001
                    • 1215

                    #10
                    >I liked the test MacLaren did for the F1 better... 0-100-0

                    not six seconds but around 11.4. i remember this because thats the time my rx7 ran in the 1/4 mile no nitrous either hehe
                    ICQ #971-2561

                    Comment

                    • HQ
                      Confirmed User
                      • Jan 2001
                      • 3539

                      #11
                      Originally posted by MrBrian
                      >I liked the test MacLaren did for the F1 better... 0-100-0

                      not six seconds but around 11.4. i remember this because thats the time my rx7 ran in the 1/4 mile no nitrous either hehe
                      Wow, you had an RX7 doing 11.4 in the 1/4 mile???

                      Comment

                      • Juge
                        Confirmed User
                        • Feb 2001
                        • 1917

                        #12
                        Originally posted by On-top
                        Damn. That's a quick car.


                        You can get those packages, upto 725 HP, on his website. It's only $50 grand on top of the Corvette price.


                        http://www.lingenfelter.com/pac725ttls1y.asp
                        Yup. Vettes are the best bang for the buck, and the lingenfelter package on top of it is again the best bang for the buck.

                        Comment

                        • Lane
                          Will code for food...
                          • Apr 2001
                          • 8496

                          #13
                          regular viper is better than regular vette

                          Comment

                          • Juge
                            Confirmed User
                            • Feb 2001
                            • 1917

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Lane
                            regular viper is better than regular vette
                            Indeed it is. It also costs $70k instead of $40k. But, I like the Viper, better, anyway.

                            Comment

                            Working...