Content Producers

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Barefootsies
    Choice is an Illusion
    • Feb 2005
    • 42635

    #1

    Content Producers

    Anyone have a good still camera recommendation?

    Thanks in advance.

    Should You Email Your Members?

    Link1 | Link2 | Link3

    Enough Said.

    "Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"
  • SinisterStudios
    Confirmed User
    • Nov 2003
    • 3087

    #2
    Canon 20d, there really is no need to look any further
    SEOIP.com
    Multiple IP Webhosting
    Shared and Dedicated IP's - Multiple Class A's - From $1.99/ip

    Comment

    • Barefootsies
      Choice is an Illusion
      • Feb 2005
      • 42635

      #3
      TY for the recommendation.

      I'll put the chaps to research it some more.

      Should You Email Your Members?

      Link1 | Link2 | Link3

      Enough Said.

      "Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"

      Comment

      • Nydahl
        Confirmed User
        • Sep 2002
        • 6655

        #4
        Originally posted by SinisterStudios
        Canon 20d, there really is no need to look any further
        you should better stick with some pro stuff.D1 markII is a good camera and produce far better results then D20 - I had both.
        www.garciniatrio.com
        www.acaitrio.com
        www.greencoffeetrio.com

        ICQ 153918034 email [email protected]

        Comment

        • my2257
          Confirmed User
          • May 2005
          • 110

          #5
          We use the Canon 1Ds Mach II (16.7 megapixel) in house.

          The Canon 1D Mach II (8.2 effective megapixel resolution) is a GREAT camera for the dollar. It is a true PRO camera and built to take a beating.

          Canon 20D is priced right, but we killed both of ours in under a year with about 200,000 images on each body. If your not planning on shooting 100,000 plus images on the camera the 20D is the best buy for the dollar

          Comment

          • SinisterStudios
            Confirmed User
            • Nov 2003
            • 3087

            #6
            Originally posted by Nydahl
            you should better stick with some pro stuff.D1 markII is a good camera and produce far better results then D20 - I had both.
            We have both too and unless your doing High End Magazine shoots or you have the need to do ultra large blowups there is no need to spend all the money on the 1ds, the 20d will do a pefect job. Spend the extra money on the proper "L" lenses for the 20d and shoot away. Then when you want to move up to the 1ds you will have all the lenses already. We have over $15k invested in lenses plus another 7k for the 1ds body, and since the 1ds shoots 90 meg raw images you will need alot of storage for them, so it can get expensive. But its nice to have multiple cameras that the expensive lenses fit.
            SEOIP.com
            Multiple IP Webhosting
            Shared and Dedicated IP's - Multiple Class A's - From $1.99/ip

            Comment

            • MaDalton
              I am Amazing Content!
              • Feb 2004
              • 39861

              #7
              Originally posted by my2257
              We use the Canon 1Ds Mach II (16.7 megapixel) in house.

              The Canon 1D Mach II (8.2 effective megapixel resolution) is a GREAT camera for the dollar. It is a true PRO camera and built to take a beating.

              Canon 20D is priced right, but we killed both of ours in under a year with about 200,000 images on each body. If your not planning on shooting 100,000 plus images on the camera the 20D is the best buy for the dollar

              our 20D died after 120.000 pics - but i would still recommend it. we got it fixed for free by Canon and sold it as "nearly new" on ebay
              AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
              Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
              Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
              Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

              Comment

              • NaughtyRob
                Two fresh affiliate progs
                • Nov 2004
                • 29602

                #8
                Originally posted by SinisterStudios
                Canon 20d, there really is no need to look any further
                And if you want to go a little more affordable Canon Rebel XT
                [email protected]
                Skype: 17026955414
                Vacares Web Hosting - Protect Your Ass with Included Daily Backups

                Comment

                • nojob
                  The Original NoJob
                  • Feb 2004
                  • 3682

                  #9
                  Originally posted by SinisterStudios
                  We have both too and unless your doing High End Magazine shoots or you have the need to do ultra large blowups there is no need to spend all the money on the 1ds, the 20d will do a pefect job. Spend the extra money on the proper "L" lenses for the 20d and shoot away. Then when you want to move up to the 1ds you will have all the lenses already. We have over $15k invested in lenses plus another 7k for the 1ds body, and since the 1ds shoots 90 meg raw images you will need alot of storage for them, so it can get expensive. But its nice to have multiple cameras that the expensive lenses fit.
                  He has the right idea. They are OG's in the business.

                  Comment

                  Working...