Ibill Admin

[Sleepy]

Is there anyone else pulling their hair out with this new Ibill admin ?
I cant believe how god damn slow it is . The sessions time out before the page even loads. That stupid ass menu makes it impossible to print anything .

Oh, and theres "no need to drop the web900 links" .. but they cant pay your for the sales. Thats just great.

Im sorry.. its just so friggin frustrating !

[Gator]

It hasn't been slow for me at all lately.

[jennycards]

Originally posted by Sleepy
Is there anyone else pulling their hair out with this new Ibill admin ?
I cant believe how god damn slow it is . The sessions time out before the page even loads.

Same here :-((

[TheApostate]

it's slower, but not that damn slow, try upgrading your 14.4 kbps modem

[wouncie]

Thats was a concern .... Until Ibill just pulled the "We're keeping all your web 900 sales from June 1 - July 21 shit)



I can't believe that bullshit! I'm suprised more people aren't as pissed as I am.
DAMMIT MAN!!

[Gator]

Originally posted by wouncie
Thats was a concern .... Until Ibill just pulled the "We're keeping all your web 900 sales from June 1 - July 21 shit)



I can't believe that bullshit! I'm suprised more people aren't as pissed as I am.
DAMMIT MAN!!

I'm pissed, but it's not iBill's fault.

[gothweb]

Originally posted by Gator


I'm pissed, but it's not iBill's fault.

Sure it is. Yes, Worldcom tanked. So they can't pay iBill. However, while it would be expensive, iBill did have the *option* choose to to eat the loss themselves. They decided not to pay Webmasters for those sales. Sure they didn't get the money, but a webmaster's contract isn't with WorldCom.

After all, it is their responsibility to pay webmasters for *sales*, not for what iBill actually get's paid. Unless they get chapter-11 status too, they are still responsible for their own debts. Only WorldCom gets off the hook from their Ch11 status.

For all I know this sort of thing is in iBill's contracts already. So I am sure what they did was legal... However, they did not *have* to do it they way they did. It isn't like 900 is a huge portion of sales. Can we say "one-time expenditure" and "tax write-off"?

[wouncie]

Originally posted by gothweb


Sure it is. Yes, Worldcom tanked. So they can't pay iBill. However, while it would be expensive, iBill did have the *option* choose to to eat the loss themselves. They decided not to pay Webmasters for those sales. Sure they didn't get the money, but a webmaster's contract isn't with WorldCom.

After all, it is their responsibility to pay webmasters for *sales*, not for what iBill actually get's paid. Unless they get chapter-11 status too, they are still responsible for their own debts. Only WorldCom gets off the hook from their Ch11 status.

For all I know this sort of thing is in iBill's contracts already. So I am sure what they did was legal... However, they did not *have* to do it they way they did. It isn't like 900 is a huge portion of sales. Can we say "one-time expenditure" and "tax write-off"?

Exactly, since the Worldcom news is so wide spread in the news its easy for them to just point the finger. You are truly correct when you say that it is their job to pay us for "sales".

[Wiredoctor]

Gothweb you are 100% correct. If you work for any company and you do your job, they must pay you, it is of no concern to you whether or not they get paid from whomever they are doing business with. What ibill is doing is actually fraud. Civil and criminal action can be taken against them.

This is similiar to what the scum at gib (the dialer) did about a year ago. The scum bags didnt pay thousands if not millions in owed debts because they "claimed" they didnt get paid themselves, and then continued doing business like nothing happened.