Can someone explain some server jargon?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Groove
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2003
    • 3852

    #1

    Can someone explain some server jargon?

    EV1 says their private racks are "connected to our
    network through a dedicated 100 Mbps link."

    But this is clearly not enough bandwidth if you go and
    fill the rack with 20 x 10 Mbps unmetered boxes.

    On their private rack info page:

    http://www.ev1servers.net/english/privateracks.asp

    they say, "If a second 3COM switch is required (when a rack is
    used for unmetered servers), a setup fee of $1,000 is required."

    So the "switch" is the "100 Mbps link", is that right?

    Are there any drawbacks or limitations associated with having 2 x
    100 Mbps switches on a rack as opposed to having a single
    200 Mbps switch, eg would it affect a load balancing setup?

    And what's the difference between a managed and unmanaged switch?
  • johndoebob
    Confirmed User
    • Mar 2004
    • 3405

    #2
    Originally posted by Groove
    EV1 says their private racks are "connected to our
    network through a dedicated 100 Mbps link."

    But this is clearly not enough bandwidth if you go and
    fill the rack with 20 x 10 Mbps unmetered boxes.

    On their private rack info page:

    http://www.ev1servers.net/english/privateracks.asp

    they say, "If a second 3COM switch is required (when a rack is
    used for unmetered servers), a setup fee of $1,000 is required."

    So the "switch" is the "100 Mbps link", is that right?
    I think so but you better ask the support about it.

    Comment

    • Groove
      Confirmed User
      • Jan 2003
      • 3852

      #3
      Hello, calling all server gurus

      Comment

      • keyDet79
        Confirmed User
        • Feb 2003
        • 1109

        #4
        A managed switch can be managed remotely through an interface, an unmanaged switch can not. But why do you think 100mbit won't be enough for 20x 10mbit? You could definately fit 15 on it, with some overselling and it won't slow down. Unless it's for your own project and you expect them to be maxed out 24/7.
        Last edited by keyDet79; 09-10-2004, 06:52 AM.

        Multihomed quality BW for less
        ICQ 51034232 - MSN [email protected] - Email keydet(at)vibehosting.com

        Comment

        • Groove
          Confirmed User
          • Jan 2003
          • 3852

          #5
          Originally posted by keyDet79
          A managed switch can be managed remotely through an interface, an unmanaged switch can not.
          Thanks for the explanation

          But why do you think 100mbit won't be enough for 20x 10mbit? You could definately fit 15 on it, with some overselling and it won't slow down. Unless it's for your own project and you expect them to be maxed out 24/7.
          It's for my own project. I am looking at the possibility of using multiple load-balanced 10Mbit boxes in a private rack with the bandwith allowances aggragated into a single allowance of 200Mbit/mo (assuming 20 boxes). There's no way that I'lll go even close to using 200Mbit initially. I just want to make sure that I am not going to end-up with a scenario where as things expand, I am not able to make maximum use of the available bandwidth and rack space.

          Comment

          Working...