When free speech hurts..

[DemonitizedPorn]

The Supreme Court has held that the First Amendment protects the right to possess obscene material in one’s own home, Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969), so long as it’s not actual CSAM, Osborne v. Ohio, 495 U.S. 103 (1990). More recently, the Court held that the First Amendment also protects “virtual” CSAM that does not involve any actual children, Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234 (2002). Under that series of cases, Anderegg contended, the First Amendment protects his private possession of obscene AI-generated CSAM. https://www.techpolicy.press/court-r...enerated-csam/

Obviously, the trolls and Karens are going to play the moral outrage card. .. But, this is still a win for freedom of speech. ... They're going to show AI down our throats regardless whether we want it or not. ... At least this decision gives society a small pathway out of authoritarianism

They reality of what needs to happen next is : (-1-) Parents need to start doing their job and watch over their kids (-2-) Go after the real pedos who actually rape kids and leave the masturbators and doll fuckers alone.

.. Personally, I think a pedo who satisfies his perversion by jerking to fake AI and leaves REAL KIDS ALONE is a win.