2257 Question

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tombarr
    Confirmed User
    • Jul 2003
    • 320

    #1

    2257 Question

    I am wondering how the new proposed 2257 changes will affect adult retail websites that post pictures of box covers of videos that require 2257 information.

    Hard to imagine a website with thousands of videos on the site, being able to comply with this.

    Gay Paycheck
    Clickx Network Hard Link Trades, Blog Roll Trades - 110 Straight and 40 Gay Niches
  • freeadultcontent
    Confirmed User
    • Oct 2002
    • 9976

    #2
    Most box cover fronts are censored now anyways.

    Exclusive Ethnic & Microniche Sites

    Comment

    • Imageauction
      Confirmed User
      • Dec 2002
      • 355

      #3
      Censoring does nothing to change whether the underlying conduct is actual sexually explicit conduct.

      tombarr brings up a good point. In my letter to the DOJ I argue that the inclusion of webmasters is wrong and that "managing the content of a website" no more makes one a producer than managing the contents of your video store.

      see my draft at http://www.2257.com/draft_letter.htm
      SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

      Comment

      • madthumbs
        Confirmed User
        • Mar 2002
        • 339

        #4
        ImageAuction .. can you ICQ me @ 8057295 .. please? I have something I'd like to ask and also mention a few other flaws that I think would be worthy of inclusion in your letter.

        Comment

        • Sarah_Jayne
          Now with more Jayne
          • Dec 2002
          • 40077

          #5
          Originally posted by Imageauction
          Censoring does nothing to change whether the underlying conduct is actual sexually explicit conduct.

          tombarr brings up a good point. In my letter to the DOJ I argue that the inclusion of webmasters is wrong and that "managing the content of a website" no more makes one a producer than managing the contents of your video store.

          see my draft at http://www.2257.com/draft_letter.htm

          EXACTLY...i want to know if Blockbuster has to have all the details of all the actresses in the adult films they rent out. I am sure that falls undere mere distribution but still it was a fly up my ass.


          My hubby has been talking to a UK lawyer most of the day to try to figure out a way around post our address on the web but I have no idea what has been said.

          Comment

          • Doctor Dre
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Jan 2001
            • 51692

            #6
            Blah blah blah ... 50 2257 questions a day . and none is answered
            Originally posted by rayadp05
            I rebooted, deleted temp files, history, cookies and everything...still cannot view the news clip. All I see is that fucking gay ass music video from "Rick Roll". Anyone else have a different link to the news clip?

            Comment

            • freeadultcontent
              Confirmed User
              • Oct 2002
              • 9976

              #7
              Originally posted by Doctor Dre
              Blah blah blah ... 50 2257 questions a day . and none is answered
              Sarah basicly covered it. That is a clear case of meer distribution.

              Exclusive Ethnic & Microniche Sites

              Comment

              • FightThisPatent
                Confirmed User
                • Aug 2003
                • 4090

                #8
                Originally posted by freeadultcontent
                Sarah basicly covered it. That is a clear case of meer distribution.




                -brandon

                http://www.t3report.com
                (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
                http://www.FightThePatent.com
                | ICQ 52741957

                Comment

                Working...