Free host speculation...?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gkk
    Confirmed User
    • Jul 2001
    • 169

    #1

    Free host speculation...?

    Does anyone have any ideas/data about this... I was wondering, if you consider ALL revenue generated by the galleries on a free host (i.e. the revenue going to the hosting company + the revenue earned by the webmasters) would it be:-

    A) MUCH less than webmasters could earn building those galleries themselves on their own "clean" host
    B) Less than webmasters could earn building those galleries themselves on their own "clean" host
    C) About the same
    D) More, etc.
    E) Much more, etc.

    In other words, does the revenue from gallery sponsors + host sponsors <=> the revenue one could make from the SAME galleries if they were "clean"?
    Flashcash : Converting 1:700 with *crap* traffic!
  • pr0
    rockin tha trailerpark
    • May 2001
    • 23088

    #2
    Its all about the $...if you have the $ to send it to your own host & take the first few months as a loss....your cool. If you don't then you use freehosts.

    Either way you make $....its cool

    But i'd say your own clean galleries are much better.
    __________
    Loadedca$h - get sum! - Revengebucks - mmm rebills! - webair (gotz sErVrz)

    Comment

    • The Truth
      Confirmed User
      • Jul 2001
      • 920

      #3
      hahaha... very generic question...

      Some people can make enough to host their own galls and some can't even make enough to pay a phone bill on free hosts... and some free hosts have it figured out and can make their money off a few smart sponsor links and some can't so they 404 like mad or just close the doors.

      ------------------
      Make $$$ the All New Diabolical Way

      Comment

      • gkk
        Confirmed User
        • Jul 2001
        • 169

        #4
        You see, my train of thought went something like this...

        IF you know enough to make money off CLEAN galleries

        AND

        most TGP lists accept "relatively clean" galleries i.e. galleries with light headers

        THEN

        would you be better off pretending to be on a freehost i.e. putting a (slightly smaller than the *real* freehosts) header and footer on every gallery.

        Would this make more, the same or less money than leaving the clean galleries unadorned with headers and footers?

        Or is this just TOO devious?
        Flashcash : Converting 1:700 with *crap* traffic!

        Comment

        • Mango
          Confirmed User
          • Aug 2001
          • 474

          #5
          Keep in mind that TGP's tend to accept more galleries from a paid host than a free host.

          Reasons : better uptime, faster servers (in most of the cases), less banners, less 404's, ...

          ------------------
          CobaltWeb - High Volume Hosting - $0.70-$0.61 per GB - Plans from $13.99 per Month - No Setup Fee
          ---The End of Free Hosting---



          SponsorReport.com : the MASSIVE SPONSOR TEST PROJECT. 100% neutral and verified submissions only.
          Launched April, 7 - Get your FREE T-SHIRT NOW !
          We will send our webmasters to YOUR sponsor with YOUR referral ID

          Comment

          Working...