Why is that?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dij
    Confirmed User
    • May 2003
    • 2163

    #1

    Why is that?



    Persiankitty traffic.


    This free site.
    http://www.teaselinks.com/art/american_butts/

    What is wrong with it?
    Is it the site, is it the ads, is it the content, or is it the sponsor (AdultPlatinum)?
    Any advice would be appreciated
    Last edited by dij; 09-14-2003, 06:57 PM.
  • Spunky
    I need a beer
    • Jun 2002
    • 133978

    #2
    Url?

    Comment

    • dij
      Confirmed User
      • May 2003
      • 2163

      #3
      sorry, it's there now

      Comment

      • gothweb
        Confirmed User
        • Jun 2002
        • 8849

        #4
        Is 1:700 bad, on a freesite with freesite traffic? I wouldn't think people looking for free would end up spending a ton of money.

        Photos by Ian X.: Distinctive photos of goth babes.
        Blood Money:Your traffic, my sites, our money.
        MojoHost: Still the best.

        Comment

        • Dirty F
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Jul 2001
          • 59204

          #5
          Originally posted by gothweb
          Is 1:700 bad, on a freesite with freesite traffic? I wouldn't think people looking for free would end up spending a ton of money.
          I dont think hes talking about that.

          Comment

          • rowan
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Mar 2002
            • 17393

            #6
            Is "Qualified" uniques or enter/join page clicks? My stats always show Qualified at about 1/2 to 1/3 the value of Raw, so I assumed it was uniques... seeing your stats makes me think otherwise.

            Comment

            • Lane
              Will code for food...
              • Apr 2001
              • 8496

              #7
              Originally posted by gothweb
              Is 1:700 bad, on a freesite with freesite traffic? I wouldn't think people looking for free would end up spending a ton of money.
              looks like he got almost 7k cliks to the ads

              Comment

              • dij
                Confirmed User
                • May 2003
                • 2163

                #8
                Originally posted by gothweb
                Is 1:700 bad, on a freesite with freesite traffic? I wouldn't think people looking for free would end up spending a ton of money.
                I've got 7K clicks on sponsor's paysite. And it's freesite traffic, even TGP's ratio doesn't go that high.

                Comment

                • dij
                  Confirmed User
                  • May 2003
                  • 2163

                  #9
                  Originally posted by rowan
                  Is "Qualified" uniques or enter/join page clicks? My stats always show Qualified at about 1/2 to 1/3 the value of Raw, so I assumed it was uniques... seeing your stats makes me think otherwise.

                  I have other sites wich show 1:4- 1:5 ratio between raw/qual.

                  But why is it so high on this one, I mean is americanbutts.com such a bad site? Or it's my site? hmm

                  Comment

                  • dij
                    Confirmed User
                    • May 2003
                    • 2163

                    #10
                    this will bring us closer to 2mln

                    Comment

                    • GTS Mark
                      Vrume Mark
                      • Jan 2001
                      • 20912

                      #11
                      I would'nt be pointing the dirty finger at PK, you might want to ask Lens why the conversions are not up to snuff...

                      I have always done exceptionally well with her traffic.

                      DH

                      Comment

                      • dij
                        Confirmed User
                        • May 2003
                        • 2163

                        #12
                        Originally posted by DrinkingHard
                        I would'nt be pointing the dirty finger at PK, you might want to ask Lens why the conversions are not up to snuff...

                        I have always done exceptionally well with her traffic.

                        DH
                        I am not pointing any fingers at anyone, especially not at PK.
                        I am sure her traffic is great, and it must be something on my side. That's what I am trying to figure out, so I won't do the same mistake twice.

                        Comment

                        • evildick

                          #13
                          I clicked on your content to see the fullsize images and I never got a boner.

                          That's your problem right there. Those are some pretty crappy and pixelated fullsize shots to try to push an ass site with.


                          Comment

                          • dij
                            Confirmed User
                            • May 2003
                            • 2163

                            #14
                            Originally posted by evildick
                            I clicked on your content to see the fullsize images and I never got a boner.

                            That's your problem right there. Those are some pretty crappy and pixelated fullsize shots to try to push an ass site with.


                            I was thinking that it might be the content. But if it was it, people wouldn't click on my ads in the first place. But they actually click there, and don't buy.

                            Comment

                            • evildick

                              #15
                              Originally posted by dij


                              I was thinking that it might be the content. But if it was it, people wouldn't click on my ads in the first place. But they actually click there, and don't buy.
                              I almost clicked on your ads as the site was loading because of the somewhat misleading enter link (Click here) and the half page ad on the second page that made it look like thumbnails were in it.

                              I'm on a slow connection so it was taking a while for your "enter" graphics and your "gallery 1" and "gallery 2" graphics to appear.

                              So it could be people clicking by accident.

                              Comment

                              • dij
                                Confirmed User
                                • May 2003
                                • 2163

                                #16
                                Originally posted by evildick


                                I almost clicked on your ads as the site was loading because of the somewhat misleading enter link (Click here) and the half page ad on the second page that made it look like thumbnails were in it.

                                I'm on a slow connection so it was taking a while for your "enter" graphics and your "gallery 1" and "gallery 2" graphics to appear.

                                So it could be people clicking by accident.

                                hmmm, that makes sense.
                                I'll make enter link more visible, and put gallery 1/2 at the top and see how I do.

                                Thanks

                                Comment

                                Working...