Business Partnership proposal

[Adam Fadeev]

Hello,
I am a manager of the Melbet affiliate program. We are open to cooperation with webmasters and partners operating in Tier 1 and Tier 2 GEOs, as well as the Canadian market.

We invite you to a mutually beneficial partnership and monetization of your websites.

What we offer:

High conversion rates driven by a strong brand and well-localized products
Fully integrated local payment solutions across multiple regions
Flexible partnership conditions

Cooperation models:

RevShare (share of the bookmaker’s profit) — up to 50%
CPA — from $5 to $200 per acquired player

We would be glad to discuss the terms and find the most effective cooperation model for your traffic.

[fuzebox]

What geos do you support? melbetaffiliates.com doesn't list them.

[todservices]

What geos do you support? melbetaffiliates.com doesn't list them.

Just ask AI the correct question

Why do most casino affiliate programs that are offshore do not display publicly the geos they accept? Is there any legal reason why they are doing that?

Yes. In most cases, it is deliberate, and mainly for legal and business-risk reasons.


1 - Licensing complexity
A casino may accept traffic from 50+ countries, but only hold licenses for a few,
and use different entities/skins/payment processors depending on the geo.
If they publicly list all accepted countries, regulators can easily check inconsistencies.

Example:
Curaçao license, but taking players from Germany, France, Spain, Ontario, etc.
That can create legal exposure.

2 - Avoiding regulator attention
Many offshore casinos operate in a grey zone:
not fully illegal, but not fully licensed locally either.
Publicly advertising: “We accept players from Spain” can be interpreted by some regulators as actively targeting that market.

That increases risk of:
payment blocking,
ISP blocking,
fines,
blacklists,
pressure on affiliates.


3 - Geo rules change constantly
Countries move from:
tolerated,
to restricted,
to fully banned.

Instead of updating public pages constantly, casinos prefer:
internal geo filters,
KYC filtering,
affiliate manager guidance.



4 - They want plausible deniability
A common offshore approach is: “We do not target restricted jurisdictions.”
Even if players from those countries can technically register.
That legal wording matters.

It is similar to:
VPN companies,
crypto exchanges,
CFD brokers


5 - Affiliate flexibility
They may:
allow one affiliate to run Brazil traffic,
forbid another,
whitelist certain campaigns,
test geos quietly.
Keeping geo rules private gives them flexibility.


6 - Some geos are tolerated until withdrawal/KYC
A casino may allow:
deposit,
gameplay,
even wins,
but later restrict withdrawals after KYC if the player is from a problematic jurisdiction.