Another digital video camera question

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • boneprone
    Hall Of Fame
    • Jan 2001
    • 34415

    #1

    Another digital video camera question

    Im looking not only for a good digital video camera, but looking for one that takes still pics as well. Im not referring to a digital that does stills because I know the wuality is poor, but looking for a camera that does good video and ok to good photos as well for around 800.00

    Is it possible, and does anyone recomned one they have heard of or used.

    ------------------
    Webmaster/Owner
    www.boneprone.com
    icq: 66883099

    Industry Hall Of Fame Legend Mike Jones
    Bow to the Power - Still BP4L
    http://gfyawards.com/hall-of-fame
    Learn about it kids.
  • Dyanna
    Registered User
    • Feb 2001
    • 43

    #2
    I still haven't seen one that even makes OK photos - best I've seen does 640 X 480 and they look awful (compared to even a 100 dollar still camera), unless it's a close-up shot.

    We use a Canon Elura and it does have progressive scan still capability - not sure what the price is now since we bought it a while back, but at the time it was the best out there. Something better may have come along though by now

    And if you do find a good one PLEASE let us know! LOL

    I do know one guy runing a site and I'll ask him what they are using right now. It generally takes them a few days to answer email but if you don't hear something from me shoot me an email to remind me.

    Comment

    • Corpsie
      Confirmed User
      • Jan 2001
      • 474

      #3
      Most camcorders take really shitty still images, they don't look too bad when you reduce them to 50% (360x240) but even then it looks "wide" and adds 20 pounds to people.

      It's better to get a still camera for that purpose also. It will keep the wear and tear off of your camcorder (which will cost more to repair and has more moving parts)
      If you're trying to objectify the subjective, you need to stop breathing.

      Comment

      • exit69
        Registered User
        • Feb 2001
        • 62

        #4
        I have to definately agree with the others when saying you want to have a seperate camera for stills. I do alot of things with my DV cam however generally stills from it are of less than optimal quality... blury, too much motion, etc etc... you want to get a stand alone that you can use for stills..

        Now, the question is does that break your budget then? I've seen some inexpensive DV cams.. JVC's GR-DVF31 is currently like 460 on Cnet's Shopper.com (electronics, Camcoders, digital video, sort by price), which would leave you a bit of room for a decent still camera as well

        -- Kevin

        Comment

        • Corpsie
          Confirmed User
          • Jan 2001
          • 474

          #5
          If you do get more equipment, check out http://www.jandr.com/ for the best prices.

          You have to call them though and haggle.
          I got my Sony 570D (dvd player) for $380
          instead of $450 (everywhere else)

          Comparison shopping rocks!
          If you're trying to objectify the subjective, you need to stop breathing.

          Comment

          • misterwalrus
            Confirmed User
            • Jan 2001
            • 270

            #6
            I have to agree with everyone else on this one
            Trades and Exchanges
            Submit to XXX Blog Index Growing Daily
            XXX Blog Maniac Hardlinks
            Battlin Bitchs Hardlinks and Traffic Trades
            XXX Blog Feeds

            Comment

            Working...