hosting (network) question

[CrazyMartin]

I'm looking for very fast US hosting
with very good connection to whole world

i'm consider choopa and webair

i tested their ips by network looking glass and it seems that both have very similar pings and response

anyone know even faster dedicated provider?

i know that cdns are faster, but i use realtime scripts, so i cant use cds for this

[CrazyMartin]

i mean choopa and leaseweb.com
not webair

who else have very good connections to the net?

[klinton]

any big company has what you looking for
nationalnet, mojohost should also have what u need

[yuu.design]

go with MOJOHOST

[CrazyMartin]

mojohost?? i checked some responses from many places
and it looks average, i mean cheap
but price is high.. for that response

https://lg.he.net

pings from karupsha.com which is hosted by mojo

from amsterdam: 125 ms
london: 100 ms
los angeles: 61 ms
hamurg: 124ms
warsaw: 142
calgary: 72ms

pings from choopa:
from amsterdam: 84 ms
london: 71 ms
los angeles: 63 ms
hamurg: 93ms
warsaw: 100ms
calgary: 49ms

this is not even comparable to choopa

i looking for something better than choopa

[CrazyMartin]

national, little better than mojo

amsterdam: 112ms
london: 136ms
los angeles: 52ms
hamburg: 115ms
warsaw: 124ms
calgary: 51ms

leaseweb (washington DC):
amsterdam: 123ms
london 116ms
los angeles: 88ms
hamburg: 149ms
warsaw: 149ms
calgary: 74ms

interservers.net: (my atom server)
amsterdam: 88ms
london: 125ms
los angeles: 65ms
hamburg: 90ms
warsaw: 99ms
calgary: 46ms



choopa wins, do you know something faster?

[Brad Mitchell]

With all due respect, it doesn't appear that you know how to research the question you are asking. The ping times don't represent any specific performance, only a single network path from one place on the internet to another. This is essentially the speed of light across a specific path.

Each of the hosts connects to multiple carriers. I can't speak for the others, but we connect to 4 of the 5 worlds most well connected carriers. What I can say is that you obviously haven't looked at our shopping carts on MojoHost or Portal Home - MojoHost, B.V.. They're not expensive, and if you think they are then you haven't looked at many other hosting web sites.

The larger affect on performance is going to be packet loss. Packet loss more than the speed of light is what has a greater affect on surfing experience and throughputs. Ping times and trace routes only represent one network path. My network, like that of competitors, has many paths in and out. Ping times from Hurricane Electric's looking glass are just that, one view of the Internet. We peer with HE, so the ping times you see from them are a result of the actual distances (speed of light) and also of their network construction and they are a discount network with significantly less infrastructure than all of the paid IP transit providers we connect to.

From the list of competitors that you listed, we are the only company using technology that improves upon traditional BGP by doing real time traffic analysis. We utilize the Noction | Intelligent Routing Platform platform in both of our datacenters and make about 45,000 route improvements daily to lower latency, avoid internet congestion, black holes and outages. In other words, I can prove that we are faster with the network intelligence we have in place.

Feel free to email or Skype me if you have more questions.

Brad

[Brad Mitchell]

To your question about who has the best connections to the net- we are the only host located within a NAP, a true Network Access Point. There are more than 200 phone companies in our data center and hundreds of other networks. The site we are in is the gateway to south and central Americas.

https://www.equinix.com/locations/un...ta-center/mi1/

Cheers,

Brad

[JasonCollins]

+1 for Brad & MojoHost!