What could go wrong? (Google)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • baddog
    So Fucking Banned
    • Apr 2001
    • 107089

    #1

    Business What could go wrong? (Google)

    Google to Remove Search Results for Unauthorized Postings of Sexually Explicit Images - XBIZ.com
  • blackmonsters
    Making PHP work
    • Nov 2002
    • 20970

    #2
    Google is doing the jerk a favor by removing revenge porn.
    The law is coming down hard on that stuff.

    Google to remove 'revenge porn' from search results
    Free Open Source Live Aggregated Cams Script (FOSLACS)

    Comment

    • Barry-xlovecam
      It's 42
      • Jun 2010
      • 18083

      #3
      Private Enterprise has no legal obligation to advocate free speech.

      By linking to criminal ''revenge porn'' content Google could have to defend numerous, albeit frivolous, civil suits. They have safe harbor if they unknowingly link to content that may be criminal. Civil suit is another story ...

      However, I can see a lot of false claims happening for various reasons -- this policy will become a can-of-worms. Could get interesting as they would then have knowledge of the fact.

      Comment

      • baddog
        So Fucking Banned
        • Apr 2001
        • 107089

        #4
        Try thinking beyond revenge porn. Think about the porn chick that found Jesus and says all her content is unauthorized.

        Comment

        • freecartoonporn
          Confirmed User
          • Jan 2012
          • 7683

          #5
          why this? isnt DMCA already in place ?
          SSD Cloud Server, VPS Server, Simple Cloud Hosting | DigitalOcean

          Comment

          • Bladewire
            StraightBro
            • Aug 2003
            • 56228

            #6
            Originally posted by baddog
            Try thinking beyond revenge porn. Think about the porn chick that found Jesus and says all her content is unauthorized.
            Yes

            Every cam girl, and cam boy, erased by request


            Skype: CallTomNow

            Comment

            • Bladewire
              StraightBro
              • Aug 2003
              • 56228

              #7
              Originally posted by Barry-xlovecam
              Private Enterprise has no legal obligation to advocate free speech.
              This is how legalizing censorship begins.

              You do know that U.S. business technology is primarily responsible for Chinese internet censorship, right?

              Just a taste of what's been done: "In December 2010, MIIT started requiring websites to register their true identities. The government said this was to crackdown on pornography websites, but opponents say it has been another way for China to create a list of approved websites and block innocent websites." SOURCE

              Your business, or your religion, gives you the right to censor and discriminate in America. sucks. must change.














              Skype: CallTomNow

              Comment

              • L-Pink
                working on my tan
                • Mar 2005
                • 39151

                #8
                Originally posted by Barry-xlovecam
                Private Enterprise has no legal obligation to advocate free speech.

                Originally posted by Bladewire
                This is how legalizing censorship begins.

                Actually that's how it's always been.

                Comment

                Working...