Interesting thread

[Paul Markham]

http://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=879790

Who would of thought?

[Harmon]

[Paul Markham]

I got some things right. Big mistake on the length of the recession. No one knows how long that will be.

[slapass]

The US recession has been over for a while.

"In a 1975 New York Times article, economic statistician Julius Shiskin suggested several rules of thumb for defining a recession, one of which was "two down consecutive quarters of GDP"."

[Kolargol]

Who would of thought?

What does it mean?

[sake]

Nasty facial!

[epitome]

LOL the recession started long before your post, Paul. Clueless as always.

[seeandsee]

THIS IS INTERESTING

[L-Pink]

"Interesting thread" .......... not then, not now.

.

[signupdamnit]

It's always interesting to read old threads here if you have some free time. Especially when you go back five or six years. There are certain patterns which constantly repeat themselves. You see a BROgram arise hot as ever for the first six months with the smae peopel praising them, still going strong for a year or two, suddenly everyone is complaining about shaving. You see the same people moving around in employment from one shady operation to the next. Sponsor A shuts down, Sponsor B arises from the same people six months to a year later. Then you see the same people getting scammed over and over again by different companies in nearly the same way each and every time.

Then there are all the people who disappear. You click on a few sigs and almost always find they are gone. It's like a grave yard. I'm sure one day historians will be studying our old internet posts.

[Harmon]

"Interesting thread" .......... not then, not now.

.

[DamianJ]

A much more interesting old thread is when you lied about getting loads of sign ups for your site, then someone found out your join links weren't working.

Bump that one instead!

[epitome]

A much more interesting old thread is when you lied about getting loads of sign ups for your site, then someone found out your join links weren't working.

Bump that one instead!

That is a great thread. Markham is so full of fail that I don't know how he is able to walk the jigsaw with all that fail hanging off him.

[L-Pink]

A much more interesting old thread is when you lied about getting loads of sign ups for your site, then someone found out your join links weren't working.

Bump that one instead!

Haha, you're just mad he wouldn't share that magic trick.

[Double trouble]

interesting .......

[L-Pink]

interesting .......

I was a little backed up that day.

.

[2intense]

[DamianJ]

Very intersting

[Paul Markham]

The US recession has been over for a while.

"In a 1975 New York Times article, economic statistician Julius Shiskin suggested several rules of thumb for defining a recession, one of which was "two down consecutive quarters of GDP"."

It's coming back to you very soon.

The turmoil in the EU is going to bring it back.

This is my prediction, for what it's worth. Credit will get harder to find and keep. Credit card companies will be more diligent about who they let run up big over drafts. This coupled with the job losses and slow downs will mean less money is spent online.

The upside will be companies who currently advertise on sites where the theme is give it away to get traffic to sell advertising space are going to find advertisers very hard to find and scrutinizing what they spend is worth it. People advertising on the Net to just get "branding" are going to be looking at the cost.

They will not care if a site has 1,000,000 visitors a day if only 10 buy something.

This will mean free sites, that are not free to run, will need to also need watch their costs.

Those who cut their costs to under their income will have a better chance of surviving.

A. Well CC card companies did tighten up and unemployment soared. Online spending increased, so wrong there. Except in porn.

B. Advertising on Tubes is now funding free porn, which is hitting sales. Still a lot of webmasters forums have closed because no one is buying ads to brand themselves.

C. Yes people are now even more aware of the ROI on advertising.

D. Are there less people running free sites today than in the past?

E. Was always correct.

[martinsc]

[BAKO]

Bump for magic joins

[DamianJ]

Bump for the failed stalker.

[Jakez]

Is this guy just going to live out his last days or years mumbling on a forum?

[Paul Markham]

Is this guy just going to live out his last days or years mumbling on a forum?

No I'm going to do lots of things besides poking fun. I see the lack of debate as proof you have nothing sensible worth posting.