Quote:
|
Originally Posted by will76
... <snip> 3. 100% wrong, "" The U.S. District Court in Denver will hold a preliminary injunction hearing on August 8, 2005, after which the judge will determine whether to issue a further injunction. "" The District court in Denver set the date for August 8, the DOJ can not change this.
...<snip...
|
This is probably the most salient argument for the decision that was made... Why? Because it gives the adult industry MORE TIME to get compliant. Had the FSC gotten a TRO as they had planned, it would have lasted 10 DAYS. It could POSSIBLY be extended another 10 days, but there would be no guarantee of that happening. At the end of the TRO period, a hearing would have been conducted to determine the merits of a Preliminary Injunction. If the Preliminary Injunction was not granted (for whatever reason, maybe the judge's daughter's husband just got caught by their 10 year old daughter (the judges granddaughter) wankin' off to porn on the computer over the weekend and it pissed him off...) then everyone would be subject to inspection by the DOJ by July 21. At least this way, you all have until September to get your shit together...
