Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kimmykim
TCG is a program name, not an actual company that sends out checks unless I'm mistaken. So if the company -- ie third party -- that actually owns the sites or cuts the checks is differently named than TCG -- then I'm sure that JB has taken the steps necessary to make sure there is consistency between the site ownership and the record keeping.
I'd also guess the simplest way to describe it is just like they did in the email.
|
I was talking about the "secondary producers". This definitely does not qualify as them
having the documents and meeting 2257?