"GirlsDoPorn" being sued for lying to girls.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hawkeye
    Confirmed User
    • Feb 2002
    • 1291

    #1

    "GirlsDoPorn" being sued for lying to girls.

    The civil trial against a San Diego-based porn website accused of lying to young women to get them to have sex on camera continues, however, the whereabouts of the owner is now unknown.

    On Tuesday, attorneys for the 22 women who are suing the website, Girls Do Porn, its owner Michael Pratt, videographer Matthew Wolfe, and actor and director Ruben “Andre” Garcia, said they were informed that Pratt was no longer in the country, despite being under subpoena to testify.

    “We have been informed that [Pratt] is no longer in the jurisdiction and is no longer available to testify, even though he is under court order to here in court,” said lead attorney Ed Chapin.

    As reported by NBC 7 Investigates, 22 women filed a lawsuit against the company for allegedly setting up an elaborate scheme to coax them into having sex on camera. The men did so, according to testimony from the women as well as interviews with NBC 7, by using aliases, and false promises that the videos would be sold only to private collectors in foreign countries on DVDs; never to be posted online.

    To help convince the women, the men paid so-called “reference models” who, according to testimony, knowingly lied to prospective models to get them to agree to fly to San Diego to shoot the videos.

    https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/loc...560615211.html
  • SpicyM
    Confirmed User
    • Aug 2006
    • 4575

    #2
    Originally posted by Hawkeye
    videos would be sold only to private collectors in foreign countries on DVDs; never to be posted online.
    yeah, the DVD market is thriving these days, especially porn
    no sig, sorry

    Comment

    • Ferus
      Bye - Left to do stuff
      • Feb 2013
      • 4108

      #3
      Originally posted by SpicyM
      yeah, the DVD market is thriving these days, especially porn
      que Paul ....

      I heard that if you say "DVD market" 3 times, he will show up

      Comment

      • OneHungLo
        So Fucking Banned
        • May 2001
        • 40906

        #4
        Mike's on the run?



        The funny thing is he was one of my first affiliates back in 2000. He took the premise of my sites and did it for real lol.

        Comment

        • King Mark
          So Fucking Banned
          • Aug 2016
          • 27033

          #5
          It's all onehungs fault, as usual...

          Comment

          • Grapesoda
            So Fucking Banned
            • Jul 2003
            • 46238

            #6
            The government told me they were going to use my tax money for health care and the feed the hungry then they gave the cash to a bunch of losers in Syria who can I sue?

            Comment

            • el_mago
              So Fucking Banned
              • Sep 2017
              • 353

              #7
              Originally posted by Ferus
              que Paul ....

              I heard that if you say "DVD market" 3 times, he will show up
              Did you mean queue? Or are you speaking español?

              Comment

              • InfoGuy
                80/20 Rule
                • Apr 2010
                • 3052

                #8
                Hundreds of Women Who Agreed to Model Swimsuits Were Forced to Perform in Porn, Lawsuit Alleges

                Girls like myself have considered suicide as the only way out. I want the victims to know they have a voice. I want to put this company and industry of amateur porn to an end.
                One company goes rogue and everyone else, legit or not, gets thrown under the bus.

                Pratt and his colleagues relied on Craigslist to find women between the ages of 18-22, but in the advertisements for “Exceptionally Cute Ladies Wanted,” Girls Do Porn wasn’t mentioned anywhere. They completely misrepresented themselves as BeginModeling.com casting swimsuit models.

                After the girls agreed, they were flown to San Diego, but instead of modeling gigs, they were told the job was actually to appear in an adult film. The women were reassured that their videos would only be released on DVD to collectors in Australia and New Zealand, not online.

                If you’re wondering how this scheme could be sex trafficking, allow us to introduce you to the Trafficking Victims Protection Act.

                In 2000, in response to reports of international human trafficking, one of the broadest U.S. bipartisan coalitions in history came together to pass the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, or TVPA. [1] The landmark legislation identified “severe forms” of human trafficking, imposed harsh criminal penalties for offenders, and provided support systems for the victims. [2]
                The TVPA defines sex trafficking as a situation in which “a commercial sex act is induced by force, fraud, or coercion, ...
                If Michael Pratt is indeed on the run, potential criminal charges after the civil suit may be the reason.
                Support American Heroes | How Bad is My Batch? | Vaccine Deaths & Adverse Reactions | Free Speech Coalition | <WARNING> ePayService / Guerra Capital, INC / MTACC payments | Flirt4Free Fucks their Affiliates | Don't do business with piece of shit Andy Alvarez from Webmaster Central / VR3000, who said:
                "If it was up to me, they would have shot all 30,000 of those country loving shitheads"

                Comment

                • Paul Markham
                  Too old to care
                  • Jun 2001
                  • 52942

                  #9
                  So girls turn up to do swimwear and do hardcore porn instead?

                  What does the model release say?



                  Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                  PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                  Comment

                  • czarina
                    Webmaster Extraordinaire
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 10752

                    #10
                    I just don't understand why there's even a case here. If I am hired to model swimsuits and then I am asked to do porn, I just say no (unless I'm OK with doing porn), it's that simple. They did it because they wanted the money. So they enjoyed the money and now are upset that people are jerking off to their videos online? Seriously, I would think the court system has better things to do...

                    Comment

                    • Klen
                      • Aug 2006
                      • 32235

                      #11
                      Originally posted by czarina
                      I just don't understand why there's even a case here. If I am hired to model swimsuits and then I am asked to do porn, I just say no (unless I'm OK with doing porn), it's that simple. They did it because they wanted the money. So they enjoyed the money and now are upset that people are jerking off to their videos online? Seriously, I would think the court system has better things to do...
                      Yes that does not have sense, especially even if agreement "sold only to private collectors" was followed, what exactly is preventing collectors to put it online ?

                      Comment

                      • Mickey_
                        • Nov 2005
                        • 4238

                        #12
                        Originally posted by czarina
                        I just don't understand why there's even a case here. If I am hired to model swimsuits and then I am asked to do porn, I just say no (unless I'm OK with doing porn), it's that simple. They did it because they wanted the money. So they enjoyed the money and now are upset that people are jerking off to their videos online? Seriously, I would think the court system has better things to do...
                        Thankfully the law is slightly more intricate than what you describe.


                        LifeSelector Affiliates - Make money today promoting the online porn of tomorrow.

                        mb [at] lifeselector.com

                        Comment

                        • Forest
                          Confirmed User
                          • Aug 2001
                          • 9135

                          #13
                          What does the contract or release say?

                          Comment

                          • InfoGuy
                            80/20 Rule
                            • Apr 2010
                            • 3052

                            #14
                            Originally posted by czarina
                            I just don't understand why there's even a case here. If I am hired to model swimsuits and then I am asked to do porn, I just say no (unless I'm OK with doing porn), it's that simple. They did it because they wanted the money. So they enjoyed the money and now are upset that people are jerking off to their videos online? Seriously, I would think the court system has better things to do...
                            If I understand correctly, the defendants are recruiting girls nationally and flying them into San Diego with the pretense to do swimsuit modeling. As most of these girls are young and likely to be naive and have limited resources, they would be more vulnerable to fraud and coercion than someone who is older and has more resources available.

                            A possible scenario would be the defendants pay for flights into San Diego and say the job is to perform in porn. If the girls don't perform, then they would have to find their own way home. It may be easy for a local girl to refuse the ultimatum in this possible scenario, but difficult for a girl traveling cross country, who would then need a last minute flight costing hundreds of dollars to get home.
                            Support American Heroes | How Bad is My Batch? | Vaccine Deaths & Adverse Reactions | Free Speech Coalition | <WARNING> ePayService / Guerra Capital, INC / MTACC payments | Flirt4Free Fucks their Affiliates | Don't do business with piece of shit Andy Alvarez from Webmaster Central / VR3000, who said:
                            "If it was up to me, they would have shot all 30,000 of those country loving shitheads"

                            Comment

                            • celandina
                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                              • Jun 2006
                              • 11721

                              #15
                              the stupidity of these women is amazing....but hey, the war on porn has begun so they probably win

                              Andrea Dworking lives on !

                              Comment

                              • Struggle4Bucks
                                Sieg Hi!
                                • May 2011
                                • 3615

                                #16
                                People standing at the Assembly line at $7.25 an hour is human trafficking and exploitation too.
                                Half troll half amazing!

                                Comment

                                • nakedby
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Oct 2006
                                  • 43

                                  #17
                                  I once heard of a producer telling women he was shooting them for a college project and they were so suripised to find their images online. Some guys are really bad ass.

                                  Comment

                                  • jsmih
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Oct 2010
                                    • 334

                                    #18
                                    Another story on the trial:

                                    https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...th-new-models/

                                    Comment

                                    • Cameltoepro
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Sep 2012
                                      • 1526

                                      #19
                                      How much was he paying them I wonder?
                                      Awesome Hosting At Awesome Pricing At Vacares

                                      Comment

                                      • SpicyM
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Aug 2006
                                        • 4575

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by Struggle4Bucks
                                        People standing at the Assembly line at $7.25 an hour is human trafficking and exploitation too.
                                        Exactly! This is what I think everytime I hear these moralists bitch about porn industry, exploitation and prostitution yet they are OK with this low pay slavery. $7.25 would even be considered a premium pay rate for workers here, fucking feminazi hypocrites.
                                        no sig, sorry

                                        Comment

                                        • SpicyM
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Aug 2006
                                          • 4575

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by Paul Markham
                                          What does the model release say?
                                          Yeah, if they gave consent to publish and sell the material it doesnt matter they claim they thought it would be for private collectors.
                                          no sig, sorry

                                          Comment

                                          • CaptainHowdy
                                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                                            • Dec 2004
                                            • 94727

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by celandina
                                            Andrea Dworking
                                            Satan ! !

                                            Comment

                                            • Rochard
                                              Jägermeister Test Pilot
                                              • Dec 2001
                                              • 75733

                                              #23
                                              We never lied to get girls to model for us, but then again we were doing really softcore stuff. Towards the end they were doing a little bit more hardcore stuff but that was after we had gotten to know them very well.

                                              There is no need to lie... Just throw money at them.
                                              Herschel Savage
                                              Brooklyn, NY

                                              Comment

                                              • Cameltoepro
                                                Confirmed User
                                                • Sep 2012
                                                • 1526

                                                #24
                                                love to see which girls are in the complaint, to see their vids.
                                                Awesome Hosting At Awesome Pricing At Vacares

                                                Comment

                                                • OneHungLo
                                                  So Fucking Banned
                                                  • May 2001
                                                  • 40906

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by SpicyM
                                                  Yeah, if they gave consent to publish and sell the material it doesnt matter they claim they thought it would be for private collectors.
                                                  The problem is, they have 22 girls claiming they (GDP) misrepresented the contract.

                                                  If it was just one girl that was making this claim it wouldn't be a problem.

                                                  22 is a problem. It shows they were patently trying to deceive these girls and that deception can null and void any contract.

                                                  Comment

                                                  • The Porn Nerd
                                                    Living The Dream
                                                    • Jun 2009
                                                    • 19784

                                                    #26
                                                    The interesting thing is these girls were more than willing to act like cock crazed sluts on film IF only a small number of people would see it.

                                                    I bet they are just pissed they didn't get paid enough rather than being shocked or shamed. Watch the videos. These girls are complete whores.
                                                    My Affiliate Programs:
                                                    Porn Nerd Cash | Porn Showcase | Aggressive Gold

                                                    Over 90 paysites to promote!
                                                    Now on Teams: peabodymedia

                                                    Comment

                                                    • SpicyM
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • Aug 2006
                                                      • 4575

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by OneHungLo
                                                      The problem is, they have 22 girls claiming they (GDP) misrepresented the contract.

                                                      If it was just one girl that was making this claim it wouldn't be a problem.

                                                      22 is a problem. It shows they were patently trying to deceive these girls and that deception can null and void any contract.
                                                      I am talking about their claim, that they did not know the content would be published online, because this seems to be the most important thing they bring up. It looks like some of them signed the contract only because they though it would be a private video - well this argument would be quite invalid if the contract stated they agreed with publishing.

                                                      Just because a contract is nullified, it does not mean it can't be used as an evidence in court showing they KNEW it was intended to go online. I bet they didn't even read it before signing it. Beside that, a court has to rule a contract void - and that has not happened yet, has it?
                                                      no sig, sorry

                                                      Comment

                                                      • SpicyM
                                                        Confirmed User
                                                        • Aug 2006
                                                        • 4575

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by The Porn Nerd
                                                        The interesting thing is these girls were more than willing to act like cock crazed sluts on film IF only a small number of people would see it.

                                                        I bet they are just pissed they didn't get paid enough rather than being shocked or shamed. Watch the videos. These girls are complete whores.
                                                        Another interesting thing is that as it seems they all started to bitch after they found the videos online - not right after they "forced" them to shoot. Which is rather interesting. Does that show they are more concerned about the content being published and not about them being forced to perform in a porn shoot???
                                                        no sig, sorry

                                                        Comment

                                                        • OneHungLo
                                                          So Fucking Banned
                                                          • May 2001
                                                          • 40906

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by SpicyM
                                                          Beside that, a court has to rule a contract void - and that has not happened yet, has it?
                                                          I believe, from what I've read, that's the hurdle they need to overcome. Once they can prove they were deceived (GDP lying and misrepresenting the contract) then they can void the contract. Once it's voided, they then can say due to their misrepresentation, they've suffered from it.

                                                          Every model release pretty much says that the producer can redistribute it via any medium they want - film, dvd, print, internet, broadcast etc. Now GDP telling the girls they weren't going to do that, well, you can't do that. Hence the plaintiffs lawyer having 22 girls in the complaint all showing GDP patently lied.

                                                          And you have to remember, this is a civil trial. This is not "beyond a reasonable doubt," this is "could this have possibly happened." The burden of proof is much less.


                                                          We've always been upfront with the models and told them do not do this if you have a problem with someone seeing it because they can and most likely will see this. We record them reading the contract. We record them agreeing to everything so they can't come back and claim otherwise. And it actually saved our asses a few years ago. A girl we shot back in 2007 claimed she was drunk and didn't sign a contract. Her attorney contacted us and we sent over the video along with the model release.. he replied "thank you gentleman, have a nice day." And that was the end of that.

                                                          Comment

                                                          • SpicyM
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Aug 2006
                                                            • 4575

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by OneHungLo
                                                            A girl we shot back in 2007 claimed she was drunk and didn't sign a contract. Her attorney contacted us and we sent over the video along with the model release.. he replied "thank you gentleman, have a nice day." And that was the end of that.
                                                            It would be easily provable whether the signature/handwriting is hers or not, even without the video, but yeah, I film them too.
                                                            no sig, sorry

                                                            Comment

                                                            • OneHungLo
                                                              So Fucking Banned
                                                              • May 2001
                                                              • 40906

                                                              #31
                                                              Just out today...

                                                              A Porn Company Whistleblower’s Shocking Testimony: Attacks, Lies, and Cover-Ups

                                                              https://www.thedailybeast.com/a-porn...ups?ref=scroll

                                                              Comment

                                                              • SBJ
                                                                So Fucking Fabulous
                                                                • Apr 2003
                                                                • 11387

                                                                #32
                                                                Originally posted by Rochard
                                                                We never lied to get girls to model for us, but then again we were doing really softcore stuff. Towards the end they were doing a little bit more hardcore stuff but that was after we had gotten to know them very well.

                                                                There is no need to lie... Just throw money at them.
                                                                yup, I always told the truth to my girls too. They knew I was doing it for the internet. I told them that your family will find your pics/vids at some point and if they didn't then I wasn't doing my job marketing their content. They were happy I was straight with them.

                                                                I had a HOT college girl that was going to be a lawyer and I basically talked her out of doing modeling cause it would hurt her career.

                                                                Comment

                                                                • Grisey
                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                  • Jan 2004
                                                                  • 1805

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by SBJ
                                                                  I had a HOT college girl that was going to be a lawyer and I basically talked her out of doing modeling cause it would hurt her career.
                                                                  Ditto mate i've refused girls that do law/teaching/nursing because those are jobs for life.

                                                                  Once a girl is expecting a certain amount after flying out to shoot contentand is told no sorry you are fucking if you want any money at all. They could have there own hotel bill to pay or anything it puts any girl in a bad place.

                                                                  It's a shitty business practice.
                                                                  Segpay Suck Ass Worse Billing Company
                                                                  Allurecash Scammers and don't pay

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • Paul Markham
                                                                    Too old to care
                                                                    • Jun 2001
                                                                    • 52942

                                                                    #34
                                                                    https://www.thedailybeast.com/a-porn...ups?ref=scroll

                                                                    Pratt sounds like an asshole that Moses worked for for over 3 years?????



                                                                    Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                                                                    PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • celandina
                                                                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                      • Jun 2006
                                                                      • 11721

                                                                      #35
                                                                      Originally posted by CaptainHowdy
                                                                      Satan ! !
                                                                      Indeed she was , but she is back from the dead via these type of lawsuits. After all she was the one who introduced this dictum: "A woman has no right to consent to participate in pornography"....

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • tony286
                                                                        lurker
                                                                        • Aug 2002
                                                                        • 57021

                                                                        #36
                                                                        Originally posted by OneHungLo
                                                                        The problem is, they have 22 girls claiming they (GDP) misrepresented the contract.

                                                                        If it was just one girl that was making this claim it wouldn't be a problem.

                                                                        22 is a problem. It shows they were patently trying to deceive these girls and that deception can null and void any contract.
                                                                        i thought i would never say this to you but you are right. : ) One girl you can say liar, 22 it was a problem. Also you would be shocked how naive young people can be even though they basically grew up with the internet.Also no one should do porn until 28 yrs old. At point all the discussion making parts of the brain are all matured.

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • pornguy
                                                                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                          • Mar 2003
                                                                          • 62912

                                                                          #37
                                                                          Originally posted by InfoGuy
                                                                          If I understand correctly, the defendants are recruiting girls nationally and flying them into San Diego with the pretense to do swimsuit modeling. As most of these girls are young and likely to be naive and have limited resources, they would be more vulnerable to fraud and coercion than someone who is older and has more resources available.

                                                                          A possible scenario would be the defendants pay for flights into San Diego and say the job is to perform in porn. If the girls don't perform, then they would have to find their own way home. It may be easy for a local girl to refuse the ultimatum in this possible scenario, but difficult for a girl traveling cross country, who would then need a last minute flight costing hundreds of dollars to get home.
                                                                          Then If they strand them they go to the cops and things get solved.

                                                                          Sadly I agree with Czarina. All they had to do was say no.

                                                                          People need to own their actions now days.
                                                                          PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic

                                                                          AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
                                                                          TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • Grapesoda
                                                                            So Fucking Banned
                                                                            • Jul 2003
                                                                            • 46238

                                                                            #38
                                                                            Originally posted by nakedby
                                                                            I once heard of a producer telling women he was shooting them for a college project and they were so suripised to find their images online. Some guys are really bad ass.
                                                                            many agents play this game

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • Grapesoda
                                                                              So Fucking Banned
                                                                              • Jul 2003
                                                                              • 46238

                                                                              #39
                                                                              Originally posted by OneHungLo
                                                                              The problem is, they have 22 girls claiming they (GDP) misrepresented the contract.

                                                                              If it was just one girl that was making this claim it wouldn't be a problem.

                                                                              22 is a problem. It shows they were patently trying to deceive these girls and that deception can null and void any contract.
                                                                              a lawyer put that together, no way 22 models would suddenly decide to sue

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • Grapesoda
                                                                                So Fucking Banned
                                                                                • Jul 2003
                                                                                • 46238

                                                                                #40
                                                                                Originally posted by Cameltoepro
                                                                                How much was he paying them I wonder?
                                                                                I think I heard at the time, 3-7K

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • Grapesoda
                                                                                  So Fucking Banned
                                                                                  • Jul 2003
                                                                                  • 46238

                                                                                  #41
                                                                                  Originally posted by Rochard

                                                                                  There is no need to lie... Just throw money at them.

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • Grapesoda
                                                                                    So Fucking Banned
                                                                                    • Jul 2003
                                                                                    • 46238

                                                                                    #42
                                                                                    Originally posted by OneHungLo
                                                                                    I believe, from what I've read, that's the hurdle they need to overcome. Once they can prove they were deceived (GDP lying and misrepresenting the contract) then they can void the contract. Once it's voided, they then can say due to their misrepresentation, they've suffered from it.

                                                                                    Every model release pretty much says that the producer can redistribute it via any medium they want - film, dvd, print, internet, broadcast etc. Now GDP telling the girls they weren't going to do that, well, you can't do that. Hence the plaintiffs lawyer having 22 girls in the complaint all showing GDP patently lied.

                                                                                    And you have to remember, this is a civil trial. This is not "beyond a reasonable doubt," this is "could this have possibly happened." The burden of proof is much less.


                                                                                    We've always been upfront with the models and told them do not do this if you have a problem with someone seeing it because they can and most likely will see this. We record them reading the contract. We record them agreeing to everything so they can't come back and claim otherwise. And it actually saved our asses a few years ago. A girl we shot back in 2007 claimed she was drunk and didn't sign a contract. Her attorney contacted us and we sent over the video along with the model release.. he replied "thank you gentleman, have a nice day." And that was the end of that.
                                                                                    I have stopped a few productions after getting clear indications that the model lacked understanding of the situation as far as publication

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • Grapesoda
                                                                                      So Fucking Banned
                                                                                      • Jul 2003
                                                                                      • 46238

                                                                                      #43
                                                                                      Originally posted by pornguy
                                                                                      Then If they strand them they go to the cops and things get solved.

                                                                                      Sadly I agree with Czarina. All they had to do was say no.

                                                                                      People need to own their actions now days.
                                                                                      young women have a hard time saying no. these guys are experts at getting young women to say yes. I heard this story countless times about anal scenes, IR and gang bangs. sad fact of life.

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • InfoGuy
                                                                                        80/20 Rule
                                                                                        • Apr 2010
                                                                                        • 3052

                                                                                        #44
                                                                                        Originally posted by pornguy
                                                                                        Then If they strand them they go to the cops and things get solved.

                                                                                        Sadly I agree with Czarina. All they had to do was say no.

                                                                                        People need to own their actions now days.
                                                                                        It's not so simple as to just say the girls should have gone to the police. In a perfect world, there would be justice for all. But I suspect in this type of situation, police would say that it's a contract dispute and a civil matter that is not under their jurisdiction.

                                                                                        Even if there was a crime, many victims don't report them. I'm not saying what happened to these girls with GDP was sexual assault, but some might perceive what happened as being a sexual crime. According to mcasa.org's Reporting Sexual Assault: Why Survivors Often Don’t,

                                                                                        Survivors cite the following reasons for not reporting a sexual assault:
                                                                                        •Fear of reprisal
                                                                                        •Personal matter
                                                                                        •Reported to a different official
                                                                                        •Not important enough to respondent
                                                                                        •Belief that the police would not do anything to help
                                                                                        •Belief that the police could not do anything to help
                                                                                        •Did not want to get offender in trouble with law
                                                                                        •Did not want family to know
                                                                                        •Did not want others to know
                                                                                        •Not enough proof
                                                                                        •Fear of the justice system
                                                                                        •Did not know how
                                                                                        •Feel the crime was not “serious enough”
                                                                                        •Fear of lack of evidence
                                                                                        •Unsure about perpetrator’s intent
                                                                                        Support American Heroes | How Bad is My Batch? | Vaccine Deaths & Adverse Reactions | Free Speech Coalition | <WARNING> ePayService / Guerra Capital, INC / MTACC payments | Flirt4Free Fucks their Affiliates | Don't do business with piece of shit Andy Alvarez from Webmaster Central / VR3000, who said:
                                                                                        "If it was up to me, they would have shot all 30,000 of those country loving shitheads"

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • OneHungLo
                                                                                          So Fucking Banned
                                                                                          • May 2001
                                                                                          • 40906

                                                                                          #45
                                                                                          Originally posted by pornguy
                                                                                          Then If they strand them they go to the cops and things get solved.

                                                                                          Sadly I agree with Czarina. All they had to do was say no.

                                                                                          People need to own their actions now days.
                                                                                          Yeah but stranding them isn't a criminal offense.

                                                                                          And I do agree they could have just said "no" but when you factor everything in i.e. the lying, the coercion, misrepresentation of the contracts (saying it was only going to be on DVD outside of the US) and having TWENTY TWO girls testify that GDP had a pattern of this = GDP going tits up.

                                                                                          Most civil cases get settled out of court so I wonder if GDP even offered any kind of settlement to the girls.

                                                                                          It's going to be interesting to see how this all plays out. My guess is the girls win and win BIG.

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • SpicyM
                                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                                            • Aug 2006
                                                                                            • 4575

                                                                                            #46
                                                                                            This is why it's million times better to work with professional models. They already know how the production works, their families know what they do, their friends know as their content is on the net and since they usually do that for living, they don't try to hide it at all, so there are no worries about dealing with "my mom / boyfriend / grandma / boss found my videos online"
                                                                                            no sig, sorry

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • adultchatpay
                                                                                              Let's Make Money
                                                                                              • Dec 2008
                                                                                              • 8785

                                                                                              #47
                                                                                              Originally posted by czarina
                                                                                              I just don't understand why there's even a case here. If I am hired to model swimsuits and then I am asked to do porn, I just say no (unless I'm OK with doing porn), it's that simple. They did it because they wanted the money. So they enjoyed the money and now are upset that people are jerking off to their videos online? Seriously, I would think the court system has better things to do...
                                                                                              Exactly!

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • RTP
                                                                                                aka Jimmy James
                                                                                                • Nov 2006
                                                                                                • 1335

                                                                                                #48
                                                                                                this shit is legit wild.

                                                                                                GDP, Russians...Cartel https://www.nbcsandiego.com/investig...510221931.html

                                                                                                Jimmy James ATKingdom/AMK Empire Since 1996 - My Movies
                                                                                                Home of ATKGirlfriends - Where we take pornstars on trips...and fuck them.
                                                                                                Connect with me on LinkedIn

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                • PornDiscounts-V
                                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                                  • Oct 2003
                                                                                                  • 5744

                                                                                                  #49
                                                                                                  Are these girls dumb as fuck?
                                                                                                  Blog Posts - Contextual Links - Hardlinks on 600+ Blog Network
                                                                                                  * Handwritten * 180 C Class IPs * Permanent! * Many Niches! * Bulk Discounts! GFYPosts /at/ J2Media.net

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  • nikki99
                                                                                                    Supermodel
                                                                                                    • Nov 2004
                                                                                                    • 23087

                                                                                                    #50
                                                                                                    2 pages of dumb sluts
                                                                                                    SMC Revenue - Best Tgirl websites of the world now VR
                                                                                                    Non exclusive BIG Tranny/shemale Package for sale, full 2257 - hit me up skype: nikkimontero

                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                    Working...