Tubes and The FCC?s New Net Neutrality Proposal

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NobleSavage
    Registered User
    • Jun 2006
    • 58

    #1

    Tubes and The FCC?s New Net Neutrality Proposal

    The chairman is proposing to adopt the rules under Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996.

    What would Sherlock Holmes do with such an intriguing, completely geeky clue? How will this destroy the Internet, you ask?

    First, let me give away the ending first, and then I?ll explain how the clue revealed it all to me.

    This is what we already know. The FCC is going to propose that cable and phone companies such as Verizon, AT&T, and Time Warner Cable are allowed to discriminate against them, giving some websites better service and others worse service. Cable and phone companies will be able to make preferred deals with the companies that can afford to pay high fees for better service. They will even be allowed to make exclusive deals, such as making MSNBC.com the only news site on Comcast in the priority tier, and relegating competitors to a slow lane. The FCC is authorizing cable and phone companies to start making different deals with thousands or millions of websites, extracting money from sites that need to load quickly and reliably. So users will notice that Netflix or Hulu works better than Amazon Prime, which buffers repeatedly and is choppy. New sites will come along and be unable to compete with established giants. If we had had such discrimination a decade ago, we would still be using MySpace, not Facebook, because Facebook would have been unable to compete.
    http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_te...you_think.html

    If the FCC destroys net neutrality could this kill the tube business model? They are very high bandwidth and the ISPs just might to start charging them for transit.
  • xXXtesy10
    Fakecoin Investor
    • Jul 2012
    • 7127

    #2
    Originally posted by NobleSavage
    http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_te...you_think.html

    If the FCC destroys net neutrality could this kill the tube business model? They are very high bandwidth and the ISPs just might to start charging them for transit.

    Take some time to read doper.
    WARNING: Stay Away From Marlboroack aka aka Brandon Ackerman
    http://gfy.com/21169705-post8.html
    Donny Long is Felon, Stalker, Scammer & Coward
    http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/...lon-int-761244

    Comment

    • Best-In-BC
      Confirmed User
      • Jun 2002
      • 9509

      #3
      What a peace of shit bill, so much for freedom
      Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More
      Unparked domains burning a hole in your pocket? 5 Simple Ways to Make Easy $$$ from Unused Domains

      Comment

      • NobleSavage
        Registered User
        • Jun 2006
        • 58

        #4
        Originally posted by Best-In-BC
        What a peace of shit bill, so much for freedom
        Yep. It's been all over the internet the last week with everyone complaining, but it seems the porn world (which would be greatly affected) is clueless.

        Here is a Slashdot discussion on the topic:
        http://tech.slashdot.org/story/14/04...-destroying-it

        The New Yorker

        http://www.newyorker.com/online/blog...eutrality.html

        The Washington Post

        http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...-the-internet/

        Article at Vice

        http://www.vice.com/read/former-comc...l-the-internet


        Netfflix already payed off Comcast and you can see the speed increase they got in this graph: http://knowmore.washingtonpost.com/2...et-neutrality/

        Comment

        • Best-In-BC
          Confirmed User
          • Jun 2002
          • 9509

          #5
          No, people are conditioned to not talk about what is important.
          Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More
          Unparked domains burning a hole in your pocket? 5 Simple Ways to Make Easy $$$ from Unused Domains

          Comment

          • oppoten
            NAME THE JEW
            • Nov 2007
            • 4791

            #6
            If we had had such discrimination a decade ago, we would still be using MySpace, not Facebook, because Facebook would have been unable to compete.
            Facebook was the *kosher* alternative, and I'm sure that its usefulness to government agencies was in place even then. The money would have been found because it HAD to succeed.

            If the tubes have the right backers then I'm sure they'll do just fine.

            Comment

            • woj
              <&(©¿©)&>
              • Jul 2002
              • 47880

              #7
              "If we had had such discrimination a decade ago, we would still be using MySpace, not Facebook, because Facebook would have been unable to compete."

              This whole discussion is full of loaded terms like "discrimination", "slow lane", etc... but isn't the gist of it, that some companies want to pay extra to get their data delivered faster? Isn't that exactly like amazon.com paying extra to get their packages delivered faster?
              Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000
              Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager
              Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip Manager

              Comment

              • crockett
                in a van by the river
                • May 2003
                • 76818

                #8
                Originally posted by woj
                "If we had had such discrimination a decade ago, we would still be using MySpace, not Facebook, because Facebook would have been unable to compete."

                This whole discussion is full of loaded terms like "discrimination", "slow lane", etc... but isn't the gist of it, that some companies want to pay extra to get their data delivered faster? Isn't that exactly like amazon.com paying extra to get their packages delivered faster?
                No, because these very same internet providers have been paid our tax dollars as subsidies in order to improve their backbones. Tax payers have already paid for fiber networks to our homes, but the companies took the money and ran, not delivering on their promises. Tax payers have greatly subsidized the networks these companies use to make profits with.

                It's not like they built it all themselves on their own dime.
                In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                Comment

                • TFCash
                  Confirmed User
                  • Apr 2001
                  • 1738

                  #9
                  I'd say the large corps that run the backbone are doing what they want anyway.

                  My AT&T DSL connection only gets 150GB of traffic a month, if I go over it's $10 per 50GB, and I noticed that my Cox Cable connection was running at sub-par for the last week. So I tested and got 5Mb/sec on a 50Mb/sec line. When I called, I was told that I'd used 400GB of traffic in the last 30 days and that an abuse ticket had been opened to alert me to the fact that my wireless must have been compromised Little did they know that I was just downloading my content orders. No mention that they had capped me somehow, but miraculously my download speeds returned to normal while I was on the phone with them

                  So yes they are already getting anyone that uses outside of what they consider the normal amount of traffic. Cell phone companies do the same thing.

                  I'm not sure there is a lot we can do to change it
                  TeenFlood.com Online since 1998.

                  TFCash KissMeGirl
                  VirginRiches MondoBucks

                  tim at tfcash.com or submit a ticket at our HelpDesk

                  Comment

                  • InfoGuy
                    80/20 Rule
                    • Apr 2010
                    • 3052

                    #10
                    While I generally don't like Google analyzing every bit of data they can get, the extra competition from their fiber network will help keep the traditional telcos and cable companies from getting too aggressive.
                    Support American Heroes | How Bad is My Batch? | Vaccine Deaths & Adverse Reactions | Free Speech Coalition | <WARNING> ePayService / Guerra Capital, INC / MTACC payments | Flirt4Free Fucks their Affiliates | Don't do business with piece of shit Andy Alvarez from Webmaster Central / VR3000, who said:
                    "If it was up to me, they would have shot all 30,000 of those country loving shitheads"

                    Comment

                    • Struggle4Bucks
                      Sieg Hi!
                      • May 2011
                      • 3615

                      #11
                      I guess slate.com is allready in slow lane as it took 15 seconds to load the page
                      Half troll half amazing!

                      Comment

                      • NobleSavage
                        Registered User
                        • Jun 2006
                        • 58

                        #12
                        Originally posted by InfoGuy
                        While I generally don't like Google analyzing every bit of data they can get, the extra competition from their fiber network will help keep the traditional telcos and cable companies from getting too aggressive.
                        It's going to be interesting how this plays out. Time Warner and Comcast are merging (as you probably know). They will OWN the last mile. Google Fiber is only in Kansas City and soon to expand into several other cities. They are not much of a competitor on the consumer ISP level. Yet the vast majority of the population will have to go through them to get to the internet OR Google. That is when they can tell Google, "pay us xxxxx$" or we will degrade your service.

                        Comment

                        • Barry-xlovecam
                          It's 42
                          • Jun 2010
                          • 18083

                          #13
                          In the end game the ISPs will get exactly what they don't want -- to be regulated as a public utility in the United States.

                          With the advent of the "Internet of Things" your power meter, refrigerator, house alarm, etc.. may need an Internet connection to fully function. Thirty percent of workers will work from home remotely over the Internet in the next 10 years. E-Commerce will account for an ever-growing share of the economy.

                          At that point, Internet connectivity is no longer an option and will be regulated for the public good as a utility. Regulation as a utility will not lower the costs of service necessarily.

                          If you observe the Federal highway system, and the federal and state DOT, the fuel taxes for passenger vehicles and common carrier trucking operators -- you get the picture of the likely pattern that the FCC may follow. ISPs may have to get approval for tariff rates (price tiers and rate hikes).

                          I would expect the Telcos and Cable companies to fuck themselves over with their own greed.

                          So either way, the Internet will cost more -- pick your poison ...

                          I would not overestimate the importance of tubes or porn video in this issue, they are minor players in the big picture.

                          Comment

                          • JuicyBunny
                            So Fucking Banned
                            • Jun 2010
                            • 2145

                            #14
                            Americans already getting boned. I pay less in japan for a 100 mbs connection ($38 a month) vs 3 dollars more for Verizon in LA at 1-5 mbs max. The "right people" tubes will be fine.
                            Last edited by JuicyBunny; 04-27-2014, 03:16 PM.

                            Comment

                            • xXXtesy10
                              Fakecoin Investor
                              • Jul 2012
                              • 7127

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Barry-xlovecam
                              In the end game the ISPs will get exactly what they don't want -- to be regulated as a public utility in the United States.

                              With the advent of the "Internet of Things" your power meter, refrigerator, house alarm, etc.. may need an Internet connection to fully function. Thirty percent of workers will work from home remotely over the Internet in the next 10 years. E-Commerce will account for an ever-growing share of the economy.

                              At that point, Internet connectivity is no longer an option and will be regulated for the public good as a utility. Regulation as a utility will not lower the costs of service necessarily.

                              If you observe the Federal highway system, and the federal and state DOT, the fuel taxes for passenger vehicles and common carrier trucking operators -- you get the picture of the likely pattern that the FCC may follow. ISPs may have to get approval for tariff rates (price tiers and rate hikes).

                              I would expect the Telcos and Cable companies to fuck themselves over with their own greed.

                              So either way, the Internet will cost more -- pick your poison ...

                              I would not overestimate the importance of tubes or porn video in this issue, they are minor players in the big picture.
                              Telephone companies live and breath regulatory. Most have entire departments dedicated to compliance. You'd be amazed how easy it is to add a new fee to your bill.
                              WARNING: Stay Away From Marlboroack aka aka Brandon Ackerman
                              http://gfy.com/21169705-post8.html
                              Donny Long is Felon, Stalker, Scammer & Coward
                              http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/...lon-int-761244

                              Comment

                              • InfoGuy
                                80/20 Rule
                                • Apr 2010
                                • 3052

                                #16
                                Originally posted by Struggle4Bucks
                                I guess slate.com is allready in slow lane as it took 15 seconds to load the page
                                This brings up another issue of SERPs, as ranking algorithms use page loading time as a variable.
                                Support American Heroes | How Bad is My Batch? | Vaccine Deaths & Adverse Reactions | Free Speech Coalition | <WARNING> ePayService / Guerra Capital, INC / MTACC payments | Flirt4Free Fucks their Affiliates | Don't do business with piece of shit Andy Alvarez from Webmaster Central / VR3000, who said:
                                "If it was up to me, they would have shot all 30,000 of those country loving shitheads"

                                Comment

                                • notinmybackyard
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Sep 2012
                                  • 3230

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Best-In-BC
                                  What a peace of shit bill, so much for freedom
                                  Only because I have read and heard this comment from others that I have to ask the questions....

                                  What the hell is your definition of *Freedom*?
                                  And since when did the Internet become synonymous with the concept of *freedom*?
                                  officially retired as of March 01 2018 but still fucking around and getting into shit.

                                  Comment

                                  • suesheboy
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Nov 2002
                                    • 5211

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by crockett
                                    No, because these very same internet providers have been paid our tax dollars as subsidies in order to improve their backbones. Tax payers have already paid for fiber networks to our homes, but the companies took the money and ran, not delivering on their promises. Tax payers have greatly subsidized the networks these companies use to make profits with.

                                    It's not like they built it all themselves on their own dime.
                                    That's why I don't have high speed at one of my houses as no service is willing to run it even though it ends a few hundred yards away from me.
                                    Adult Web Site Domain Names For Sale
                                    Adult Sex Toy Domain Names For Sale
                                    Tantric Delights, Sex Toys Blog, Tantric Sex Toys

                                    Comment

                                    Working...