Hosted Tube Users

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • InfoGuy
    80/20 Rule
    • Apr 2010
    • 3052

    #51
    50 hosted tubes
    Support American Heroes | How Bad is My Batch? | Vaccine Deaths & Adverse Reactions | Free Speech Coalition | <WARNING> ePayService / Guerra Capital, INC / MTACC payments | Flirt4Free Fucks their Affiliates | Don't do business with piece of shit Andy Alvarez from Webmaster Central / VR3000, who said:
    "If it was up to me, they would have shot all 30,000 of those country loving shitheads"

    Comment

    • Paul Markham
      Too old to care
      • Jun 2001
      • 52942

      #52
      Originally posted by Colmike7
      What about content that gets a surfer to get off before realizing he has a cc?

      Ive seen that lower quality pics/video with an attractive girl or good hardcore content converts better because the surfer might think "Hey this is good, but I want to see it in HD" which is why I posted what I did...

      Plus I promote with thousands of longtails so that makes a difference being micro niche as opposed to porn quality..
      Obviously you are going to have a tough time turning the head of a guy who's coming to a Tube site with his lube ready. Giving him a 5 minute clip pulled out of the scene that was shot to get him off isn't going to work. Maybe he will click on the advert and become traffic you can sell at a few dollars per thousand is all that's left.

      However how about a video that makes him stop and think "this is interesting, lets look." and then "Hey this is good, but I want to see it in HD." and goes to the site. Is a video clip designed to get him off going to do that better than a video clip designed a produced to generate interest?

      Quality of the quality of the content is something I never mentioned and it's a good point, thank you for bringing it up. Maybe the quality is more than image definition, however this on a Tube due to compression is going to be lower than what the site offers. Style of the video also will have to be tailored to suit the style of the site it's promoting. Big tits glamor needs a different slant than amateur Ex GF.

      We all saw in a previous thread the ratios of the hosted Tube from PR. It seems now they are opening up to getting you to send traffic so that can sell it as the middle man. If that's a taste of the future then fine. I'm posting about generating interest in a paysite, after you guys have generated the traffic and done the job of filtering it.

      Not sure what longtails are, new word for me in porn. Porn quality is not about image definition. Quality amateur needs to be a different image definition than Playboy quality. It's like comparing a Ferrari with a Rolls, both quality cars, neither have a lot else in common, except price bracket.



      Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
      PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

      Comment

      • Paul Markham
        Too old to care
        • Jun 2001
        • 52942

        #53
        Originally posted by Eyeball
        The thread where the industries 'adapters' meets. looooooooooooool


        The only person talking about adapting is being told it's all wrong.



        Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
        PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

        Comment

        • Paul Markham
          Too old to care
          • Jun 2001
          • 52942

          #54
          Originally posted by PR_Glen
          that's a completely different product. People don't go to the theatre to alleviate sexual impulses, not compared to what we are selling, so comparing the two is nonsense.
          Interesting post. So what are you selling here. Traffic or a 30 day paysite join?

          If you're selling traffic, then obviously my idea isnt for you. If you're selling a 30 day porn site membership, then yes you need to closely examine the differences between the two mediums, a 120 minute film and a 43,200 minute membership.

          If people just come to tubes to jerk off and get on with their day. Then trying to convert them into paysite members needs something more than a pile of videos designed to get them off.

          If you're selling traffic, then getting them to the site and getting a few to become traffic and eventually buy, then your content is fine for this.

          I would dearly love people to tell me what's wrong with this idea, if their aim is to sell memberships and not traffic.
          Last edited by Paul Markham; 02-01-2012, 12:54 AM.



          Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
          PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

          Comment

          • porno jew
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Nov 2006
            • 10166

            #55
            stop ruining this thread go start another shitty thread no one cares about.

            Comment

            • DWB
              Registered User
              • Jul 2003
              • 31779

              #56
              Originally posted by globofun
              Could you tell us a bit more about Traffic Force?
              It's where Jedi Knights trade traffic.

              Comment

              • Jakez
                Confirmed User
                • Jan 2004
                • 5656

                #57
                Originally posted by PR_Dave
                Interstitial ads and in-video ads are coming too.

                Brand new premium sections is being added.

                Top end mobile templates as well.
                So you will be changing where the "PREMIUM" link goes?
                [email protected] - jakezdumb - 573689400

                Killuminati

                Comment

                • Failed
                  Confirmed User
                  • Mar 2011
                  • 2301

                  #58
                  Originally posted by epitome
                  Like Fabian said in one thread awhile back, 3 minutes are best for sales, 5+ are best for increasing traffic.

                  Would be cool if there were a way to mix.
                  This is naturally done, to a point. If you notice some videos may have a 23:00 time length, for example, but only play a 1 minute teaser clip. I emailed support because I thought this may have been a bug. They replied that if it's exclusive content, it will always be a clip. So, setting full length isn't a bad idea when there are going to be teasers automatically mixed within the tube.
                  (ICQ - 664784872)

                  Comment

                  Working...