Photo/Camera guys, help me out?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Brujah
    Beer Money Baron
    • Jan 2001
    • 22157

    #1

    Photo/Camera guys, help me out?

    Friend is taking a digital photography course and has a Kodak Z981 (14MP?) and says the results are grainy and needs a better camera. I thought 14 Megapixel was pretty good, but looking for something "much better" apparently. I said I'd ask around and see if I could get some good recommendations. Budget is < $1000
  • waltgator
    Confirmed User
    • May 2011
    • 1369

    #2
    depends on budget, canon t2im, 5d mk 2-7...sony alpha series dslr..just depends on what you want to spend...check www.bhphotovideo.com


    ICQ 448280936

    Comment

    • anexsia
      Confirmed User
      • May 2010
      • 5735

      #3
      Sounds like a question for Paul Markham

      Comment

      • HandballJim
        Confirmed User
        • Sep 2008
        • 4024

        #4
        I would go with a Canon...
        HOW I MAKE LOTS OF $$$

        Comment

        • jMEGA
          Confirmed User
          • Oct 2005
          • 671

          #5
          Canon T3i
          Design | SEO | Photo / Video Editing
          ( ICQ 49354667 )

          Comment

          • Jon Oso
            Confirmed User
            • Feb 2005
            • 2241

            #6
            You can pick up a Canon XSi for $500 or less. T2i for ~$800. If a 14mp camera is turning out grainy photos, I would look in the "User Error" part of the manual.
            icq 416133583
            My Blog
            Clips4Sale Store

            Comment

            • raymor
              Confirmed User
              • Oct 2002
              • 3745

              #7
              What would cause a 14MP image to be visibly grainy? I have a similar camera and while it's not a professional DSLR, I wouldn't expect visibly grainy pictures unless some setting was way out of whack.
              For historical display only. This information is not current:
              support&#64;bettercgi.com ICQ 7208627
              Strongbox - The next generation in site security
              Throttlebox - The next generation in bandwidth control
              Clonebox - Backup and disaster recovery on steroids

              Comment

              • WebCashMaker
                Confirmed User
                • Feb 2008
                • 1726

                #8
                Originally posted by raymor
                What would cause a 14MP image to be visibly grainy?
                Setting the ISO high will cause the pictures to come more grainy than using a lower ISO setting.




                Comment

                • mikesouth
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jun 2003
                  • 6334

                  #9
                  Judging the quality of a camera by its "megapixels" is like judging the value of a site by its Alexa rank.
                  Mike South

                  It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.

                  Comment

                  • Lace
                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                    • Mar 2004
                    • 16116

                    #10
                    MP means nothing at all...just how high of a resolution the photos will be.

                    Go with a nice canon slr!
                    Your Paysite Partner
                    Strength In Numbers!
                    StickyDollars | RadicalCash | KennysPennies | HomegrownCash

                    Comment

                    • Brujah
                      Beer Money Baron
                      • Jan 2001
                      • 22157

                      #11
                      Thanks, can you explain a little more about what contributes to the quality of a shot? Like others, I was confused and thought the 14MP meant it was probably really good quality. I realize there must be a difference between a ~$200 camera and a $800+ camera when both are 14/15 MP but I just don't know the difference myself.

                      Comment

                      • DeanCapture
                        Haters & Trolls SUCK!
                        • Dec 2002
                        • 9275

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Brujah
                        Friend is taking a digital photography course and has a Kodak Z981 (14MP?) and says the results are grainy and needs a better camera.
                        Bru...he probably doesn't need a better camera, he probably just needs to learn to use what he already has. You can take great pictures on a 2MP camera if you know what you're doing. And you can take grainy pictures on a 50MP camera if you don't know what you're doing

                        If he's taking a class, he should ask his instructor to analyze his camera and his pictures to figure out what the problem is. That $1000 that he's itching to spend on another camera can be used later to buy a better camera once he's learned the basics and needs the options that a more expensive camera may offer.

                        eMail me a few of his pics and I can probably figure out what the problem is
                        Last edited by DeanCapture; 10-18-2011, 09:46 PM.
                        Twitter: @DeanCapture
                        Instagram: @TheDeanCapture
                        DeanCapture "at" Gmail.com

                        Comment

                        • Brujah
                          Beer Money Baron
                          • Jan 2001
                          • 22157

                          #13
                          Originally posted by DeanCapture
                          Bru...he probably doesn't need a better camera, he probably just needs to learn to use what he already has. You can take great pictures on a 2MB camera if you know what you're doing. And you can take grainy pictures on a 50MB pictures if you don't know what you're doing

                          If he's taking a class, he should ask his instructor to analyze his camera and his pictures to figure out what the problem is. That $1000 that he's itching to spend on another camera can be used later to buy a better camera once he's learned the basics and needs the options that a more expensive camera may offer.

                          eMail me a few of his pics and I can probably figure out what the problem is
                          I'll try to get some tomorrow and email them to you. Thanks!

                          Comment

                          • MaxCandy
                            Confirmed User
                            • Sep 2003
                            • 3750

                            #14

                            Just upgraded my camera with a digital back
                            Need a High-End Custom Shoot?

                            Award Winning Producer / Director / Industry Consultant. Five of my Feature Films have been given top AVN / XBIZ / VENUS awards; How I Became A Sexual Slave 2016, L’Innocente 2014, Inglorious Bitches 2013, Ritual 2011 & Sexual Adventures of Little Red 2009

                            SINCE 1996 - IMDB Imdb.com - SAMPLES/AWARDS MaxCandy.com Email MaxCandy at MaxCandy.com

                            Comment

                            • Paul Markham
                              Too old to care
                              • Jun 2001
                              • 52942

                              #15
                              Originally posted by DeanCapture
                              Bru...he probably doesn't need a better camera, he probably just needs to learn to use what he already has. You can take great pictures on a 2MP camera if you know what you're doing. And you can take grainy pictures on a 50MP camera if you don't know what you're doing

                              If he's taking a class, he should ask his instructor to analyze his camera and his pictures to figure out what the problem is. That $1000 that he's itching to spend on another camera can be used later to buy a better camera once he's learned the basics and needs the options that a more expensive camera may offer.

                              eMail me a few of his pics and I can probably figure out what the problem is
                              What I was going to say. Needs someone to see what he's doing to see what's going wrong.

                              It cold be the ISO setting, light or just out of focus.



                              Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                              PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                              Comment

                              • leg4
                                Confirmed User
                                • May 2003
                                • 4429

                                #16
                                I've been watching this for about 2-4 months.

                                For that price, I would say get a Canon t3i.
                                >>> Contact me here

                                email me here

                                Comment

                                • leg4
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • May 2003
                                  • 4429

                                  #17
                                  By grainy, I bet he is taking about the gain.... he needs more light.
                                  >>> Contact me here

                                  email me here

                                  Comment

                                  • SmutHammer
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Mar 2008
                                    • 4301

                                    #18
                                    depends what he is using it for, I say Canon, if he is at all serious about his picture quality he should get at leaste a 60D, if he can afford it, go with a 7D or 5D, oh and your lense makes a big difference too. also lighting plays a big part in quality.

                                    Comment

                                    • will76
                                      Making $$$$ w/ ClickCash
                                      • May 2003
                                      • 18037

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by Brujah
                                      Friend is taking a digital photography course and has a Kodak Z981 (14MP?) and says the results are grainy and needs a better camera. I thought 14 Megapixel was pretty good, but looking for something "much better" apparently. I said I'd ask around and see if I could get some good recommendations. Budget is < $1000
                                      I hear that Alex (NALEM) is an expert that could help you. hehe
                                      ICQ: 86364801 Email: will [at] innovativeassets [dot] com

                                      PROGRAM SHIT LIST - DO NOT PROMOTE (click link for gfy thread)
                                      FNCash | Media Revenue

                                      Comment

                                      • rock-reed
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • May 2005
                                        • 1892

                                        #20
                                        Budget is <1000$
                                        ---
                                        Ethnic niche? Black-Asian-Latina ?
                                        Contact me and lets talk traffic.

                                        rockreed@ that thing they call the google mail

                                        When you E-mail Me, PLZZZZ make the Subject Title:

                                        >>>>>> GFY!

                                        So I do not lose you in Spam.

                                        Comment

                                        • PornoMonster
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Mar 2003
                                          • 2257

                                          #21
                                          The camera sucks.

                                          The resolution's been bumped up to 14 megapixels, but the photo quality is predictably worse than the 12-megapixel Z980. Although I typically have no major issues with Kodak's image processing, this model is inconsistent with color and exposure. Shooting performance is decent, mainly because CCD-sensor-based megazooms all have a tendency to perform slowly

                                          the 26mm-equivalent wide-angle lens with a 26x zoom, is disappointing, with very visible barrel distortion that Kodak doesn't correct for in its JPEG processing

                                          http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-20009720-1.html
                                          $6 a Month 4 Blade Razors, 4 Cartridges, Includes shipping!

                                          Domains 4 Sale CashForVideos.com - Pussy.biz - FootPorn.com - SoloMovie.com - CollegeGirlCams.com - AmateurCamGirls.com - PR3 4 Letter Domain

                                          Comment

                                          • raymor
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Oct 2002
                                            • 3745

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by Brujah
                                            Thanks, can you explain a little more about what contributes to the quality of a shot? Like others, I was confused and thought the 14MP meant it was probably really good quality. I realize there must be a difference between a ~$200 camera and a $800+ camera when both are 14/15 MP but I just don't know the difference myself.
                                            The megapixels tell you the maximum resolution, or minimum graininess. It WAS an important spec in the days of 0.5 and 1.0 MP, because you can tell the difference between 0.5MP and 1.0. People learned to check that spec. You can't see the difference between 12 and 16. Magazine quality is about 8 or better, so anything above 8 in a consumer camera is for marketing purposes.

                                            So what are some real differences? The biggest difference, by far, is just behind the screen. You can put me behind a $10,000 camera and my photos will still look decidely amateur. Photography classes shooting film use $100 cameras because it's the knowledge, skill, and technique that matter.

                                            Next, a good camera has full manual control so that the photog can set the aperture, iso, shutter speed, and other settings based on his knowledge. If you (or your friend) doesn't know how to calculate the right apeture for a given shutter speed and iso, he doesn't need a better camera. He needs the class. (So long as his camera has the manual settings that will be taught in the class.)

                                            Next up is the minimum fstop, how much light the lens allows in. Pros use those big lenses because they can let in more light, allowing more freedom in settings.

                                            After that you get into different types of metering and other features that are out of my depth. I just wanted to cover the main beginner points, especially that thing at the back of the camera, the photographer. That's what matters. David Lace could make a pinhole camera from a shoebox in about 2 minutes and probably shoot better than either of us would with a great camera.
                                            For historical display only. This information is not current:
                                            support&#64;bettercgi.com ICQ 7208627
                                            Strongbox - The next generation in site security
                                            Throttlebox - The next generation in bandwidth control
                                            Clonebox - Backup and disaster recovery on steroids

                                            Comment

                                            • raymor
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Oct 2002
                                              • 3745

                                              #23
                                              One more thought - a $1000 budget means $500 for the camera, $150 for the other lens, $120 for the off camera flash and bracket, $85 for the tripod ...

                                              My camera body was about 1/3rd of my total $1250 budget for a shooting rig. The pros here can help refine the numbers, but he definitely shouldn't blow all his money on a camera and then have red eye in every pic because he has no budget for off camera lighting.
                                              For historical display only. This information is not current:
                                              support&#64;bettercgi.com ICQ 7208627
                                              Strongbox - The next generation in site security
                                              Throttlebox - The next generation in bandwidth control
                                              Clonebox - Backup and disaster recovery on steroids

                                              Comment

                                              • JFK
                                                FUBAR the ORIGINATOR
                                                • Jan 2002
                                                • 67373

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by WebCashMaker
                                                Setting the ISO high will cause the pictures to come more grainy than using a lower ISO setting.
                                                yup, that could be a cause

                                                FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX
                                                For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com

                                                Comment

                                                • DamianJ
                                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                  • Jul 2006
                                                  • 15808

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by Paul Markham
                                                  It cold be the ISO setting, light or just out of focus.
                                                  Could you explain to how lighting or focus affect graininess?

                                                  Thanks.

                                                  Comment

                                                  • Grapesoda
                                                    So Fucking Banned
                                                    • Jul 2003
                                                    • 46238

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by DamianJ
                                                    Could you explain to how lighting or focus affect graininess?

                                                    Thanks.
                                                    lack of light will cause the sensor NOT to gather information, the sensor will then try to 'create information' which is usually perceived as grain.

                                                    now about megapixel... is some ways megapixel is important to image quality... if not why would mags use MF at 45-60MP for shots? it all about the information gathered. the more information, the better decisions the processor in camera can make... and the the more choices the editor and printer have.

                                                    I started shooting digital in June 2001 with a 3mp camera and I don't mean pics of the dog at the park, I'm referring to creating content on a daily basis. I've been using bodies that have progressed up the MP ladder and seen the difference in MP vrs quality.

                                                    the biggest differences I experience is clarity, color and latitude, i.e. the smoothness of the gradient between black and whites... the more MP the more information available to carry the contrast between black and white, the more information available to render the shades of color in the images as well.

                                                    I have a professinal 12mp body and a professional 24mp body, while the 12mp body is a low light monster the 24mp body is the body of choice... best color I've ever expereince since using a digital camera.

                                                    as for focus making an image grainy..... standing by for wall of text

                                                    Comment

                                                    • ArsewithClass
                                                      So Fucking Banned
                                                      • Mar 2007
                                                      • 7957

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by DamianJ
                                                      Could you explain to how lighting or focus affect graininess?

                                                      Thanks.
                                                      The higher the ISO setting the grainier the photo quality

                                                      Comment

                                                      • DBS.US
                                                        Geo Cities
                                                        • Aug 2003
                                                        • 11843

                                                        #28

                                                        http://camerasim.com/camera-simulator.html
                                                        Have an unused domain? Make a Free Chaturbate White Label site and be making money tonight

                                                        Comment

                                                        • JP-pornshooter
                                                          Confirmed User
                                                          • Sep 2006
                                                          • 4007

                                                          #29
                                                          good replies here..

                                                          if i was looking for a non slr and perhaps even if i was looking for a budget slr, i would take a serious look at the sony interchangeable alpha lens "nex 5".
                                                          "Obscenity is whatever gives the Judge an erection." -- Author Unknown

                                                          Comment

                                                          Working...