|
I am happy enough to listen to the arguments and reasoning. what i fucking hate is when people say things that they have no evidence for or any sort of link or proof.
oh this was found at crash site a, this was found at crash site b. !!! must be an inside job. or they point to some video on youtube made by nobody pointing to grainy items on a video.
and these turn into bushfire rumours that are simply going to spread across the web when probably it did not happen.
why do people ignore osama bin laden? he did attacks before and attacks after (or were they staged too, just to give 9/11 more credibility??? LOL. were the attacks in africa done by al queda or by the US governemnt?). he admitted the attacks, there was reason for the attacks. I mean if you were religious, you might too be a bit pissed off that a foreign army was on your sacred land no??
get some fresh air, take a look around and you will see plenty of people pissed off with the USA who would love to attack the country. But no that doens't make sense that an a pissed off terrorist group would attack buildings, far more sense that a government would do it. the same government who made a major fuck up by not finding WMD when attacking Iraq but who can pull off an immaculate plan of killing thousands of it's own citizens.
9/11 or not. usa would have gone to war with iraq.
heck i dont even know what I am saying, now i sound crazy for arguing with the crazies. i need some fresh air.
|