Quote:
Originally Posted by epitome
But wait, you shot her shortly after she turned 18 and in the photos she says she did not consent to, she has less tats than when you shot her? Please correct me if I miss understood.
Maybe she used the money you paid her to get tattoos removed!  |
If anything, she used the money she made from me (and we shot multiple times), to get more tattoos (the very big, noticeable, and practically impossible to cover or remove, type of tats - which I encouraged her not to get).
Another ADG Amanda Set
Chronig, come out, come out, wherever you are...
For a guy that usually has a lot to say, you suddenly don't seem to have much to say.
A redacted 2257 photo can easily put this all to rest, if you and your "Member" that supposedly uploaded the photo session in question (which your site is hiding behind), are legit that is.
I will be quick to absolve you of any wrongdoing here, if you can post any proof whatsoever that you have 2257 documentation for the model involved.
ADG