Quote:
Originally Posted by DateDoc
They "CLAIM" to be user submitted sites which is a loophole in 2257 requirements. You would have to prove they uploaded the content to go after them on 2257 as it stands right now I believe. Also, they would have to be in the US.
|
LOL, thats funny. How many amateur people make professional looking, 60 minute long videos where the guy fucks for hours at a time and the girl looks like a porn star. Also pay no mind to the url on the video that goes to a porn site.
I think it is very easy to see what is real user submitted content and what is professional content. The 2257 exception (loop hole) should be for real amateur people who upload content they made. If it can't be proven they made the content, or easily proven that they didn't, then 2257 should be required for that content as well. No matter if it was uploaded by the company who owns the content or some idiot who stole it.