Quote:
Originally Posted by will76
then you tie it back into the site owner and they have no protection from DMCA if they put it there. they are nailed. there is clear case of copyright violation by the "user". you can easily force the site that is acting like a "hosting company" to turn over the information for that user. If they dont have the info or if it ties back to them they are fucked.
|
sounds a little too complicated, could be easier than that.. if you C&D the site owner, you also C&D the host... then the host is notified the site owner...
The host has certain Terms & Conditions to abide by in regards to their network contract and passes these terms down to their end users...
you know the old "no spamming" no illegal content stuff.
If you are hitting them with 3-4 C&D's and they are not doing nothing
now the HOST is just as reliable as the copyright infringing site owner is
Now you have direct heat scenario on the host to force the client to shape up.... The host risks getting sued based on clients illegal or care free site operating... The host risks losing its entire plug, thus is the ultiamte pressure...
Now there is more than just a host.. you can also C&D the hosts uplink backbone provider(s) and let them know as well.. now you have a backbone provider putting heat on the host, the host is putting heat on the client or pulling the plug as they don't want to be involved...
All this thought over a salad, yet according to barefootsie, im a ignorant idiot
BITCH eh? You're a fucking troll, and btw I sold content in the past, and if i ever caught another mother fucking selling or giving my content away, his ass would be on a silver fucking platter and be quartered.. thats the difference between PLAYERS AND GIMPS. Players move and react, gimps call others names on boards and suffer in their "small enviroment"