read this part in particular...
http://www.cjclassaction.com/Carrier...aint_Final.pdf
skip down to the part " B. Adware and Affiliate Commission theft".
It explains the process very well. However in this case it looks like a bunch of CJ affiliates are sueing CJ for allowing some of their affiliates to use "adware" and to not protect their other affiliates from being stolen from.
Sounds familar ? AFF affiliates would have an even better case. It was AFF and not their affiliates who ADMITED to using zango, which took sales away from their own affiliates.
Interesting stuff. I would definetly have your attornies read over it, and if you still looking for one Trey you might want to contact them.