![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: underground dwelling
Posts: 755
|
I had an error after I posted it. This is good for me...
![]() SPRINGFIELD, Ill. — The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday upheld a lower court’s ruling that Illinois’ Sexually Explicit Video Game Law (SEVGL) was unconstitutional and too broad. The Entertainment Software Association, among others, filed suit against the state of Illinois the day after the SEVGL was enacted July 25, 2005, claiming that the law violated the First Amendment. A district court permanently enjoined enforcement of the law, and the state of Illinois sought review. On appeal, the 7th Circuit affirmed the lower court’s ruling that the statue was not narrowly tailored. The Illinois state Legislature enacted the SEVGL, which criminalized the sale of sexually explicit video games to minors, and required vendors of such games to label any sexually explicit game with a four-square-inch label reading “18,” and provide relevant signage within the stores where games are sold. Critics of the bill felt the definition of content that is deemed “too violent or sexually explicit” for minors is not clearly defined and will be left to the discretion of possibly discriminatory store owners. The court exposed flaws in the law using the game God of War as an example of the type of content that could have been unfairly categorized as sexually explicit. “Because the SEVGL potentially criminalizes the sale of any game that features exposed breasts, without concern for the game considered in its entirety or for the game’s social value for minors, distribution of 'God of War' is potentially illegal, in spite of the fact that the game tracks the Homeric epics in content and theme,” the 7th Circuit said. “As we have suggested in the past, there is serious reason to believe that a statute sweeps too broadly when it prohibits a game that is essentially an interactive, digital version of the Odyssey.” States and communities that have so far considered and then rejected similar legislation include Washington state, Indianapolis, Ind., and St. Louis County, Mo. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
HOMICIDAL TROLL KILLER
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sunnybrook Institution for the Criminally Insane
Posts: 20,419
|
its 3d characters
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: TO
Posts: 8,619
|
What would be a brave move (but will never happen) by game designers or console companies would be to just stop making games with sex and graphic violence in them. They know damn well that kids get their hands on them one way or another.
Why not just do the right thing and regulate themselves? Oh, that's right ... violent and games with sexual content make too much money. Me bad. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |