![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,270
|
AMD OPTERON 64BIT VS Xeon 3.6 64bit
Okay so here it is, 3 to 2 AMD Opteron 250 duel processor system beats the new xeon 3.6 64 bit systems.
There were five tests: SQL Stress Tool Benchmark (Reads) Xeon 3.6GHz - 105295* Opteron 250 - 103198 SQL Stress Tool Benchmark (Writes) Xeon 3.6GHz - 42102* Opteron 250 - 41266 Vendor Heavy Workload Test (Reads) Opteron 250 - 252942* Xeon 3.6GHz - 242817 Vendor Heavy Workload Test (Writes) Opteron 250 - 252836* Xeon 3.6GHz - 242810 Vendor Heavy Workload Stored Procedures Opteron 250 - 3161* Xeon 3.6GHz - 3035 Intel is getting close but has yet to overcome the fact that AMD is ahead of the game. So all you host out there, I suggest you stop using those Intel Xeon processors and go for the opterons, cheaper, faster, and much more stable. I used to be an intel lover but now I must say my new duel opteron system smokes. So you test and make the choice, Im telling you, Opterons are the future.
__________________
E-mail marketing - Automation Scripting - IP Space AIM: splitjoelp ICQ: 254759453 skype - splitjoelp 702-941-6465 |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 35,218
|
I love AMD they are always staying that one step ahead
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,047
|
Hmmm and how about Linux/FreeBSD compatibility?
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,270
|
Linux and bsd have both releashed x64_86 addition OS they run very well with the opeteorn 64 bit systems
__________________
E-mail marketing - Automation Scripting - IP Space AIM: splitjoelp ICQ: 254759453 skype - splitjoelp 702-941-6465 |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,270
|
Welcome to the Source
This site is dedicated to porting open source software to the AMD64 architecture, including: GNU/Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD and OpenBSD. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3.0 ES Now Supports AMD64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3.0 includes three versions: WS for workstations AS for mission critical Enterprise servers ES for small to mid-range servers Initial releases of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3.0 ES only offered x86 (32-bit support). However, responding to customer requests, Red Hat has now expanded ES to include 64-bit support for AMD64 processors.
__________________
E-mail marketing - Automation Scripting - IP Space AIM: splitjoelp ICQ: 254759453 skype - splitjoelp 702-941-6465 |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 18,638
|
in support
![]()
__________________
I like turtles. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |